Re: [kcalc][kcharselect][kcron] Merged frameworks branch to master, now KF5 based

Christoph Feck ha scritto: > Hi, > > I just merged the "frameworks" KF5 porting branches of the following > applications to "master" branch: > > - kcalc > - kcharselect > - kcron > > These applications will be released as KF5 applications for the KDE > Applications 15.03 release. > > Please c

Re: LibRingClient has moved to extragear/network

Elv1313 . ha scritto: > Hi, > > After going through kdereview for the last few weeks, libringclient > (formerly the sflphone-kde client logic library) is now moving to KDE > extragear. I am currently starting to remove the legacy Qt4 support > still required by the KDE4 client (and porting it to k

Re: Review Request 122652: Use correct default value when UDS_ACCESS/UDS_FILE_TYPE is not set

> On Feb. 25, 2015, 6:57 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote: > > I "think" this is OK, but just don't know. > > > > Anyway, your diff is for kdelibs (KDE SC 4.xx). I don't know if that gets > > another release. Either way, KIO frameworks [1] is where this should be > > applied to when you get a ship it.

Re: Review Request 119363: Port kde-baseapps to use docbook 4.5

time. The encoding issue has been addressed in the following two reviews: * kdoctools: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120648/ * kdelibs4support: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120649/ which are now pushed and closed. So this review can be closed. - Luigi Toscano On Aug. 24, 2014, 6:33

Re: Review Request 122812: Fix BIC introduced in kdelibs 4

> On March 4, 2015, 10:19 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Given the BIC change is already part of 4.14.6 i'd say we just ignore it, > > it's not like anyone cares for that symbol, right? Is it already out? If not, no way to skip 4.14.6 or mark it as "don't use it" for distributions (or tell

Re: Review Request 122812: Fix BIC introduced in kdelibs 4

> On March 4, 2015, 10:19 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Given the BIC change is already part of 4.14.6 i'd say we just ignore it, > > it's not like anyone cares for that symbol, right? > > Luigi Toscano wrote: > Is it already out? If not, no way to sk

Re: Review Request 122652: Use correct default value when UDS_ACCESS/UDS_FILE_TYPE is not set

hould be > > applied to when you get a ship it. > > [1] http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=kio.git > > Luigi Toscano wrote: > kdelibs 4.14 still receives fixes and it's released with KDE Applications > (at least as long as we have kdelibs4-based applications). So, if it

Re: Review Request 122987: Allow user to specify path to myspell dictionary files

this is still relevant for the Sonnet framework? - Luigi Toscano On March 17, 2015, 1:22 p.m., Eugene Shalygin wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.

Re: Review Request 122987: Allow user to specify path to myspell dictionary files

> On March 17, 2015, 1:41 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote: > > (not entitled to give a ship it, but) have you checked if this is still > > relevant for the Sonnet framework? Ups, this review is for sonnet; I was confused by the group (please use kdeframeworks instead of kdelibs

Re: GCompris in kdereview

On Monday 30 of March 2015 11:56:13 Luca Beltrame wrote: > Bruno Coudoin wrote: > > As we cannot have a translated stable branch and we need to > > Perhaps naive question: why? I think temporarily as they are in kdereview. We never had a stable branch for kdereview, maybe because it was meant fo

Re: Moving KDots to KDE Review

Minh Ngo ha scritto: > Hi folks, > > I would like to move my project [1] to KDE Reviews and receive some feedback > to make it become a part of the KDEGames project in prospect. > > According to the wiki article [2] I have to contact with sysadmins and post > this message in this mail list. Few

Re: Distros and QtWebEngine

Jan Kundrát ha scritto: > On Monday, 20 April 2015 21:14:51 CEST, Sune Vuorela wrote: >> And Red Hat is following Fedora. > > RHEL might not be a good example here because they are a rather a strange > beast. RHEL has actually never shipped QtWebKit (!) and they also aren't > shipping Qt5 so far.

Re: Distros and QtWebEngine

Albert Astals Cid ha scritto: > El Dilluns, 20 d'abril de 2015, a les 15:52:12, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez > Meyer va escriure: > >> I could also say that Fedora+Debian+Debian derivatives (Ubuntu is mostly in >> the same position as us) is also a large userbase for KDE to loose. >> >> But *it'

Re: Distros and QtWebEngine

Milian Wolff ha scritto: > I'm not a KDE PIM maintainer, but with my KDevelop hat > on (that uses a web view to display documentation pages, currently QtWebKit), kio_man uses khtml (why don't you use it)? But anyway, also khtml is deprecated. On the other side, the html for manpages is pretty ba

Re: Review Request 123458: Improvements to the handling of font weights and styles

icult they will accept it, as Qt4 is in hard freeze mode), and they will probably ask to see if it applies to Qt5 as well. We just mirror Qt... not sure how to handle this. - Luigi Toscano On April 22, 2015, 12:06 a.m., René J.V. Bertin

Re: Review Request 123458: Improvements to the handling of font weights and styles

> On April 22, 2015, 12:40 a.m., Luigi Toscano wrote: > > I think this should go to Qt (I think it's quite difficult they will accept > > it, as Qt4 is in hard freeze mode), and they will probably ask to see if it > > applies to Qt5 as well. > > We just mirror Q

Re: kwallet-query moved to kdereview

Valentin Rusu ha scritto: > * Allen Winter [2015-04-23 17:32:32 -0400]: > >> On Thursday, April 23, 2015 10:25:20 PM Valentin Rusu wrote: >>> This is a rather simple script and I think it should go to kde-utils. >>> I'd like to write a manpage for it, buy AFAICT that's not the KDE way of >>> doin

Re: kwallet-query moved to kdereview

Valentin Rusu ha scritto: > The kwallet-query tool is now part of KF5::Wallet. I'll now request > kdereview/kwallet-query repository removal. src/runtime/kwallet-query/src/querydriver.cpp:153:47: error: ‘class QByteArray’ has no member named ‘toStdString’ std::cout << QJsonDocument(json).toJ

Re: Frameworks compiler and Qt requirements after Qt 5.7?

On Friday 26 of June 2015 16:24:50 Mark Gaiser wrote: > Hi, > > If Qt's plans progress according to what they post on the mailinglist then > Qt 5.6 will be LTS, 5.7 will up the compiler requirements to the following: > > GCC 4.7 > Clang 3.2 > MSVC 2012 > > Framework currently requires: > GCC 4.5

Re: Moving akonadi from kdesupport and akonadi-search from playground

Daniel Vrátil ha scritto: > Hi all, > > we (the KDE PIM team) kinda screwed up when we forgot to communicate our > intentions about > next KDE PIM release with the release team and we ended up in a situation that > we have > some repositories in modules from which they cannot be released as part o

Re: [kdelibs/KDE/4.14] cmake/modules: Remove policy settings from FindKDE4Internal.

Allen Winter ha scritto: > Stephen, > > For years I have passed -DKDE4_ENABLE_HTMLHANDBOOK=1 to cmake when building > KDE projects. > As of today I get this error: > > CMake Error at cmake/modules/KDE4Macros.cmake:315 (add_custom_target): > add_custom_target cannot create target "htmlhandbook"

Re: Moving akonadi from kdesupport and akonadi-search from playground

laurent Montel ha scritto: > Le Monday 20 July 2015, 22:58:39 Luigi Toscano a écrit : >> Daniel Vrátil ha scritto: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> we (the KDE PIM team) kinda screwed up when we forgot to communicate our >>> intentions about >>> next KDE

Notes from the Phabricator BoF

Hi all, thanks to Victor Blazquez, here are the notes from the Phabricator BoF. Feel free to add your comments and corrections. Feedback on Phabricator gathered outside the BoF from people who could not attend: - k

Re: Notes from the Phabricator BoF

Il 30 luglio 2015 22:42:44 CEST, Kevin Kofler ha scritto: > Luigi Toscano wrote: > > Feedback on Phabricator gathered outside the BoF from people who > could not > > attend: > > Were there no complaints about the fact that you can still not view > anything > at

Re: Plasma Applet for Audio Volume for kdereview

Jonathan Riddell ha scritto: > plasma-pa is a new volume manager and is intended to be a replacement for > KMix in Plasma. > > We plan to ship it as a beta in Plasma 5.4 and it's currently in kdereview > for your reviewing attention. > > https://projects.kde.org/projects/kdereview/plasma-pa >

Review Request 124657: Show URL again in bookmarks view and URL texbox

e949469 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124657/diff/ Testing --- Compiled, executed the bookmark editor. Added and changed few bookmarks, the URL is correctly updated. Thanks, Luigi Toscano

Re: Review Request 124657: Show URL again in bookmarks view and URL texbox

) - keditbookmarks/bookmarkinfowidget.cpp 98ce303 keditbookmarks/kbookmarkmodel/model.cpp e949469 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124657/diff/ Testing --- Compiled, executed the bookmark editor. Added and changed few bookmarks, the URL is correctly updated. Thanks, Luigi

Re: Review Request 124657: Show URL again in bookmarks view and URL texbox

marked as submitted. Review request for KDE Base Apps and David Faure. Changes --- Submitted with commit 64e8b30cf24623c52595efca3f57bc776c5ca188 by Luigi Toscano to branch frameworks. Repository: kde-baseapps Description --- Fix two KUrl porting TODO items. Thanks to the porting

Re: Review Request 122556: Bump Qt version to 5.4

> On Ago. 9, 2015, 3:33 p.m., Nikita Skovoroda wrote: > > What's the status of this? > > Dolphin (and maybe some other apps) already depends on 5.4. > > Nikita Skovoroda wrote: > Plasma and Kwin require Qt 5.4 since Plasma 5.3.0 release, btw. Plasma (and Kwin, which is part of Plasma) are n

Re: Updating our tools

Michael Pyne ha scritto: > On Sun, August 9, 2015 09:58:26 Allen Winter wrote: >> On Sunday, August 09, 2015 09:35:06 PM Ben Cooksley wrote: >>> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 3:15 AM, Allen Winter wrote: On Saturday, August 08, 2015 04:59:49 PM Elvis Angelaccio wrote: > Sorry to bump this old th

Documentation (was Re: Plasma Applet for Audio Volume for kdereview)

On Wednesday 12 of August 2015 10:05:34 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > Also, the Evolve survey was pretty clear that we utterly suck in the > documentation arena. Playing with words doesn't solve that, writing > documentation and maintaining it does. > > We may change the rules, and that's perhaps what

Re: Using nullptr instead of Q_NULLPTR

On Thursday 13 of August 2015 12:59:01 Ivan Čukić wrote: > >> I prefer the first option, it's the way forward and if someone was using > > > > I'd say that requiring a newer gcc just like that would go against the > > nature of the KF5 project. > > I don't really see why it is "against the nature

Re: Using nullptr instead of Q_NULLPTR

On Thursday 13 of August 2015 15:01:16 Ivan Čukić wrote: > > What I don't like in this story is that we set up a rule, an promise with > > users, which was broken and now it's like it does not matter. > > Yes, we did set up the rule requirements for gcc 4.5 and MSVC10 back in > 2013. > > Since th

Re: Proposal to improving KDE Software Repository Organization

David Faure ha scritto: > On Sunday 16 August 2015 13:51:29 Michael Pyne wrote: >> There's no reason even with our current build metadata that we'd *have* to >> have project hierarchies, as long as each underlying git repository name >> remains unique. It might even make things easier since there

Re: Bringing back rsibreak from unmaintained

Jan Kundrát ha scritto: > On Monday, 17 August 2015 20:04:04 CEST, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> Other comments? > > Nice, happy to see it -- it builds here, with a bunch of warnings: > > [2/29] Generating index.cache.bz2 > index.docbook:2: element para: validity error : ID gnu-fdl already defined

Re: kdesudo in git

On Thursday 20 of August 2015 12:16:55 Jonathan Riddell wrote: > I've just moved kdesudo into playground > > playground/utils/kdesudo > > it has a bunch of translations from its previous home on Launchpad. > > Could these be imported into KDE please? Do we really need it? I thought that kdesu c

Re: [kde-doc-english] The new data dirs and kf5 docs

On Thursday 20 of August 2015 14:46:45 Yuri Chornoivan wrote: > Hi, Hi, CC: kde-core-devel@ for some help (see below). > > As it was pointed by Burkhard [1], the paths in kf5 docs should be > updated/fixed to the new configuration. > > The list is rather big now: > > fundamentals/config.docboo

Re: kdesudo in git

On Thursday 20 of August 2015 11:48:25 Jonathan Riddell wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 01:34:42PM +0200, Luigi Toscano wrote: > > On Thursday 20 of August 2015 12:16:55 Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > > I've just moved kdesudo into playground > > > > > > pla

Re: Review Request 124824: [OS X] FindKDE4Internal.cmake : reintroduce a cmake_minimum_required statement

> On Ago. 19, 2015, 8:06 p.m., Stephen Kelly wrote: > > This patch is not correct. > > > > What repo were you trying to build? Add cmake_minimum_required(VERSION > > 2.8.9) there. > > Stephen Kelly wrote: > Why did this review go quiet? Did you pull and realize that line was > already th

Re: Review Request 125043: expose the WheelMouseZooms global setting through the input ("mouse") KCM

> On Set. 4, 2015, 3:21 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > kcontrol/input/kmousedlg.ui, line 82 > > > > > > You *must* ask the i18n team about this (requires an exception) on > > kde-...@kde.org > > > > Sin

Re: Review Request 125043: expose the WheelMouseZooms global setting through the input ("mouse") KCM

> On Set. 4, 2015, 3:38 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > You are aware that this is a dead repo and that this is a new feature for a > > repository that has been feature frozen for years? > > > > Given that I think this should not and never be merged. If you want to keep > > the repo going for

Re: Review Request 125043: expose the WheelMouseZooms global setting through the input ("mouse") KCM

icially supported LTS > version, and I'd hope they too would be interested in upstream fixes. As such > I don't see the point in creating another branch, or in maintaining a freeze > on a branch that isn't going to see any more releases > A separate repository wit

Re: Review Request 125068: Make Format Painter work in KRichTextWidget

> On Set. 7, 2015, 10:12 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Ship It! Is the fix relevant for to the ktextwidgets framework as well? - Luigi --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/

Re: Moving KDE Connect out of playground

On Thursday 10 of September 2015 02:33:55 Albert Vaca wrote: > +kde-core-devel > > Hi, > > With the latest changes we are making to KDE Connect as part of the sprint > in Randa, I think that the project is becoming mature enough to be moved > out of playground. Not only that, but Kubuntu and othe

Re: Moving KDE Connect out of playground

Albert Vaca ha scritto: > Our awesome sysadmins already moved the two repos (kdeconnect-android and > kdeconnect-kde) to Review. > I moved the translations for both repositories. Please update the translations branches for kdeconnect-android so that trunk_kf5 is master and trunk is none; yes, it'

Re: Moving KDE Connect out of playground

On Tuesday 15 of September 2015 08:01:44 Albert Vaca wrote: > I don't think that having "descriptive documentation" (more about this > later) is that important nowadays, and IMO users will likely google for > help way before they use the help button when they find issues. Since most > people I talk

Re: Moving KDE Connect out of playground

On Tuesday 15 of September 2015 09:06:40 Jeremy Whiting wrote: > I see your points and actually agree. I'm completely ok with having > help go to some online documentation on userbase. I see the > requirement for offline/included help documentation to be going down > lately as you say and completel

Re: Moving Kapture to KDEGraphics

On Thursday 17 of September 2015 17:43:08 Boudhayan Gupta wrote: > Hi, > > Kapture (formerly KScreenGenie) has been in review for a couple of > months now. I've just finished the rename, which I believe was the > last pending task before moving to KDE Graphics. Please also rename the template fil

Re: Review Request 125560: Give unique names to the targets created by KDE4Macros.cmake

KDocTools, so generating longer, unique target names. The change is basically the same and it has been throughly tested. I would wait few days and if no one else object, I would give a ship it. - Luigi Toscano On Ott. 8, 2015, 7:38 p.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote

Re: Help please. Kdoctools build.

Scarlett Clark ha scritto: > I need some help please. I am working through a new rebuild on my sandbox CI > system and I was quickly halted due to kdoctools.I am not even sure where to > start with this. > > https://build-sandbox.kde.org/job/kdoctools%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc

Re: Help please. Kdoctools build.

Albert Astals Cid ha scritto: > El Friday 27 November 2015, a les 15:41:26, Scarlett Clark va escriure: >> I need some help please. I am working through a new rebuild on my sandbox >> CI system and I was quickly halted due to kdoctools.I am not even sure >> where to start with this. >> >> https://b

Re: Fwd: RFC: Enabling -DECM_ENABLE_SANITIZERS='address' in jenkins

Scarlett Clark ha scritto: > Resent - meant for list. > Help please folks, I need someone with more knowledge with gcc and compiler > flags / settings. In the meantime, could you please reenable ASAN? I fixed few leaks in kdoctools itself (my fault, right), so I'd like to see if there are real lea

Re: Policy regarding QtWebKit and QtScript

Pau Garcia i Quiles ha scritto: > > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:02 PM, Albert Astals Cid > wrote: > > > > Soon Qt 5.6 will be released and with it, 2 quite widely used > > frameworks will disappear: QtWebKit and QtScript. Also QtQuick 1, but > > I think this

Re: Review Request 125910: Fix for Bug 334525 - Gwenview hangs when switching from normal to full screen mode

frameworks, not to kdelibs. - Luigi Toscano On Dic. 29, 2015, 9:54 p.m., Johannes Stefan wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.

Re: Review Request 125910: Fix for Bug 334525 - Gwenview hangs when switching from normal to full screen mode

> On Dic. 30, 2015, 3:48 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote: > > For the record: this was submitted to the knotifications frameworks, not to > > kdelibs. > > Martin Klapetek wrote: > Yes, sorry, I wrote it as a message here but now I see that it didn't get > through

Re: Review Request 125910: Fix for Bug 334525 - Gwenview hangs when switching from normal to full screen mode

> On Dic. 30, 2015, 3:48 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote: > > For the record: this was submitted to the knotifications frameworks, not to > > kdelibs. > > Martin Klapetek wrote: > Yes, sorry, I wrote it as a message here but now I see that it didn't get > through

Re: KActivities repository split

Ivan Čukić ha scritto: > Hi everyone, > > As previously announced, KActivities has been split into a few > separate repositories. This mail is mostly intended to notify our dear > packagers of the change, and the plan for the transition period. > > KActivities framework 5.19 (as released a few da

Re: mailing list archive gone ?

Martin Koller ha scritto: > On Saturday 27 February 2016 17:02:27 Thomas Lübking wrote: >> On Samstag, 27. Februar 2016 16:09:00 CEST, Martin Koller wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/ >>> >>> shows only 3 mails from the year 2000. >>> Where are the other archives

Re: KDE file dialog

Martin Koller ha scritto: > In KDE4 times there was a common file dialog for the applications, I think > this is what KFileDialog was made for. > Now where some applications are already ported to KF5, there seems to be no > such thing anymore > (or it does not work here). > KFileDialog is depreca

Re: KDE file dialog

Martin Koller ha scritto: > On Sunday 28 February 2016 15:58:20 Luigi Toscano wrote: >> Martin Koller ha scritto: >>> In KDE4 times there was a common file dialog for the applications, I think >>> this is what KFileDialog was made for. >>> Now where some ap

Re: Review Request 127264: Set CMP0064 to OLD to suppress CMake warnings

> On March 3, 2016, 5:54 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: > > cmake/modules/KDE4Macros.cmake, line 1003 > > > > > > Without the conditionals, the code would work just as well. > > Rohan Garg wrote: > Unless

Re: Review Request 127264: Set CMP0064 to OLD to suppress CMake warnings

t; > Rohan Garg wrote: > Unless you have a CMake so old that said policy doesn't exist. For eg. on > Debian stable :) > > Luigi Toscano wrote: > (which is still 3.0.2, so way more than the minimum required version for > Frameworks (2.8.12)) > > Rohan Gar

Re: Review Request 127264: Set CMP0064 to OLD to suppress CMake warnings

t; > Rohan Garg wrote: > Unless you have a CMake so old that said policy doesn't exist. For eg. on > Debian stable :) > > Luigi Toscano wrote: > (which is still 3.0.2, so way more than the minimum required version for > Frameworks (2.8.12)) > > Rohan Gar

Re: remove khelpcenter from next Plasma release?

On Wednesday 09 of March 2016 15:29:28 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > Hi all, > > [For the sake of sanity, please reply to both list, this topic affects > applications and Plasma.] > > One of the topics we are discussing at the current Plasma sprint is whether > we really want khelpcenter as part of t

Re: remove khelpcenter from next Plasma release?

On Wednesday 09 of March 2016 16:16:54 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On Wednesday, March 09, 2016 17:05:14 Luigi Toscano wrote: > > That said, I perceive this email as "khelpcenter is not welcome in > > Plasma", > > probably with a maintainer ("hell-bent on keepin

Re: remove khelpcenter from next Plasma release?

On Wednesday 09 of March 2016 16:50:39 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On Wednesday, March 09, 2016 17:30:01 Luigi Toscano wrote: > > > Let me cut right to the chase, do you want to maintain it? Does it need > > > to > > > be in Plasma? > > > > Yes, I can ma

Re: remove khelpcenter from next Plasma release?

Luigi Toscano ha scritto: > On Wednesday 09 of March 2016 16:50:39 Sebastian Kügler wrote: >> On Wednesday, March 09, 2016 17:30:01 Luigi Toscano wrote: >>>> Let me cut right to the chase, do you want to maintain it? Does it need >>>> to >>>> be in Pl

Re: Reviewboard timing (was Re: Sunsetting of Infrastructure and the Phabricator migration)

Ben Cooksley ha scritto: > On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:12 AM, Luigi Toscano > wrote: >> On Friday 18 of March 2016 19:46:03 Ben Cooksley wrote: >>> In terms of Reviewboard, there are no plans to import it's contents >>> into Phabricator, as the level of effort re

Re: remove khelpcenter from next Plasma release?

Luigi Toscano ha scritto: > Luigi Toscano ha scritto: >> On Wednesday 09 of March 2016 16:50:39 Sebastian Kügler wrote: >>> On Wednesday, March 09, 2016 17:30:01 Luigi Toscano wrote: >>>>> Let me cut right to the chase, do you want to maintain it? Does it

Reviewboard timing (was Re: Sunsetting of Infrastructure and the Phabricator migration)

On Friday 18 of March 2016 19:46:03 Ben Cooksley wrote: > In terms of Reviewboard, there are no plans to import it's contents > into Phabricator, as the level of effort required is too high. Once we > are migrated to Phabricator for reviews, i'm proposing that everyone > has 4 weeks to finish any f

Re: remove khelpcenter from next Plasma release?

On Thursday 17 of March 2016 11:54:31 Aaron Honeycutt wrote: > Kubuntu uses it for our Documentation but our current tools do have a PDF > export option as well as epub so we could use a different tool to read > those files without khelpcenter. I do thank every developer for his/her > work and curr

Re: [Kde-pim] Qt 4 Builds

laurent Montel ha scritto: > Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 11:58:07 CEST Kevin Kofler a écrit : >> laurent Montel wrote: >>> We will not create more release from kdepim4, no distro uses it even >>> debian :) >> >> Fedora will ship (it's currently under review) a kdepim4 package containing >> KNode and

Re: [Kde-pim] Qt 4 Builds

laurent Montel ha scritto: > Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 14:02:26 CEST Luigi Toscano a écrit : >> laurent Montel ha scritto: >>> Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 11:58:07 CEST Kevin Kofler a écrit : >>>> laurent Montel wrote: >>>>> We will not create more

Review Request 127515: Port away keditbookmarks from KCmdLine* and K4AboutData

5f17a98 keditbookmarks/main.cpp 4302318 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127515/diff/ Testing --- Compile, the two programs can run, now with proper version details. No apparent regression in parameter parsing. Thanks, Luigi Toscano

Re: Review Request 127515: Port away keditbookmarks from KCmdLine* and K4AboutData

automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127515/#review94104 --- On March 28, 2016, 6:06 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote: > > --- > T

Re: Review Request 127515: Port away keditbookmarks from KCmdLine* and K4AboutData

apparent regression in parameter parsing. Thanks, Luigi Toscano

Re: Review Request 127515: Port away keditbookmarks from KCmdLine* and K4AboutData

marked as submitted. Review request for KDE Base Apps and David Faure. Changes --- Submitted with commit f7266d77bd11c678689bc64bdc5697f7ad1c76fd by Luigi Toscano to branch frameworks. Repository: kde-baseapps Description --- Starting point: the output of convert-kcmdlineargs.pl

Re: kdewebkit?

On Thursday 21 of April 2016 08:45:44 Scarlett Clark wrote: > https://build.kde.org/job/kdewebkit%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compil > er=gcc/32/console > > And if I understand correctly, qt webkit is no more? So should this project > be removed from CI? IIRC as long as we support Qt <5.6,

Re: kolourpaint now KF5 based

Martin Koller ha scritto: > Hi all, > > just wanted to let you know that I have now completed the kolourpaint port to > KF5 > and this is now in its master branch. I have also updated kde-build-metadata > Hope I did all correct. I'm going to update the i18n branches on repo-metadata (which gener

Re: Can't release applications

On Wednesday, 27 July 2016 12:22:45 CEST Aleix Pol wrote: > Hi, > There's a major blocker when trying to release applications nowadays. > To update the stable branch one needs to commit to the > kde:sysadmin/repo-metadata.git repository, which can't be accessed by > KDE Project maintainers. > > Ho

Re: Review Request 128684: Proofread + update khtml-general kcm docbook

> On Ago. 16, 2016, 9:05 a.m., David Faure wrote: > > doc/kcontrol/khtml-general/index.docbook, line 51 > > > > > > Well, qt5-webkit and kwebkitpart do still exist. They're just not > > really maintained (but the

Re: Review Request 128803: Import konqueror kcm docbooks from kde-runtime master

, this change should be applied later to the split repositories. - Luigi Toscano On Ago. 30, 2016, 4:01 p.m., Burkhard Lück wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboa

Re: Splitting kde-baseapps?

On Wednesday, 14 September 2016 15:46:28 CEST Burkhard Lück wrote: > Hi, > > what is the future of the kde-basapps repo? > > It consists of: > > 1) Konqueror code + docbooks in subdirs doc, konq-plugins, konqueror + lib > > 2) kfind code + docbook in subdir kfind > > 3) kdepasswd (don't we h

Re: announcement: Kwave is in kdereview

Thomas Eschenbacher ha scritto: > Hello, > > according to > https://community.kde.org/Policies/Application_Lifecycle#Stage_2:_Stable > I hereby announce the move of Kwave to "kdereview", on it's way to > "kdemultimedia". > > Kwave is a sound editor built on KF5 and exists since November 1998. I >

Re: announcement: Kwave is in kdereview

Burkhard Lück ha scritto: > Am Sonntag, 9. Oktober 2016, 11:44:16 CEST schrieb David Faure: >> AFAIK KLocalizedString::setApplicationDomain isn't necessary, you should? >> instead define the domain as a -D flag during compilation, but I'm no expert >> on? that, check the wiki. > > https://api.kde.

Re: Dropping kdelibs4-based applications in KDE Applications 17.12

On Friday, 11 November 2016 18:24:42 CET Christoph Feck wrote: > On 11.11.2016 16:45, Dominik Haumann wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > >> Hi, my proposal would be to make KDE Applications 17.08 the last release > >> we > >> accept applications based on kdelib

Re: Kwave is in kdemultimedia now

Christoph Feck ha scritto: > On 11.11.2016 20:41, Thomas Eschenbacher wrote: >> as suggested by Ben, I hereby to inform you that today >> Kwave has been moved to kdemultimedia :) > > Thanks for your patience :) Did sysadmins also add an entry at reviewboard or > phabricator for code reviews? If no

Re: Kwave is in kdemultimedia now

Luigi Toscano ha scritto: > Christoph Feck ha scritto: >> On 11.11.2016 20:41, Thomas Eschenbacher wrote: >>> as suggested by Ben, I hereby to inform you that today >>> Kwave has been moved to kdemultimedia :) >> >> Thanks for your patience :) Did sysadm

Re: Kwave is in kdemultimedia now

On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 06:52:26 CET Thomas Eschenbacher wrote: > Luigi Toscano wrote: > > Luigi Toscano ha scritto: > >> Christoph Feck ha scritto: > >>> On 11.11.2016 20:41, Thomas Eschenbacher wrote: > >>>> as suggested by Ben, I hereby to info

Re: kio-gdrive - was - Re: New project moved to review

In data domenica 20 novembre 2016 13:24:50 CET, Elvis Angelaccio ha scritto: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Boudhayan Gupta wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I seem to have missed this discussion and since there's a ticket to > > move this I've become aware of this now, and am asking here. > > > >

Re: kio-gdrive - was - Re: New project moved to review

Elvis Angelaccio ha scritto: > > Sysadmin has moved kio-gdrive to extragear/network. > > @Luigi: can you please update the i18n metadata? I answered on IRC BUT for the record (and to avoid https://xkcd.com/979/), translations have been moved to the proper module and repo-metadata has been update

Re: Review Request 129644: i10n: update Czech Republic to Czechia

, how was handled in the sources used by Qt5 applications? I don't think we have those information in Frameworks anymore. It would maybe worth to have consistency between the value of Frameworks 5 and kdelibs4 applications. - Luigi Toscano On Dec. 13, 2016, 12:36 a.m., Jiri Bohac

Re: announcement: plymouth-kcm in kdereview

Jonathan Riddell ha scritto: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 12:58:10PM +0100, Marco Martin wrote: >> Hi all, >> announcing a new KCM module to change the plymouth splash screen >> The repository is named plymouth-kcm and is headed for kdereview now. >> its final resting place would be the workspace area

Re: imagewriter in kdereview

Jonathan Riddell ha scritto: > Please review imagewriter which I've just had moved to kdereview. > > It's a simple tool to write ISO images to a USB key. It should be > cross platform and work on Linux, mac, windows. > > It's based on ROSA Image Writer and the ROSA maintainer has agreed to > mai

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

On Monday, 19 June 2017 18:50:23 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello, > > On Tuesday, 13 June 2017 00:07:01 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Have you read the page that speaks about how to write Messages.sh files? > > It's quite good. Please read it and explain what you don't understand. > > It's m

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

Kevin Ottens ha scritto: > Hello, > > On Monday, 19 June 2017 18:56:39 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: >> On Monday, 19 June 2017 18:50:23 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: >>> On Tuesday, 13 June 2017 00:07:01 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: >>>> Have you read the page that s

Re: Ksysguard dev

On Monday, 19 June 2017 20:50:25 CEST Alexandre Biche wrote: > Hi guys, > I want to add network I/O stats to ksysguard but I you closed > kde-workspace's github repo and I don't find the plasma 5 github repo. > Can you give me the way to start contributing please Github is a mirror; kde-workspace

Re: Moving AtCore to Extragear

Albert Astals Cid ha scritto: > El diumenge, 18 de juny de 2017, a les 9:48:07 CEST, Lays Rodrigues va > escriure: >> Hey guys, good morning. =D >> Any more comments on AtCore code? >> How the moving to Extragear work? > > Are you planning to at least answer my last comments saying "we don't real

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

On Friday, 23 June 2017 16:08:31 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello, > > On Tuesday, 20 June 2017 22:14:33 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: > > On Monday, 19 June 2017 21:50:16 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: > > > [...] > > > I'm not sure why you didn't like the above

Re: AtCore on KDE Review

Lays Rodrigues ha scritto: > Hi guys of kde-core. > > Any new review of AtCore? =D I think that there were questions open on your side. Did you address the two issues, namely: > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 11:19 PM, Lays Rodrigues wrote: > -> aacid > > "Partially, i personally still think

  1   2   3   >