Re: Review Request 122556: Bump Qt version to 5.4

2017-01-20 Thread Arjun AK
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122556/ --- (Updated Jan. 20, 2017, 11:32 p.m.) Status -- This change has been

Re: Review Request 122556: Bump Qt version to 5.4

2015-08-09 Thread Luigi Toscano
On Ago. 9, 2015, 3:33 p.m., Nikita Skovoroda wrote: What's the status of this? Dolphin (and maybe some other apps) already depends on 5.4. Nikita Skovoroda wrote: Plasma and Kwin require Qt 5.4 since Plasma 5.3.0 release, btw. Plasma (and Kwin, which is part of Plasma) are not

Re: Review Request 122556: Bump Qt version to 5.4

2015-08-09 Thread Nikita Skovoroda
On Авг. 9, 2015, 1:33 п.п., Nikita Skovoroda wrote: What's the status of this? Dolphin (and maybe some other apps) already depends on 5.4. Nikita Skovoroda wrote: Plasma and Kwin require Qt 5.4 since Plasma 5.3.0 release, btw. Luigi Toscano wrote: Plasma (and Kwin, which is

Re: Review Request 122556: Bump Qt version to 5.4

2015-08-09 Thread Nikita Skovoroda
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122556/#review83601 --- What's the status of this? Dolphin (and maybe some other

Re: Review Request 122556: Bump Qt version to 5.4

2015-08-09 Thread Emmanuel Pescosta
On Aug. 9, 2015, 3:33 p.m., Nikita Skovoroda wrote: What's the status of this? Dolphin (and maybe some other apps) already depends on 5.4. Nikita Skovoroda wrote: Plasma and Kwin require Qt 5.4 since Plasma 5.3.0 release, btw. Luigi Toscano wrote: Plasma (and Kwin, which is

Re: Review Request 122556: Bump Qt version to 5.4

2015-08-09 Thread Nikita Skovoroda
On Авг. 9, 2015, 1:33 п.п., Nikita Skovoroda wrote: What's the status of this? Dolphin (and maybe some other apps) already depends on 5.4. Plasma and Kwin require Qt 5.4 since Plasma 5.3.0 release, btw. - Nikita --- This is an

Re: Review Request 122556: Bump Qt version to 5.4

2015-02-17 Thread Emmanuel Pescosta
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122556/#review76210 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Emmanuel Pescosta On Feb. 13, 2015,

Re: Review Request 122556: Bump Qt version to 5.4

2015-02-14 Thread Frank Reininghaus
On Feb. 13, 2015, 10:39 nachm., Marko Käning wrote: I'd vote for keeping it compatible to Qt 5.3, if that's possible. Inge Wallin wrote: +1. Depending on 5.4 in applications already is bad enough even though it can sometimes be necessary but I am against it for our base stuff.

Re: Review Request 122556: Bump Qt version to 5.4

2015-02-13 Thread Martin Gräßlin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122556/#review75971 --- AFAIK our CI system doesn't support Qt 5.4 yet. I think we

Re: Review Request 122556: Bump Qt version to 5.4

2015-02-13 Thread Kevin Funk
On Feb. 13, 2015, 8:41 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: AFAIK our CI system doesn't support Qt 5.4 yet. I think we should first ensure the CI system is prepared for building with the new dependency. Albert Astals Cid wrote: It does

Re: Review Request 122556: Bump Qt version to 5.4

2015-02-13 Thread Albert Astals Cid
On feb. 13, 2015, 8:41 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: AFAIK our CI system doesn't support Qt 5.4 yet. I think we should first ensure the CI system is prepared for building with the new dependency. It does http://build.kde.org/job/kde-baseapps_master_qt5/238/consoleFull qt5 - Branch

Review Request 122556: Bump Qt version to 5.4

2015-02-13 Thread Arjun AK
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122556/ --- Review request for KDE Base Apps. Repository: kde-baseapps Description

Re: Review Request 122556: Bump Qt version to 5.4

2015-02-13 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
On Feb. 13, 2015, 9:41 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: AFAIK our CI system doesn't support Qt 5.4 yet. I think we should first ensure the CI system is prepared for building with the new dependency. Albert Astals Cid wrote: It does

Re: Review Request 122556: Bump Qt version to 5.4

2015-02-13 Thread Marko Käning
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122556/#review76012 --- I'd vote for keeping it compatible to Qt 5.3, if that's

Re: Review Request 122556: Bump Qt version to 5.4

2015-02-13 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Feb. 13, 2015, 8:41 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: AFAIK our CI system doesn't support Qt 5.4 yet. I think we should first ensure the CI system is prepared for building with the new dependency. Albert Astals Cid wrote: It does

Re: Review Request 122556: Bump Qt version to 5.4

2015-02-13 Thread Inge Wallin
On Feb. 13, 2015, 11:39 p.m., Marko Käning wrote: I'd vote for keeping it compatible to Qt 5.3, if that's possible. +1. Depending on 5.4 in applications already is bad enough even though it can sometimes be necessary but I am against it for our base stuff. Especially in this case where