On Saturday, May 4, 2013 22:21:07 you wrote:
approach would have had no technical advantage other than working around
the pointless freeze.
i understand the freeze is pointless to you. it is not pointless to others.
(Quite the opposite, the plugin approach that was
suggested would have
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110277/
---
Review request for KDE Runtime.
Description
---
I have gone through
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108845/#review32127
---
Ship it!
My knowledge of the changes in the MMX/SSE landscape
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109538/
---
(Updated May 6, 2013, 11:57 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109551/#review32130
---
Martin, any news about that patch? Or we still have no clue
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110328/
---
Review request for KDE Runtime and Harald Sitter.
Description
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110328/
---
(Updated May 6, 2013, 4:01 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Runtime and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110330/
---
Review request for KDE Runtime and Harald Sitter.
Description
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110331/
---
Review request for KDE Runtime and Harald Sitter.
Description
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110330/
---
(Updated May 6, 2013, 4:17 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Runtime and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110328/#review32142
---
kwalletd/kwalletd.h
On May 6, 2013, 4:40 p.m., Lamarque Souza wrote:
kwalletd/kwalletd.h, line 226
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110328/diff/1/?file=142372#file142372line226
Why split this feature into three different review requests? One of
your requests [2] is just one line change and the other
On segunda-feira, 6 de maio de 2013 16.01.27, Eike Hein wrote:
It's a change desired by downstream consumers Kubuntu and Netrunner, and
perhaps others, and recreates a modification they used to carry for KDE 3.
Their goal is to make KWallet mostly invisible to the user during routine
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110328/
---
(Updated May 6, 2013, 4:48 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Runtime and
Alle lunedì 6 maggio 2013, Lamarque Souza ha scritto:
password is a QString, right? Then you should use
password.clear() here instead of assigning an empty QString. That
avoids creating a temporary QString.
$ grep -A1 QString::clear /usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qstring.h
inline void
Well, as I said last week, I started working on it.
First few commits are in branch mbriza/kdisplaymanager-split.
Currently, PLEASE, don't judge me for the KDMBackendPrivate class stuff.
:) I have just cut that out of KDisplayManager, not really knowing what to
do with it further. I'll try to
$ grep -A1 QString::clear /usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qstring.h
inline void QString::clear()
{ if (!isNull()) *this = QString(); }
Fun - the and makes it empty part in the QString docs sure makes it sound
like it's going to make it non-null, I guess that's what Lamarque thought.
OK, so back to
He probably only thought about the extra QString() which Pino just
prove it's useless, I was with lamarque because of the Krazy
check but this one is indeed crazy :P
Maybe QLatin1String() can be better than just in this case
2013/5/6 Eike Hein eikeh...@gmail.com:
$ grep -A1 QString::clear
On May 6, 2013, 4:40 p.m., Lamarque Souza wrote:
kwalletd/kwalletd.h, line 226
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110328/diff/1/?file=142372#file142372line226
Why split this feature into three different review requests? One of
your requests [2] is just one line change and the other
On May 6, 2013, 4:40 p.m., Lamarque Souza wrote:
kwalletd/kwalletd.h, line 226
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110328/diff/1/?file=142372#file142372line226
Why split this feature into three different review requests? One of
your requests [2] is just one line change and the other
How does KWallet encrypt if no password has been set?
About as badly as one would expect. It does still generate a hash which
it uses for encryption. What kwalletd does is try whether it can open a
wallet with an empty password first (thus generating the same hash) and
ask for one to be
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110328/
---
(Updated May 6, 2013, 5:25 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Runtime and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110330/
---
(Updated May 6, 2013, 5:28 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Runtime and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110327/#review32146
---
I think your patch will fix the bug 304775. ;)
Bug 304775 -
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110327/#review32149
---
Looks very reasonable from my point of view, thanks! And yes,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110327/#review32154
---
Semi-OT (sorry) - what makes this thing appear on top of
On May 6, 2013, 9:32 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
Semi-OT (sorry) - what makes this thing appear on top of things (below
the toolbar) - and why?
In a NW gravity world, this means the UI is shifted downwards under the
users fingers (no matter where you are, the poaint where your mouse
On May 6, 2013, 8:45 p.m., Frank Reininghaus wrote:
kdeui/widgets/kmessagewidget.cpp, line 253
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110327/diff/1/?file=142371#file142371line253
I guess you can remove the variable 'icon' from this function now,
right?
Indeed. Removing it.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110339/
---
Review request for kde-workspace and Fredrik Höglund.
Description
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110327/
---
(Updated May 6, 2013, 10:59 p.m.)
Review request for Dolphin, Kate and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110339/#review32170
---
kcontrol/input/xcursor/xcursortheme.cpp
On Monday, May 06, 2013 19:11:19 Eike Hein wrote:
How does KWallet encrypt if no password has been set?
About as badly as one would expect. It does still generate a hash which
it uses for encryption. What kwalletd does is try whether it can open a
wallet with an empty password first (thus
El Dissabte, 4 de maig de 2013, a les 14:01:45, Vishesh Handa va escriure:
Hey everyone
As you might have heard there was a fiasco in the nepomuk-core repository
where the 'master' branch was accidentally merged into KDE/4.10. Since then
the system admins had to do a hard reset to v4.10.2
El Dilluns, 6 de maig de 2013, a les 19:37:15, Nicolás Alvarez va escriure:
2013/5/6 Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org
El Dissabte, 4 de maig de 2013, a les 14:01:45, Vishesh Handa va escriure:
Hey everyone
As you might have heard there was a fiasco in the nepomuk-core
repository
El Diumenge, 28 d'abril de 2013, a les 14:05:45, Lydia Pintscher va escriure:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:51 AM, Pau Garcia i Quiles
pgqui...@elpauer.org wrote:
Hi,
Last weekend we had the KDE eV Sprint at Berlin.
For various reasons, financial mainly, it was clear we need to raise
2013/5/6 Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org
El Dilluns, 6 de maig de 2013, a les 19:37:15, Nicolás Alvarez va escriure:
2013/5/6 Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org
El Dissabte, 4 de maig de 2013, a les 14:01:45, Vishesh Handa va
escriure:
Hey everyone
As you might have heard there
El Dilluns, 6 de maig de 2013, a les 19:49:13, Nicolás Alvarez va escriure:
2013/5/6 Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org
El Dilluns, 6 de maig de 2013, a les 19:37:15, Nicolás Alvarez va
escriure:
2013/5/6 Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org
El Dissabte, 4 de maig de 2013, a les 14:01:45,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110339/
---
(Updated May 6, 2013, 11:04 p.m.)
Review request for kde-workspace and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110339/#review32174
---
Ship it!
I haven't reviewed the binary files, but the rest
El Dimarts, 7 de maig de 2013, a les 00:54:20, Albert Astals Cid va escriure:
El Dilluns, 6 de maig de 2013, a les 19:49:13, Nicolás Alvarez va escriure:
2013/5/6 Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org
El Dilluns, 6 de maig de 2013, a les 19:37:15, Nicolás Alvarez va
escriure:
2013/5/6
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110339/#review32175
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110339/
---
(Updated May 6, 2013, 11:14 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
42 matches
Mail list logo
