https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
soredake changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ndrzj1...@relay.firefox.com
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
Adam Fontenot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adam.m.fontenot+kde@gmail.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
--- Comment #42 from Mircea Kitsune ---
(In reply to tagwerk19 from comment #41)
Yeah 100MB sounds like a good default limit for all files. I'd make it an
option in the search settings of course, users should be able to customize this
based on the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
--- Comment #41 from tagwer...@innerjoin.org ---
(In reply to Martin Steigerwald from comment #40)
> ... go for the
> first 100 KiB and ignore the rest, instead of just indexing the file name in
> such cases...
At the moment there's a 10MByte limit for
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
--- Comment #40 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Wow, kudos for the new website design for Bugzilla.
It could also be a limit up to which files would be indexed. I.e. go for the
first 100 KiB and ignore the rest, instead of just indexing the file name in
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
soredake changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|ndrzj1...@relay.firefox.com |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
--- Comment #39 from Mircea Kitsune ---
(In reply to tagwerk19 from comment #38)
+1 on that idea. Dolphin actually has a file size limit for generating
thumbnails, in Manjaro you need to manually remove it or most images won't
generate thumbnails at
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
sourcemaker changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||446071
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
--- Comment #38 from tagwer...@innerjoin.org ---
Another reference "for completeness":
8...
baloo_file_extractor can get caught on files that require hours to index,
the example case
being a PDF containing a scientific plot. The plot itself is
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
--- Comment #37 from pie...@e-delman.com ---
(In reply to tagwerk19 from comment #35)
> $ baloosearch -i filename:"one of your files"
> and you get multiple results with different ID's. Check the file itself
> $ stat "one of your files"
Hi,
Just
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
--- Comment #36 from tagwer...@innerjoin.org ---
One more observation for the collection.
It may be that "spike loads" in memory usage trigger OOM protection and
baloo_file_extractor and baloo_file are killed.
Tangentially observed in Fedora 35:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
--- Comment #35 from tagwer...@innerjoin.org ---
(In reply to pierre from comment #34)
> The slow down appears as I had just upgraded to 20.04 LTS ans I remember
> that I had the same problem 3 years ago after upgrading to 18.04.
You would get a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
pie...@e-delman.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pie...@e-delman.com
--- Comment #34 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
--- Comment #33 from tagwer...@innerjoin.org ---
(In reply to tagwerk19 from comment #31)
> Consider this as a "Where are we?" summary; an attempt to collect together
> different threads and weave in new evidence.
Weaving in a couple of extra references
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
--- Comment #32 from Mircea Kitsune ---
The issue seems to have gotten somewhat better at this day, especially with the
latest Plasma version 5.22. Though I've since moved to using an SSD / NVME
drive, might be why disk sleep isn't as bad as it used to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
--- Comment #31 from tagwer...@innerjoin.org ---
It could be that there are several different issues being "bundled together".
1...
There are, for example, problems with openSUSE that runs BTRFS
with multiple subvols, check with finding one of
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
Mircea Kitsune changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sonichedgehog_hyperblast00@
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
tagwer...@innerjoin.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tagwer...@innerjoin.org
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
soredake changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ndrzj1...@relay.firefox.com
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
Oded Arbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||o...@geek.co.il
--- Comment #29 from Oded Arbel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
--- Comment #28 from Øystein Steffensen-Alværvik ---
This happens both if Baloo is index file *contents*, and when it's just
indexing info on files. I have to turn indexing completely off, if not my
computer becomes practically unusable upon every
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
Øystein Steffensen-Alværvik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.45.0 |5.64.0
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
Øystein Steffensen-Alværvik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yst...@posteo.net
--- Comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
Kai Krakow changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.kde.org/show_b
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
Karl Ove Hufthammer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@huftis.org
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|NOR |VHI
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
--- Comment #26 from rich...@meinsen.net ---
Hi
the comming change from actual to file size is good, also the change from
expected to used.
the link concerning 120% is not really clear to me. some sum was changed. but
the ouput still remains
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
--- Comment #25 from Stefan Brüns ---
==
Dear Users,
the issue described in this bug report is well understood. Solving the problem
requires significant changes to the database scheme. Before doing this changes
we have to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
--- Comment #24 from Stefan Brüns ---
(In reply to richard from comment #23)
>
> Why is the expected size only 2/3 of actual?
> And why don't the DB sizes sum up to the actual size?
> And what does 120% really mean?
Re actual size:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
rich...@meinsen.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rich...@meinsen.net
--- Comment #23 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
Jacques changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jacq...@stry.co.za
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
Patrick Silva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugsefor...@gmx.com
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
soredake changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fds...@krutt.org
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
Yuri Chornoivan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yurc...@ukr.net
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
--- Comment #22 from Kevin Colyer ---
(In reply to Stefan Brüns from comment #21)
> It would save a lot of developer time if not everyone would add their "me
> too" comments.
>
> Changes to the database are planned, but this is not trivial. One
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
--- Comment #21 from Stefan Brüns ---
It would save a lot of developer time if not everyone would add their "me too"
comments.
Changes to the database are planned, but this is not trivial. One structure may
work well for a number of cases and cause
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
--- Comment #20 from Kevin Colyer ---
(In reply to Stefan Brüns from comment #19)
> An exponential backoff would only help if baloo would index the same files
> recurrently.
>
> If you add new documents to your indexed folders, baloo will process
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
--- Comment #19 from Stefan Brüns ---
An exponential backoff would only help if baloo would index the same files
recurrently.
If you add new documents to your indexed folders, baloo will process these. It
will not get better when you commit changesets
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
Kevin Colyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@thecolyers.net
--- Comment #18 from Kevin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
--- Comment #17 from Alberto Salvia Novella ---
Since I'm not using Plasma right now I'm unsubscribing from this bug, but feel
free to re-subscribe me if you needed any help from me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
Alberto Salvia Novella changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|es204904...@gmail.com |
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martin.tlus...@gmail.com
--- Comment #16 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexan...@zhigalin.tk
--- Comment #15 from Nate
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.kde.org/show_b
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thomas.mesch...@ilr.tu-berl
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t.ki...@gmail.com
--- Comment #12 from Nate
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||es204904...@gmail.com
--- Comment #11 from Nate
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||edoantoni...@hotmail.com
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yanp.b...@gmail.com
--- Comment #9 from Nate
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
--- Comment #8 from Jack ---
After several reboots, I finally had systemsettings5 show me file search, and
turning that off, and another reboot, seems to have stopped the indexer from
running.
The odd thing was that despite earlier doing balooctl
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
--- Comment #6 from Mayeul Cantan ---
(In reply to Axel Braun from comment #5)
> (In reply to Stefan Brüns from comment #4)
>
> > Even with low priority, the kernel eventually has to flush the write
> > buffers, causing the high I/O latency for other
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
--- Comment #5 from Axel Braun ---
(In reply to Stefan Brüns from comment #4)
> Even with low priority, the kernel eventually has to flush the write
> buffers, causing the high I/O latency for other tasks.
Should the I/O traffic from higher
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
--- Comment #4 from Stefan Brüns ---
(In reply to Mayeul Cantan from comment #3)
> Could baloorunner be ran with the equivalent of ionice -c 3 by default? (and
> maybe nice as well). My CPU is quite beefy, but I suffer of I/O contention:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
Mayeul Cantan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mayeul.can...@live.fr
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
--- Comment #2 from Axel Braun ---
Thanks for your explanation, Stefan. Although I dont know how I can influence
the behaviour. If I start the computer the next day I would not expect heavy
re-indexing.
Are - by default - the database stores for
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
--- Comment #1 from Stefan Brüns ---
Unfortunately even the two most fundamental databases in baloo, the Terms and
the FileNameTerms DBs, show O(M^2) behaviour on updates. Everytime e.g. a "pdf"
is changed, the associated value (i.e. the IDs of all
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@kde.org,
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704
Zane Tu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zan...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
61 matches
Mail list logo
