Re: [kbuild-devel] linux kernel conf 0.3

2002-09-06 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Greg Banks wrote: I dislike the requirement to convert all existing config.in files to support the new syntax. You already have the machinery to do the conversion online as needed, so why not detect if config.in is newer than config.lkc and if thats the case

Re: [kbuild-devel] linux kernel conf 0.3

2002-09-06 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 03:45:45PM +1000, Greg Banks wrote: It seemed easy to add a check to gcml2 for if statements beginning and ending in the same file, so last night I did it. The result is... zero such cases in 2.5.33. The idea popped up when I noticed the missing endmenu in the

Re: [kbuild-devel] linux kernel conf 0.3

2002-09-05 Thread Greg Banks
Sam Ravnborg wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:40AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: Hi Roman, I really haven't had time to look at your release properly yet, sorry. I did notice though that the converter issues warnings for dead code and comparisons of boolean variables to m, which I thought

Re: [kbuild-devel] linux kernel conf 0.3

2002-09-04 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:40AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: To install simply run 'make install KERNELSRC=..' and to uninstall 'make uninstall KERNELSRC=..', only 'make [oldconfig|config|menuconfig| xconfig]' is implemented right now, but the rest is easy to do. I tested it only against

[kbuild-devel] linux kernel conf 0.3

2002-08-26 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, At http://www.xs4all.nl/~zippel/lc/lkc-0.3.tar.gz you can find the latest version of my config system. Over the weekend I was busy tuning/fixing the converter to keep the new rulebase as close as possible to the old one. Unless I made an error somewhere, the rulebase should be the same now.