2011/9/28 Rolf Eike Beer k...@opensource.sf-tec.de:
Am Mittwoch, 28. September 2011, 15:47:25 schrieb Josef Weidendorfer:
On Wednesday 28 September 2011, Jaime Torres Amate wrote:
and the removal of a for loop (I'm checking it this has been this way
since the beginning, or if fixing it
Hello Romain,
Thank you for the constructive answers. :)
In a case like that, ask the maintainer(s). Usually, developers know the
code of their program :) .
Also, feel free to ask for help on IRC or through the bugzilla.
Sure, this can be done. But if every (possible) contributor asks the
On Wednesday 28 September 2011, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
What happens if inPos is -1? pos becomes 0 then. Then we iterate over the
whole list just to do if (... pos != 0) which will never be true. So for
this case (inPos == -1) the whole function can be avoided at all as it will
never return
Hi,
as you probably already know, a decision was recently made that kdelibs 4.7
would be the last 4.x release series of kdelibs, and work would be ongoing in
the 5.0 (frameworks) and 4.7 (KDE/4.7) branches only. I think this is a huge
mistake, for several reasons (the TL/DR crowd can stop
Thanks so much Martin and Dario. I'll get you in contact with the student.
Cheers
Lydia
--
Lydia Pintscher
KDE Community Working Group member
http://kde.org - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher
For example, when we switched our default
spell checker in Fedora from aspell to hunspell in Fedora 9 (i.e. 4.0
era), I
had to add support for hunspell to kdelibs3, or our users would have had
to
install 2 spell checkers to use KDE apps! (Even several apps in the
default
KDE installation
On Donnerstag 29 September 2011 14:01:50 Kevin Kofler wrote:
2. It will be confusing to our users, and even to some packagers, to have a
KDE SC 4.8 on kdelibs 4.7.
Since almost exactly 2 years we (esp. the promo team) are communicating that
Platform/Frameworks, Applications and Workspaces are
Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
(re the support for spellchecking with hunspell)
Given that it is now proven and tested code, who stops you committing it
into KDE/3.5 branch?
What for? There are no plans to do a 3.5.11 or 3.6.0 release, ever, and the
one major distribution known to sometimes ship
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 03:27:58 PM Markus Slopianka wrote:
On Donnerstag 29 September 2011 14:01:50 Kevin Kofler wrote:
2. It will be confusing to our users, and even to some packagers, to
have a KDE SC 4.8 on kdelibs 4.7.
Since almost exactly 2 years we (esp. the promo team) are
Markus Slopianka wrote:
On Donnerstag 29 September 2011 14:01:50 Kevin Kofler wrote:
2. It will be confusing to our users, and even to some packagers, to have
a KDE SC 4.8 on kdelibs 4.7.
Since almost exactly 2 years we (esp. the promo team) are communicating
that Platform/Frameworks,
Scott Kitterman wrote:
We did this in Kubuntu and it was confusing. It was also technically
challenging. Speaking as someone investing a lot of time in trying to do
a high quality job of distributing KDE to end users: Please. Never, ever,
do this to us again.
+1
The transition from
On Thursday 29 September 2011, Heinz Wiesinger wrote:
From what I remember from the desktop summit the picture you draw here is
quite an exaggeration of what is actually happening.
kdelibs 4.7 is meant to be frozen for new features, but not for bugfixes.
Bugfix releases of kdelibs-4.7
On Thursday 29 September 2011, Kevin Kofler wrote:
On Thursday 29 September 2011, Heinz Wiesinger wrote:
...
The KDE Frameworks 5.0 development is not meant to take forever. In fact
I think it's meant to be finished around early 2012, which would leave
us with a frozen kdelibs for one KDE
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102723/
---
(Updated Sept. 29, 2011, 6:25 p.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102723/#review6919
---
Ship it!
- Josef Weidendorfer
On Sept. 29, 2011, 6:25 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102723/#review6920
---
This review has been submitted with commit
Without judging on the other arguments which look very reasonable to me...
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
2. It will be confusing to our users, and even to some packagers, to have a
KDE SC 4.8 on kdelibs 4.7. [...]
...what exactly stops you from
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102691/#review6927
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Andreas Hartmetz
On Sept. 25, 2011,
On Sept. 25, 2011, 2:20 p.m., Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
I'd actually be interested to hear which testing you did.
The ResolveHostNamesBeforeProxyCheck option seems strange. In which
situations is this supposed to be set / not set?
Dawit Alemayehu wrote:
The
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102729/#review6926
---
Sorry, but this is simply wrong. There is a specific reason why
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 21:43:34 Stefan Majewsky wrote:
Without judging on the other arguments which look very reasonable to
me...
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
wrote:
2. It will be confusing to our users, and even to some packagers, to
have a
A Dijous, 29 de setembre de 2011, Kevin Kofler vàreu escriure:
Hi,
as you probably already know, a decision was recently made that kdelibs 4.7
would be the last 4.x release series of kdelibs, and work would be ongoing
in the 5.0 (frameworks) and 4.7 (KDE/4.7) branches only. I think this is a
A Dijous, 29 de setembre de 2011, Scott Kitterman vàreu escriure:
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 08:01:00 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
On Thursday 29 September 2011, Heinz Wiesinger wrote:
From what I remember from the desktop summit the picture you draw
here
is
quite an exaggeration of
A Dijous, 29 de setembre de 2011, Andras Mantia vàreu escriure:
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 21:43:34 Stefan Majewsky wrote:
Without judging on the other arguments which look very reasonable to
me...
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
wrote:
2. It
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102657/#review6934
---
The places model is dynamic (as devices can come and go
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 11:47:22 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Dijous, 29 de setembre de 2011, Scott Kitterman vàreu escriure:
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 08:01:00 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
On Thursday 29 September 2011, Heinz Wiesinger wrote:
From what I remember from the
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 11:47:55 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
...
That is actually Dirk's plan (or at least that is what i remember from the
Release Team BoF in Berlin).
...
Are the results of this BoF published anywhere?
Scott K
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102691/#review6937
---
This review has been submitted with commit
28 matches
Mail list logo
