Re: Review Request: Fix Object::connect: No such slot AbstractItemView::iconSettingsChanged(int)

2011-09-30 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102719/#review6941 --- Ship it! yes, the slot moved to the FolderView class itself,

Re: The case for a kdelibs 4.8

2011-09-30 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 18:11:12 Kevin Kofler wrote: Wait and see the chaos that will come up when users open their Help/About in Konqueror and it tells them that they're using Konqueror 4.8.0 under KDE 4.7.6. (And yes, it still says only KDE in 4.6.5, I haven't checked 4.7 or 4.8 for

Re: The case for a kdelibs 4.8

2011-09-30 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 23:57:53 Scott Kitterman wrote: I don't like the fact that KDE developers decided to ignore their own policy on maintenance updates. I think it breaks your contract with your downstreams. In the case of what's been done so far, it doesn't have an impact on us.

Re: The case for a kdelibs 4.8

2011-09-30 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 23:57:56 Kevin Kofler wrote: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102175/ https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102291/ https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102350/ none of these are critical feature additions. they elevate the usability of libplasma and are valuable,

Re: The case for a kdelibs 4.8

2011-09-30 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 14:01:50 Kevin Kofler wrote: 1. This puts kdelibs 4 into maintenance mode even before KDE Frameworks 5 is anywhere near a release, let alone versions of the workspace and applications actually using it. As a result, we will fail to deliver new features to our

Who relies on Soprano::Model::statement[s]Added|Removed signals?

2011-09-30 Thread Sebastian Trüg
Hi lists, with frameworks in the building and Nepomuk probably going that direction already for 4.8 I would like to clean up a bit. One of these cleanup tasks targets the Soprano::Model statement signals. So far these were the only way to get informed about changes in Nepomuk - with a very bad

Re: Who relies on Soprano::Model::statement[s]Added|Removed signals?

2011-09-30 Thread Alex Merry
On 30/09/11 12:36, Sebastian Trüg wrote: I would like to anyone using the old API to change to the new ResourceWatcher as soon as possible because I would like to disable the old signals soon. They simply entail to many problems and clutter the API. You might want to contact developers using

Re: The case for a kdelibs 4.8

2011-09-30 Thread Heinz Wiesinger
On Thursday 29 September 2011 14:01:50 Kevin Kofler wrote: Hi, as you probably already know, a decision was recently made that kdelibs 4.7 would be the last 4.x release series of kdelibs, and work would be ongoing in the 5.0 (frameworks) and 4.7 (KDE/4.7) branches only. I think this is a

Re: The case for a kdelibs 4.8 (fwd)

2011-09-30 Thread Eric Hameleers
Forwarding my answer to kde-core-devel in order to give us packagers a voice outside our own closed mailing list. Cheers, Eric -- Eric Hameleers al...@slackware.com Jabber: al...@jabber.xs4all.nl -- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:37:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Eric

Review Request: Fix HTTPProtocol::put

2011-09-30 Thread Dawit Alemayehu
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102743/ --- Review request for kdelibs and Andreas Hartmetz. Description --- Fix

Re: Review Request: Fix KPasswdServer usage of KWallet

2011-09-30 Thread Dawit Alemayehu
On Sept. 29, 2011, 8:14 p.m., Dawit Alemayehu wrote: Sorry, but this is simply wrong. There is a specific reason why passwords are not blindly saved into the wallet before they are validated. The idea of prompting the user for password and actually storing that password need to be

Re: The case for a kdelibs 4.8

2011-09-30 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Thursday, 2011-09-29, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: The reason to stop master was (as far as I understand) to make the frameworks branch easily to maintain. If someone is working on 4.8 (bugfixing, features) all this has to be ported to frameworks, too. So you develop a moving target on a moving

Re: The case for a kdelibs 4.8

2011-09-30 Thread todd rme
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote: On Thursday, September 29, 2011 14:01:50 Kevin Kofler wrote: 2. It will be confusing to our users, and even to some packagers, to have a KDE SC 4.8 on kdelibs 4.7. The rule so far has always been that the kdelibs version

Re: The case for a kdelibs 4.8

2011-09-30 Thread David Faure
On Thursday 29 September 2011 20:01:00 Kevin Kofler wrote: But one of my points is that we need features too, not just bugfixes. Continuing 4.7.x releases solves the problem of bugfixes just fine, but entirely fails to address the issue of features. But who is (or would be) working on features

Re: The case for a kdelibs 4.8

2011-09-30 Thread Markus Slopianka
On Donnerstag 29 September 2011 18:11:12 Kevin Kofler wrote: Wait and see the chaos that will come up when users open their Help/About in Konqueror and it tells them that they're using Konqueror 4.8.0 under KDE 4.7.6. (And yes, it still says only KDE in 4.6.5, I haven't checked 4.7 or 4.8 for

Re: The case for a kdelibs 4.8

2011-09-30 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, September 30, 2011 04:15:51 PM Markus Slopianka wrote: (As a side note I also think that KDE Applications should completely lose their version number and get date-based versioning because any application can get major new features at any time – see Dolphin 2.0 in SC 4.8.) Today,

Review Request: fix sycoca off by one

2011-09-30 Thread Jaime Torres Amate
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102748/ --- Review request for kdelibs and David Faure. Description --- fixing

Re: The case for a kdelibs 4.8

2011-09-30 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Thursday 29 September 2011, Andras Mantia wrote: On Thursday, September 29, 2011 21:43:34 Stefan Majewsky wrote: Without judging on the other arguments which look very reasonable to me... On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: 2. It will be

Re: Re: The case for a kdelibs 4.8

2011-09-30 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Dijous, 29 de setembre de 2011, Scott Kitterman vàreu escriure: On Thursday, September 29, 2011 11:47:22 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote: A Dijous, 29 de setembre de 2011, Scott Kitterman vàreu escriure: On Thursday, September 29, 2011 08:01:00 PM Kevin Kofler wrote: On Thursday 29

Re: Re: The case for a kdelibs 4.8

2011-09-30 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Divendres, 30 de setembre de 2011, Aaron J. Seigo vàreu escriure: On Thursday, September 29, 2011 23:57:56 Kevin Kofler wrote: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102175/ https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102291/ https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102350/ none of these are critical

Re: Re: The case for a kdelibs 4.8

2011-09-30 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Divendres, 30 de setembre de 2011, Alexander Neundorf vàreu escriure: On Thursday 29 September 2011, Andras Mantia wrote: On Thursday, September 29, 2011 21:43:34 Stefan Majewsky wrote: Without judging on the other arguments which look very reasonable to me... On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at

Re: Who relies on Soprano::Model::statement[s]Added|Removed signals?

2011-09-30 Thread Sebastian Trüg
of course this is for the frameworks thingi. On 09/30/2011 07:09 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote: On 2011-09-30, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: A Divendres, 30 de setembre de 2011, Sebastian Trüg vàreu escriure: Hi lists, with frameworks in the building and Nepomuk probably going that

Re: Re: Who relies on Soprano::Model::statement[s]Added|Removed signals?

2011-09-30 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Divendres, 30 de setembre de 2011, Sebastian Trüg vàreu escriure: of course this is for the frameworks thingi. Oh, sorry for the misinterpretation. Albert On 09/30/2011 07:09 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote: On 2011-09-30, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: A Divendres, 30 de setembre de

Re: The case for a kdelibs 4.8

2011-09-30 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Am Freitag, 30. September 2011, 10:07:27 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo: will say Platform 4.7, Plasma Workspaces 4.8 and application updates (or something along those lines). that was not just a marketing ploy, but an attempt to align our public communication with the realities that already existed

gamer mouse button shortcuts (LONG)

2011-09-30 Thread Rick Stockton
I've been inspired by the 'shortcut doc' Thread on kwin ML. This concerns mouse devices with extra buttons driving our desktop, and creating mouse-based shortcuts. SAD STORY You may recall that, many months ago, I was encouraged to try a Qt enhancement for this. Qt consumes X11 ButtonPress