Re: Review Request 108504: [High-dpi issues] Fix KIconDialog

2013-01-22 Thread Kai Uwe Broulik

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/#review25914
---



kio/kfile/kicondialog.cpp
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/#comment19799

I should've googl'd a bit more thorougly.
Using q-setInitialSize works here :)


- Kai Uwe Broulik


On Jan. 20, 2013, 11:15 a.m., Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/
 ---
 
 (Updated Jan. 20, 2013, 11:15 a.m.)
 
 
 Review request for kdelibs and KDE Usability.
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 This makes the KIconDialog (the dialog where you can choose icons for eg. 
 folders) respect the global icon size. Almost all sizes were hardcoded but 
 the patch does away with all of this and works fine with all icon sizes and 
 big font sizes. Also made it aware of FontMetrics (atm with bigger fonts, 
 they also get clipped) and adjusts the grid height accordingly.
 
 Was fun diving into that ancient code :)
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   kio/kfile/kicondialog.cpp b7d646f 
 
 Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 Yup, see screenshot.
 
 The only issue that remains is the initial size of the dialog to make it show 
 4 rows of icons. In the current implementation it just adds another 100px to 
 the dialog height (cf. line 490), which is easy, if all the sizes are known 
 and fixed, but with variing sizes this becomes an issue and I could not think 
 of a proper solution. I probably need to add a sizeHint (tried in the private 
 class, didn't help there)? The easiest but not neccessarily best solution 
 would be to just set the minimumHeight to 4 rows and done.
 
 
 File Attachments
 
 
 Icon Dialog with 200dpi
   
 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2013/01/20/icondialog.png
 Icon Dialog with 200dpi (without patch)
   
 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2013/01/20/icondialog2.png
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Kai Uwe Broulik
 




Re: Review Request 108504: [High-dpi issues] Fix KIconDialog

2013-01-21 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer


 On Jan. 20, 2013, 11:53 a.m., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
  File Attachment: Icon Dialog with 200dpi
  http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/#fcomment5
 
  Why is that icon smaller than the others? Is it because the bigger 
  version of it does not exist?
 
 Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
 Also wondered but just checked, it is only available in max. 48x48

Ok. So from the usability POV, this is definitely an improvement. The code has 
to be checked by code people ;) (and IIRC, the usbaility team isn't supposed 
to click Ship It, to avoid confusion)


- Thomas


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/#review25835
---


On Jan. 20, 2013, 11:15 a.m., Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/
 ---
 
 (Updated Jan. 20, 2013, 11:15 a.m.)
 
 
 Review request for kdelibs and KDE Usability.
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 This makes the KIconDialog (the dialog where you can choose icons for eg. 
 folders) respect the global icon size. Almost all sizes were hardcoded but 
 the patch does away with all of this and works fine with all icon sizes and 
 big font sizes. Also made it aware of FontMetrics (atm with bigger fonts, 
 they also get clipped) and adjusts the grid height accordingly.
 
 Was fun diving into that ancient code :)
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   kio/kfile/kicondialog.cpp b7d646f 
 
 Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 Yup, see screenshot.
 
 The only issue that remains is the initial size of the dialog to make it show 
 4 rows of icons. In the current implementation it just adds another 100px to 
 the dialog height (cf. line 490), which is easy, if all the sizes are known 
 and fixed, but with variing sizes this becomes an issue and I could not think 
 of a proper solution. I probably need to add a sizeHint (tried in the private 
 class, didn't help there)? The easiest but not neccessarily best solution 
 would be to just set the minimumHeight to 4 rows and done.
 
 
 File Attachments
 
 
 Icon Dialog with 200dpi
   
 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2013/01/20/icondialog.png
 Icon Dialog with 200dpi (without patch)
   
 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2013/01/20/icondialog2.png
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Kai Uwe Broulik
 




Re: Review Request 108504: [High-dpi issues] Fix KIconDialog

2013-01-21 Thread Kai Uwe Broulik


 On Jan. 20, 2013, 2:40 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
  kio/kfile/kicondialog.cpp, line 141
  http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/diff/2/?file=108215#file108215line141
 
  Would it for such static sizes (why 60px in the first place?) not be 
  more correct to use sh. like 
  60*100*2/(widget-physicalDpiX()+widget-physicalDpiY()) where 100 wold 
  be the standard dpi? (could also be eg. 72 or 96)
  
  Right now (in latter RRs) you assign various configurable icon sizes to 
  remotely related views.
  That might be correct and intended, but it's also a behavioral change 
  and this time, desktop icons /can/ be assigned to 256px through the GUI - 
  even on a 72dpi screen - and that's unlikely the intended size here.

From what I can tell all the iconButtons are using Desktop icon sizes (either 
properly or some constant), so using it there which is triggered by the 
iconButton made sense to me.
And since KDE is nowhere near dpi independent, is the easiest and best way to 
do this imho. Otherwise we should just patch KIcon to return an icon size based 
on the screen dpi … but we don't use SVG icons and only have a limited amount 
of icon sizes (there is for example no 96x96 which is double 48x48 icon), so I 
see no other way.


- Kai Uwe


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/#review25844
---


On Jan. 20, 2013, 11:15 a.m., Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/
 ---
 
 (Updated Jan. 20, 2013, 11:15 a.m.)
 
 
 Review request for kdelibs and KDE Usability.
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 This makes the KIconDialog (the dialog where you can choose icons for eg. 
 folders) respect the global icon size. Almost all sizes were hardcoded but 
 the patch does away with all of this and works fine with all icon sizes and 
 big font sizes. Also made it aware of FontMetrics (atm with bigger fonts, 
 they also get clipped) and adjusts the grid height accordingly.
 
 Was fun diving into that ancient code :)
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   kio/kfile/kicondialog.cpp b7d646f 
 
 Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 Yup, see screenshot.
 
 The only issue that remains is the initial size of the dialog to make it show 
 4 rows of icons. In the current implementation it just adds another 100px to 
 the dialog height (cf. line 490), which is easy, if all the sizes are known 
 and fixed, but with variing sizes this becomes an issue and I could not think 
 of a proper solution. I probably need to add a sizeHint (tried in the private 
 class, didn't help there)? The easiest but not neccessarily best solution 
 would be to just set the minimumHeight to 4 rows and done.
 
 
 File Attachments
 
 
 Icon Dialog with 200dpi
   
 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2013/01/20/icondialog.png
 Icon Dialog with 200dpi (without patch)
   
 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2013/01/20/icondialog2.png
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Kai Uwe Broulik
 




Re: Review Request 108504: [High-dpi issues] Fix KIconDialog

2013-01-21 Thread Kai Uwe Broulik


 On Jan. 20, 2013, 2:40 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
  kio/kfile/kicondialog.cpp, line 141
  http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/diff/2/?file=108215#file108215line141
 
  Would it for such static sizes (why 60px in the first place?) not be 
  more correct to use sh. like 
  60*100*2/(widget-physicalDpiX()+widget-physicalDpiY()) where 100 wold 
  be the standard dpi? (could also be eg. 72 or 96)
  
  Right now (in latter RRs) you assign various configurable icon sizes to 
  remotely related views.
  That might be correct and intended, but it's also a behavioral change 
  and this time, desktop icons /can/ be assigned to 256px through the GUI - 
  even on a 72dpi screen - and that's unlikely the intended size here.
 
 Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
 From what I can tell all the iconButtons are using Desktop icon sizes 
 (either properly or some constant), so using it there which is triggered by 
 the iconButton made sense to me.
 And since KDE is nowhere near dpi independent, is the easiest and best 
 way to do this imho. Otherwise we should just patch KIcon to return an icon 
 size based on the screen dpi … but we don't use SVG icons and only have a 
 limited amount of icon sizes (there is for example no 96x96 which is double 
 48x48 icon), so I see no other way.
 
 Thomas Lübking wrote:
 Just checked, the view does indeed use the Desktop icons (not only group 
 but also size) and simply caps them when they're  60x60 - what is obviously 
 even wronger than wrong ;-)
 So fixed it must be, question is how - ie. is using the Desktop size 
 really intended here or just some hardcoded messup between 48 and Desktop?
 
 Mho is that this is not the desktop and the user cannot actually expect 
 the desktop size to be used here and while s/he might be happy with 
 apple-a-like 3 or 4 128px icons on the desktop, that size renders the dialog 
 unusable on even wuxga - not to mention all those 1366x768 notebooks.
 
  should just patch KIcon to return an icon size based on the screen dpi
 You mean when you ask for the Desktop icon size? Otherwise no option (you 
 cannot return a 128px icon when the user code explcitly asked for 64px since 
 you don't know what it's used for)
 
  there is for example no 96x96 which is double 48x48 icon
 - nearest integer, eg. coming from 72dpi, the correct size for 200dpi 
 would be 133.33px - 128px (but of course there's always a chance that you 
 run into a gap between the available sizes)
 
 If you seriously want to get KDE hires supportive, there must be fixes 
 reg. the usable icon sizes (in doubt via a dumb lanczos scale or some pixel 
 art algorithm) and global dpi awareness of the paintdevice.
 
 For the particular situation, relying on the desktop size is actually 
 reasonable due to the mentioned bug, but that cannot be a global strategy :-(

Well, Desktop defaults to 48x48 and if he increases it, he will probably have a 
reason for that. But yes, I also considered Dialog icons, or doubling dialog 
icons but this will give me for eaxmple 96x96 icons which get blurry. But that 
Desktop icon size has no real use case anyway since with Plasma Desktop there 
is no Desktop icon size. You either have an icon widget which can be scaled 
freely or the folderview which has its own slider for the icon size (and 
doesn't respect that setting anyway iirc)

 You mean when you ask for the Desktop icon size?
Nope, that whenever you do anything with pixels it is automatically matched to 
your dpi so KDE becomes completely resolution independent xD


- Kai Uwe


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/#review25844
---


On Jan. 20, 2013, 11:15 a.m., Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/
 ---
 
 (Updated Jan. 20, 2013, 11:15 a.m.)
 
 
 Review request for kdelibs and KDE Usability.
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 This makes the KIconDialog (the dialog where you can choose icons for eg. 
 folders) respect the global icon size. Almost all sizes were hardcoded but 
 the patch does away with all of this and works fine with all icon sizes and 
 big font sizes. Also made it aware of FontMetrics (atm with bigger fonts, 
 they also get clipped) and adjusts the grid height accordingly.
 
 Was fun diving into that ancient code :)
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   kio/kfile/kicondialog.cpp b7d646f 
 
 Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 Yup, see screenshot.
 
 The only issue that remains is the initial size of the dialog to make it show 
 4 rows of icons. In the current implementation it just adds another 100px to 
 the dialog 

Review Request 108504: [High-dpi issues] Fix KIconDialog

2013-01-20 Thread Kai Uwe Broulik

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/
---

Review request for kdelibs and KDE Usability.


Description
---

This makes the KIconDialog (the dialog where you can choose icons for eg. 
folders) respect the global icon size. Almost all sizes were hardcoded but the 
patch does away with all of this and works fine with all icon sizes and big 
font sizes. Also made it aware of FontMetrics (atm with bigger fonts, they also 
get clipped) and adjusts the grid height accordingly.

Was fun diving into that ancient code :)


Diffs
-

  kio/kfile/kicondialog.cpp b7d646f 

Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/diff/


Testing
---

Yup, see screenshot.

The only issue that remains is the initial size of the dialog. In the current 
implementation it just adds another 100px to the dialog height, which is easy, 
if all the sizes are known and fixed, but with variing sizes this becomes an 
issue and I could not think of a proper solution. See code comment below.


File Attachments


Icon Dialog with 200dpi
  http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2013/01/20/icondialog.png
Icon Dialog with 200dpi (without patch)
  http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2013/01/20/icondialog2.png


Thanks,

Kai Uwe Broulik



Re: Review Request 108504: [High-dpi issues] Fix KIconDialog

2013-01-20 Thread Kai Uwe Broulik

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/#review25834
---



kio/kfile/kicondialog.cpp
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/#comment19726

Didn't help here


- Kai Uwe Broulik


On Jan. 20, 2013, 11:13 a.m., Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/
 ---
 
 (Updated Jan. 20, 2013, 11:13 a.m.)
 
 
 Review request for kdelibs and KDE Usability.
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 This makes the KIconDialog (the dialog where you can choose icons for eg. 
 folders) respect the global icon size. Almost all sizes were hardcoded but 
 the patch does away with all of this and works fine with all icon sizes and 
 big font sizes. Also made it aware of FontMetrics (atm with bigger fonts, 
 they also get clipped) and adjusts the grid height accordingly.
 
 Was fun diving into that ancient code :)
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   kio/kfile/kicondialog.cpp b7d646f 
 
 Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 Yup, see screenshot.
 
 The only issue that remains is the initial size of the dialog. In the current 
 implementation it just adds another 100px to the dialog height, which is 
 easy, if all the sizes are known and fixed, but with variing sizes this 
 becomes an issue and I could not think of a proper solution. See code comment 
 below.
 
 
 File Attachments
 
 
 Icon Dialog with 200dpi
   
 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2013/01/20/icondialog.png
 Icon Dialog with 200dpi (without patch)
   
 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2013/01/20/icondialog2.png
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Kai Uwe Broulik
 




Re: Review Request 108504: [High-dpi issues] Fix KIconDialog

2013-01-20 Thread Kai Uwe Broulik

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/
---

(Updated Jan. 20, 2013, 11:15 a.m.)


Review request for kdelibs and KDE Usability.


Changes
---

Stupid Review Board discarded my code comments .. damnit, publish already!


Description
---

This makes the KIconDialog (the dialog where you can choose icons for eg. 
folders) respect the global icon size. Almost all sizes were hardcoded but the 
patch does away with all of this and works fine with all icon sizes and big 
font sizes. Also made it aware of FontMetrics (atm with bigger fonts, they also 
get clipped) and adjusts the grid height accordingly.

Was fun diving into that ancient code :)


Diffs
-

  kio/kfile/kicondialog.cpp b7d646f 

Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/diff/


Testing (updated)
---

Yup, see screenshot.

The only issue that remains is the initial size of the dialog to make it show 4 
rows of icons. In the current implementation it just adds another 100px to the 
dialog height (cf. line 490), which is easy, if all the sizes are known and 
fixed, but with variing sizes this becomes an issue and I could not think of a 
proper solution. I probably need to add a sizeHint (tried in the private class, 
didn't help there)? The easiest but not neccessarily best solution would be to 
just set the minimumHeight to 4 rows and done.


File Attachments


Icon Dialog with 200dpi
  http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2013/01/20/icondialog.png
Icon Dialog with 200dpi (without patch)
  http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2013/01/20/icondialog2.png


Thanks,

Kai Uwe Broulik



Re: Review Request 108504: [High-dpi issues] Fix KIconDialog

2013-01-20 Thread Thomas Lübking

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/#review25844
---



kio/kfile/kicondialog.cpp
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/#comment19729

Would it for such static sizes (why 60px in the first place?) not be more 
correct to use sh. like 
60*100*2/(widget-physicalDpiX()+widget-physicalDpiY()) where 100 wold be 
the standard dpi? (could also be eg. 72 or 96)

Right now (in latter RRs) you assign various configurable icon sizes to 
remotely related views.
That might be correct and intended, but it's also a behavioral change and 
this time, desktop icons /can/ be assigned to 256px through the GUI - even on a 
72dpi screen - and that's unlikely the intended size here.


- Thomas Lübking


On Jan. 20, 2013, 11:15 a.m., Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/
 ---
 
 (Updated Jan. 20, 2013, 11:15 a.m.)
 
 
 Review request for kdelibs and KDE Usability.
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 This makes the KIconDialog (the dialog where you can choose icons for eg. 
 folders) respect the global icon size. Almost all sizes were hardcoded but 
 the patch does away with all of this and works fine with all icon sizes and 
 big font sizes. Also made it aware of FontMetrics (atm with bigger fonts, 
 they also get clipped) and adjusts the grid height accordingly.
 
 Was fun diving into that ancient code :)
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   kio/kfile/kicondialog.cpp b7d646f 
 
 Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 Yup, see screenshot.
 
 The only issue that remains is the initial size of the dialog to make it show 
 4 rows of icons. In the current implementation it just adds another 100px to 
 the dialog height (cf. line 490), which is easy, if all the sizes are known 
 and fixed, but with variing sizes this becomes an issue and I could not think 
 of a proper solution. I probably need to add a sizeHint (tried in the private 
 class, didn't help there)? The easiest but not neccessarily best solution 
 would be to just set the minimumHeight to 4 rows and done.
 
 
 File Attachments
 
 
 Icon Dialog with 200dpi
   
 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2013/01/20/icondialog.png
 Icon Dialog with 200dpi (without patch)
   
 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2013/01/20/icondialog2.png
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Kai Uwe Broulik
 




Re: Review Request 108504: [High-dpi issues] Fix KIconDialog

2013-01-20 Thread Thomas Lübking


 On Jan. 20, 2013, 2:40 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
  kio/kfile/kicondialog.cpp, line 141
  http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/diff/2/?file=108215#file108215line141
 
  Would it for such static sizes (why 60px in the first place?) not be 
  more correct to use sh. like 
  60*100*2/(widget-physicalDpiX()+widget-physicalDpiY()) where 100 wold 
  be the standard dpi? (could also be eg. 72 or 96)
  
  Right now (in latter RRs) you assign various configurable icon sizes to 
  remotely related views.
  That might be correct and intended, but it's also a behavioral change 
  and this time, desktop icons /can/ be assigned to 256px through the GUI - 
  even on a 72dpi screen - and that's unlikely the intended size here.
 
 Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
 From what I can tell all the iconButtons are using Desktop icon sizes 
 (either properly or some constant), so using it there which is triggered by 
 the iconButton made sense to me.
 And since KDE is nowhere near dpi independent, is the easiest and best 
 way to do this imho. Otherwise we should just patch KIcon to return an icon 
 size based on the screen dpi … but we don't use SVG icons and only have a 
 limited amount of icon sizes (there is for example no 96x96 which is double 
 48x48 icon), so I see no other way.

Just checked, the view does indeed use the Desktop icons (not only group but 
also size) and simply caps them when they're  60x60 - what is obviously even 
wronger than wrong ;-)
So fixed it must be, question is how - ie. is using the Desktop size really 
intended here or just some hardcoded messup between 48 and Desktop?

Mho is that this is not the desktop and the user cannot actually expect the 
desktop size to be used here and while s/he might be happy with apple-a-like 3 
or 4 128px icons on the desktop, that size renders the dialog unusable on even 
wuxga - not to mention all those 1366x768 notebooks.

 should just patch KIcon to return an icon size based on the screen dpi
You mean when you ask for the Desktop icon size? Otherwise no option (you 
cannot return a 128px icon when the user code explcitly asked for 64px since 
you don't know what it's used for)

 there is for example no 96x96 which is double 48x48 icon
- nearest integer, eg. coming from 72dpi, the correct size for 200dpi would be 
133.33px - 128px (but of course there's always a chance that you run into a 
gap between the available sizes)

If you seriously want to get KDE hires supportive, there must be fixes reg. the 
usable icon sizes (in doubt via a dumb lanczos scale or some pixel art 
algorithm) and global dpi awareness of the paintdevice.

For the particular situation, relying on the desktop size is actually 
reasonable due to the mentioned bug, but that cannot be a global strategy :-(


- Thomas


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/#review25844
---


On Jan. 20, 2013, 11:15 a.m., Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/
 ---
 
 (Updated Jan. 20, 2013, 11:15 a.m.)
 
 
 Review request for kdelibs and KDE Usability.
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 This makes the KIconDialog (the dialog where you can choose icons for eg. 
 folders) respect the global icon size. Almost all sizes were hardcoded but 
 the patch does away with all of this and works fine with all icon sizes and 
 big font sizes. Also made it aware of FontMetrics (atm with bigger fonts, 
 they also get clipped) and adjusts the grid height accordingly.
 
 Was fun diving into that ancient code :)
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   kio/kfile/kicondialog.cpp b7d646f 
 
 Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 Yup, see screenshot.
 
 The only issue that remains is the initial size of the dialog to make it show 
 4 rows of icons. In the current implementation it just adds another 100px to 
 the dialog height (cf. line 490), which is easy, if all the sizes are known 
 and fixed, but with variing sizes this becomes an issue and I could not think 
 of a proper solution. I probably need to add a sizeHint (tried in the private 
 class, didn't help there)? The easiest but not neccessarily best solution 
 would be to just set the minimumHeight to 4 rows and done.
 
 
 File Attachments
 
 
 Icon Dialog with 200dpi
   
 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2013/01/20/icondialog.png
 Icon Dialog with 200dpi (without patch)
   
 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2013/01/20/icondialog2.png
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Kai Uwe Broulik