KF6 meeting notes 2022-06-07

https://invent.kde.org/teams/frameworks-devs/kf6-workboard/-/issues/7 https://invent.kde.org/plasma/kscreenlocker/-/blob/master/x11locker.cpp#L68 - proven to no longer be needed using "sleep 5; xev" and then locking the screen (xev must not steal the input focus or be shown on top of the locker)

KF6 meeting notes 2022-05-24

Agenda: https://invent.kde.org/teams/frameworks-devs/kf6-workboard/-/issues/6 Deprecation level bump to 5.94: - Use ecm_set_disabled_deprecation_versions() when fixing deprecation issues to prevent regressions before we bump the overall level on the CI, use the latest released version for this

KF6 meeting notes 2022-05-10

https://invent.kde.org/teams/frameworks-devs/kf6-workboard/-/issues/5 utility-macro in KPluginFactory that allows registering multiple plugins? - https://invent.kde.org/teams/frameworks-devs/kf6-workboard/-/issues/ 5#note_446289 - sounds useful, but challenge is variadic macros - macro variants

KF6 meeting notes 2022-04-26

(cc-ing Plasma as well, as it's actually mostly about that this time) https://invent.kde.org/teams/frameworks-devs/kf6-workboard/-/issues/4 Remaining QDesktopWidget uses: * KAccess: - this is an accessibility feature for showing the X11 bell visually, from a separate program - needs figuring

Re: KF6 meeting notes 2022-04-12

On Thursday, 14 April 2022 03:22:01 CEST Aleix Pol wrote: > Hi Volker, > Thanks a lot for the notes! It makes it easier to follow the work even > if I'm unable to join lately. > > One question, how does co-installability affect flatpak? If anything, > the environment is much more controlled so it

Re: KF6 meeting notes 2022-04-12

Hi Volker, Thanks a lot for the notes! It makes it easier to follow the work even if I'm unable to join lately. One question, how does co-installability affect flatpak? If anything, the environment is much more controlled so it shouldn't matter that much (?). Aleix On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 9:24

KF6 meeting notes 2022-04-12

https://invent.kde.org/teams/frameworks-devs/kf6-workboard/-/issues/3 https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kconfigwidgets/-/merge_requests/131 - needs review/feedback - interesting part is openColorScheme() in kcolorschemehelpers_p.h - existing benchmark in the tests shows no change - might not work

KF6 meeting notes 2022-03-08

Short meeting due to the Plasma 6 spring covering a lot already during the weekend. https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kwayland/-/merge_requests/52 - blocks kwayland-server/plasma-workspace - should we maybe as a first step just add the extra folder level and leave the upper/lower case split

KF6 meeting notes 2022-03-01

https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/syntax-highlighting/-/issues/18 - this is introduced by using lower-case namespace folder names, which we didn't do in frameworks so far - only issues a warning, doesn't break the build - possible solution would be to not use lower-case namespace folder names,

KF6 meeting notes 2022-02-22

Should we retire the QMake support for KF6? - plan is to drop after branching, unless somebody steps up to maintain this https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/plasma-framework/-/merge_requests/452 - needs feedback, the approach discussed two weeks ago wasn't entirely applicable due to QXcbWindow not

KF6 meeting notes 2022-02-08

https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kiconthemes/-/merge_requests/55 - reviewed https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kcoreaddons/-/merge_requests/192 - reviewed https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kio/-/merge_requests/693#note_394308 - would make the macro prefix inconsistent with the export macros

KF6 meeting notes 2022-02-01

Plasma 6 sprint - https://doodle.com/poll/nvdyzp979y8dvfyd https://invent.kde.org/plasma/drkonqi/-/merge_requests/51 - does Plasma want to use versioned or version-less targets? -> we use version-less targets outside of Frameworks https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kwayland/-/merge_requests/52 -

KF6 meeting notes 2022-01-25

https://phabricator.kde.org/T15127#269860 (build status): - limited progress, Kirigami is the main blocker now - should we ifdef out the blocking shader stuff to unblock dependent modules? -> yes https://phabricator.kde.org/T15232 (unit test status): - good progress, only 9 regressions compared

Re: KF6 meeting notes 2022-01-18

> anyone wants to approve that? :) Done On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 5:44 PM Volker Krause wrote: > > https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/extra-cmake-modules/-/merge_requests/223 > - so https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/extra-cmake-modules/-/merge_requests/ > 222 instead after all? > - anyone wants

KF6 meeting notes 2022-01-18

https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/extra-cmake-modules/-/merge_requests/223 - so https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/extra-cmake-modules/-/merge_requests/ 222 instead after all? - anyone wants to approve that? :) - once this is in, we need to review the state of unit tests for all frameworks again

KF6 meeting notes 2022-01-11

https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kio/-/merge_requests/700 - ship it, can be used everywhere https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kservice/-/merge_requests/79 - can we do this now in all frameworks, or wait one KF release for fallout? - can be done now for all frameworks

Re: Includes (was: Re: KF6 meeting notes 2022-01-04)

On Dienstag, 4. Januar 2022 19:41:45 CET Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > Am Dienstag, 4. Januar 2022, 18:07:45 CET schrieb Volker Krause: > > - in some places includes with the framework prefix don't seem to work > > anymore (ie. vs ), any idea where those extra > > include directories came

Re: KF6 meeting notes 2022-01-04

On 4/1/22 19:07, Volker Krause wrote: https://phabricator.kde.org/T15127 (Qt6 build status update): - 60+ modules build - Kate (without plugins) with Breeze style and platform file dialogs mostly working - Kirigami might not be doable without branching (Button.icon, QtGraphicalEffects) - CI

Includes (was: Re: KF6 meeting notes 2022-01-04)

Am Dienstag, 4. Januar 2022, 18:07:45 CET schrieb Volker Krause: > - in some places includes with the framework prefix don't seem to work > anymore (ie. vs ), any idea where those extra > include directories came from/got lost? FTR, pointed on irc to some insights about design of include folder

KF6 meeting notes 2022-01-04

https://phabricator.kde.org/T15127 (Qt6 build status update): - 60+ modules build - Kate (without plugins) with Breeze style and platform file dialogs mostly working - Kirigami might not be doable without branching (Button.icon, QtGraphicalEffects) - CI setup in progress - in some places

KF6 meeting notes 2021-12-28

https://phabricator.kde.org/T15127 - progressed to the point that we have a mostly working KWrite - there's still a few pending reviews - we need a proper solution for QTextCodec (Ahmad has a potential/partial solution for ktexteditor, MR upcoming) - Kirigami's custom items need work: Nico might

KF6 meeting notes

Due to only a few making it to the meeting, we didn't discuss any major tasks. An open question, are we going to have a meeting next week? What with Christmas and all? Regards, Ahmad Samir

KF6 meeting notes 2021-12-14

https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/ki18n/-/merge_requests/41#note_354970 - alternatives approaches to doing this (branching, local-only changes, doing nothing) are all considered worse, so agreement is to integrate these changes

Re : Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-12-07

Le mercredi 8 décembre 2021 à 11:26 AM, David Redondo a écrit : > Am Dienstag, 7. Dezember 2021, 18:04:19 CET schrieb Volker Krause: > > > https://phabricator.kde.org/T11587 > > > > - there are bigger plans to rework color scheming, this needs more > > coordination with the effort to

Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-12-07

Am Dienstag, 7. Dezember 2021, 18:04:19 CET schrieb Volker Krause: https://phabricator.kde.org/T11587 - there are bigger plans to rework color scheming, this needs more coordination with the effort to down-tier this for KF6 - would likely mean only storing the color scheme name in kdeglobals

KF6 meeting notes 2021-12-07

https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/2021-December/119935.html - tricky to find a mentor so far - good tasks become available after branching, but that might not happen in time https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kcoreaddons/-/merge_requests/157 - merged - apply the same approach to

KF6 meeting notes 2021-11-30

https://phabricator.kde.org/T11635 - very likely unused, but hard to verify - grep finds a few users though - deprecate, add a runtime deprecation warning https://phabricator.kde.org/T13134 - QNetworkInterface in 6.3 seems to cover all we need now https://phabricator.kde.org/T12122 - removing

KF6 meeting notes 2021-11-23

https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kcoreaddons/-/merge_requests/149 * needs input by Nico https://phabricator.kde.org/T13924 * unused private class inheritance infrastructure can be removed at any time without breaking ABI

KF6 meeting notes 2021-11-09

[Davids: please look for the items needing your input :)] https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/extra-cmake-modules/-/merge_requests/142 * what's the status of this? * important for enabling Qt6 builds, so would be good to get in * David F?

KF6 meeting notes 2021-11-09

https://phabricator.kde.org/T12101 * we want QKeyChain as the consumer API (port in progress) * there's a pending merge request to add secret service API to KWallet -> move to in progress https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/purpose/-/issues/1 * Purpose has a very generic API, but currently only

KF6 meeting notes 2021-11-02

https://phabricator.kde.org/T14744 * how to handle deprecation of methods that take a keyword as default parameter? Example: void registerPlugin(const QString , CreateInstanceWithMetaDataFunction instanceFunction) { registerPlugin(keyword, ::staticMetaObject, instanceFunction); } * Decision:

Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-10-26

On Dienstag, 26. Oktober 2021 22:09:02 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El dimarts, 26 d’octubre de 2021, a les 18:05:42 (CEST), Volker Krause va escriure: > > !! Meeting will move to 17:00 CET next week (due to DST change in > > continental Europe) > > > > Threaded KIO workers: > > * David F is

Aw: KF6 meeting notes 2021-10-26

.   See https://phabricator.kde.org/T12265 for the related task.   Regards Alex     Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Oktober 2021 um 18:05 Uhr Von: "Volker Krause" An: kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org Betreff: KF6 meeting notes 2021-10-26 !! Meeting will move to 17:00 CET next week (due to

Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-10-26

El dimarts, 26 d’octubre de 2021, a les 18:05:42 (CEST), Volker Krause va escriure: > !! Meeting will move to 17:00 CET next week (due to DST change in continental > Europe) > > Threaded KIO workers: > * David F is removing the POP3 kioslave to enable that This is not what kmail/akonadi use to

KF6 meeting notes 2021-10-26

!! Meeting will move to 17:00 CET next week (due to DST change in continental Europe) https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kcoreaddons/-/merge_requests/149 * static plugin support draft, needs review * MRs to demonstrate the usage exists for KWin and KMyMoney

Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-10-19

On mardi 19 octobre 2021 17:57:42 CEST Volker Krause wrote: > * https://phabricator.kde.org/T11632#264728 > Has been discussed several times already, agreement has been that QML > bindings go into the module they are for, where needed with an built-time > optional dependency on qtdeclarative. This

KF6 meeting notes 2021-10-19

* https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kservice/-/merge_requests/60#note_323530 Does it make sense to be specific about the deprecating the different constructors? * https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kcoreaddons/-/commits/work/ kcoreaddons_static_plugin Review/testing needed. *

KF6 meeting notes 2021-10-11

!! Changing the meeting time: - Monday conflicts with Alex's new university schedule and is difficult for David F, would Tuesday at the same time work for everyone instead? -> moved to Tuesday starting next week KF6 Timeline - Plasma needs to know for release planning for 2022 - possible

KF6 meeting notes 2021-10-04

!! More reviews needed: - https://invent.kde.org/dashboard/merge_requests? scope=all=opened_username=alex - https://invent.kde.org/dashboard/merge_requests? scope=all=opened_username=ahmadsamir KIO slave on hold feature: - not needed anymore for passing to another application, but still needed

KF6 meeting notes 2021-09-27

https://phabricator.kde.org/T12212 * search providers are used by apps, not just Plasma, so the move to Plasma seems wrong * David E doesn't remember creating the task, now considered a bad idea https://phabricator.kde.org/T12098 * not a kf6 blocker, could happen later

KF6 meeting notes 2021-09-21

Short meeting due to an acute David insufficiency, mainly discussion licensing issues. What to do about files without any license header at all? - ask everyone - for trivial files we can just add a CC0-1.0 license - can we assume the LICENSE file from a top-level folder applies as well? might

KF6 meeting notes 2021-09-13

Workboard clarification: - Needs Input is for tasks needing discussion in the weekly meeting - In Discussion was created during a sprint and should not be used outside of a sprint https://phabricator.kde.org/T12549 - do we need a KConfigXT extension for a setting/state separation? -> yes --

Aw: Re: Deprecation wrappers for pre-KF6 time (was: Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-06-05)

rs for pre-KF6 time (was: Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-06-05) Am Samstag, 5. Juni 2021, 22:39:15 CEST schrieb Alexander Lohnau: > Or could we use the BUILD_DEPRECATED_SINCE variant in this case? Like we > already have to do with virtual methods. > > This way one would still be able to

KF6 meeting notes 2021-08-30

* https://phabricator.kde.org/T14312 - plugin loading is using a struct for this, so we consider this lower priority for now. * should we have a "nice to have" column on the work board? * https://phabricator.kde.org/T14784 - seems never set/used, so can be removed. *

KF6 meeting notes 2021-08-02

* https://phabricator.kde.org/T13056: Technically not a KF task, and solved itself by moving away from KAboutData. * https://phabricator.kde.org/T14564: There are a number of good reasons to consistently use JSON files, desktop files for editing might be nicer, but those files are rarely

KF6 meeting notes 2021-07-26

Hi all,   here are the notes from the KF6 weekly.   Regards Alexander   https://phabricator.kde.org/T12176: If a usecase comes up one could think if implementing a cross-platform autostart API. In its current state & the current usages it should be deprecated. The needed logic should be

KF6 meeting notes 2021-07-19

Topics remaining from last week: * Raising the Qt minimum version to 5.15.2: https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/ kde-frameworks-devel/2021-July/118039.html * STL use in KF implementation: https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kio/-/ merge_requests/484 * Friedrich's alternative ECM branching proposal:

KF6 meeting notes 2021-07-12

Hi, apparently many people who voted for Monday 15:00 UTC as the new meeting time didn't get the memo yet that this is the new meeting time now ;-) So here's mainly topics that we weren't able to discuss and that we then need to cover next week (unless they resolve themselves on the mailing

Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-06-12

Hello, On Friday, 18 June 2021 22:36:34 CEST Volker Krause wrote: > On Freitag, 18. Juni 2021 22:27:40 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: > > On Friday, 18 June 2021 15:21:07 CEST Volker Krause wrote: > > > Added now, Monday 09:00 UTC. > > > > OK, I will show up only at 10 though. I can't do 9. > > oh,

Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-06-12

On Freitag, 18. Juni 2021 22:27:40 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Friday, 18 June 2021 15:21:07 CEST Volker Krause wrote: > > Added now, Monday 09:00 UTC. > > OK, I will show up only at 10 though. I can't do 9. oh, sorry, I did this from the top of my head ("Monday morning works for everyone"),

Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-06-12

On Friday, 18 June 2021 15:21:07 CEST Volker Krause wrote: > Added now, Monday 09:00 UTC. OK, I will show up only at 10 though. I can't do 9. Cheers. -- Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net enioka Haute Couture - proud patron of KDE, https://hc.enioka.com/en signature.asc Description: This

Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-06-12

On Freitag, 18. Juni 2021 15:01:00 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello, > > On Tuesday, 15 June 2021 18:17:27 CEST Volker Krause wrote: > > On Dienstag, 15. Juni 2021 12:45:21 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: > > > David Faure ha scritto: > > > > On dimanche 13 juin 2021 20:32:42 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote:

Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-06-12

Hello, On Tuesday, 15 June 2021 18:17:27 CEST Volker Krause wrote: > On Dienstag, 15. Juni 2021 12:45:21 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: > > David Faure ha scritto: > > > On dimanche 13 juin 2021 20:32:42 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: > > >> -> we need need input about dfaure presence and try to avoid

Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-06-12

El dimarts, 15 de juny de 2021, a les 18:17:27 (CEST), Volker Krause va escriure: > On Dienstag, 15. Juni 2021 12:45:21 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: > > David Faure ha scritto: > > > On dimanche 13 juin 2021 20:32:42 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: > > >> -> we need need input about dfaure presence and

Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-06-12

On Dienstag, 15. Juni 2021 12:45:21 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: > David Faure ha scritto: > > On dimanche 13 juin 2021 20:32:42 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: > >> -> we need need input about dfaure presence and try to avoid conflicts > >> with > >> Plasma BoFs > > > > I'm available Mon-Thu, but since

Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-06-12

Hello, On Tuesday, 15 June 2021 12:45:21 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: > David Faure ha scritto: > > On dimanche 13 juin 2021 20:32:42 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: > >> -> we need need input about dfaure presence and try to avoid conflicts > >> with > >> Plasma BoFs > > > > I'm available Mon-Thu, but

Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-06-12

David Faure ha scritto: > On dimanche 13 juin 2021 20:32:42 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: >> -> we need need input about dfaure presence and try to avoid conflicts with >> Plasma BoFs > > I'm available Mon-Thu, but since Tue-Wed is also Qt Contributor Summit, > maybe better plan for the KF6 BoF on

Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-06-12

On dimanche 13 juin 2021 20:32:42 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: > -> we need need input about dfaure presence and try to avoid conflicts with > Plasma BoFs I'm available Mon-Thu, but since Tue-Wed is also Qt Contributor Summit, maybe better plan for the KF6 BoF on Monday (outside the AGM time)? --

KF6 meeting notes 2021-06-12

Hi, the first point of discussion was of course related to the upcoming event: - We should schedule at least one KF6 BoF at Akademy! -> we need need input about dfaure presence and try to avoid conflicts with Plasma BoFs No much activity on the tasks as there were no enough people with the

Re: Deprecation wrappers for pre-KF6 time (was: Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-06-05)

Am Samstag, 5. Juni 2021, 22:39:15 CEST schrieb Alexander Lohnau: > Or could we use the BUILD_DEPRECATED_SINCE variant in this case? Like we > already have to do with virtual methods. > > This way one would still be able to test it when compiling the framework > without deprecations. Existing API

Re: Deprecation wrappers for pre-KF6 time (was: Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-06-05)

Or could we use the BUILD_DEPRECATED_SINCE variant in this case? Like we already have to do with virtual methods. This way one would still be able to test it when compiling the framework without deprecations. Existing API users will still be informed about the deprecations by the compiler

Deprecation wrappers for pre-KF6 time (was: Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-06-05)

Am Samstag, 5. Juni 2021, 16:29:10 CEST schrieb Volker Krause: > Deprecation wrappers macros: > - should those also be added for things that have no replacement yet, or > where the replacement will only become available for KF6? > - trader queries is one such example

KF6 meeting notes 2021-06-05

Hi all, here are the notes from today's KF6 weekly call: C++ 17 - can we use std::optional in public API? KPluginLoader has that need - we need to keep source compatibility with older KF5, so unconditional C++17 includes can be a problem during the remaining KF5 lifetime (but not for KF6) -

KF6 meeting notes 2021-05-29

Hi all, no "needs input" tasks have been discussed this time, the focus has been on several tasks all related somehow to KCMs and plugin loading. I think this was not really a problem. While there are still "needs input" tasks around, it is more and more likely to end up discussing other tasks

KF6 meeting notes 2021-05-22

Hi all, the discussion included questions not linked to any tasks, and tasks from both "needs input" (ok, just 2) and "backlog". I guess that, going forward, we will see more tasks from other columns being part of the discussion (the "needs input" column is shorter and shorter).

KF6 meeting notes 2021-05-15

Hi all, apologize again for the late report. Luckily most of (if not) all the affected tasks have been updated with more accurate summaries already. == pending ECM task Before going through the tasks in "needs input" state, we touched again a few ECM-related tasks already discussed in the

KF6 meeting notes 2021-05-08

Hi, Sorry, I forgot to send the notes. They may also be slightly less detailed than usual, but what matters is that the "needs input" columns is a bit shorter. - = https://phabricator.kde.org/T12536 "Rethink notification sounds" There are notes from the KF 6 sprint, but the task is still

KF6 meeting notes 2021-05-01

Hi all, as suggested it would be wise to send some reminders before the meeting. Also, it has been pointed out not everyone may attend on Saturday - but on the other hand it may be difficult to find another slot. Anyway, here are the notes: --- - https://phabricator.kde.org/T12542 "Fix

Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-04-24

Yep, see you all in less than half an hour. I'll be in today. David. On vendredi 30 avril 2021 21:54:41 CEST Dominik Haumann wrote: > Hi Luigi, > > with respect to the reminder of the weekly meetings: It might make > sense to send such a reminder *before* these meetings and not after > > :-) >

Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-04-24

Hi Luigi, with respect to the reminder of the weekly meetings: It might make sense to send such a reminder *before* these meetings and not after :-) Besides that, thanks for sending these minutes to keep us all informed. Best regards Dominik On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 4:19 PM Luigi Toscano

KF6 meeting notes 2021-04-24

Hi all, we had more Plasma people around today, so the work focused on Plasma notes (some of which turned out to not be really KF6.0 blockers). Before going into the notes, I'd like to remind everyone that the meeting happens every Saturday at 15.00 CEST (currently 13.00 GMT) and it uses the same

Re: Moving plasma-frameworks & krunner to Plasma release set for *6? (was: Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-04-17)

On sabato 17 aprile 2021 16:38:32 CEST Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > It seems these days the only real user of plasma-frameworks & krunner > libraries is the Plasma shell itself, with other applications only providing > plugins/extensions and only targeting Plasma again. IIRC Amarok was the >

Re: Moving plasma-frameworks & krunner to Plasma release set for *6? (was: Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-04-17)

> It seems these days the only real user of plasma-frameworks & krunner > libraries is the Plasma shell itself, with other applications only providing > plugins/extensions and only targeting Plasma again. That is mostly in line with other discussions in plasma. There is a ticket splitting

Moving plasma-frameworks & krunner to Plasma release set for *6? (was: Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-04-17)

(cc: plasma-devel for heads-up, not subscribed there, please re: only to kfd) Am Samstag, 17. April 2021, 16:11:24 CEST schrieb Luigi Toscano: > Several "needs input" tasks are related to Plasma. > Maybe it would be better to focus on Plasma next time and involve Plasma > people, and find out

KF6 meeting notes 2021-04-17

Hi all, the meeting started without a fixed agenda but nevertheless the "needs input" list is much shorter now, thanks everyone! Please see the notes below, especially Plasma people :) and feel free to comment if I've missed anything. Question about the removal of support

Saturday, 2021-04-11 KF6 meeting notes

Hello, we held the second ever KF6 weekly meeting yesterday, and here are the meeting notes, taken by Luigi Toscano (lightly proof-read by myself). Investigate replacing KSelectAction with QActionGroup ( ) Moved back to backlog, because it (most likely)