On Sunday 29 September 2013 22:31:38 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Sunday, September 29, 2013 20:50:28 David Faure wrote:
This is clearly because kbookmarks was written as part of kio, and with
konqueror in mind. I guess the question is how generic we want KBookmarks
to be, i.e. should it
On Sept. 23, 2013, 12:07 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
Tested the patch in my tree, works for caps lock too.
Now it highlights a dependency problem... We don't want a dependency on
QX11Extras from KGuiAddons. So maybe we should move KModifierKeyInfo to
your proposed KX11Extras?
Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Diumenge, 29 de setembre de 2013, a les 12:14:49, David Faure va escriure:
On Monday 23 September 2013 20:23:13 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
So we don't have a man page anymore? Debian will be happy :D
Also we're losing the i18n-zation side of the man page, which the
On Sunday, September 29, 2013 23:49:15 Mark wrote:
If i'm not mistaken, Dolphin is also using KBookmarks. Would your suggestion
keep it alive for dolphin? Or would that mean creating a plugin that can
read/write bookmarks to any file?
It would work just like it is now.
--
sebas
See http://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs_stable/846/
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
On Monday, September 30, 2013 09:03:36 David Faure wrote:
On Sunday 29 September 2013 22:31:38 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
[...]
I imagine KBookmark being a more service-like thing, rather than a
mechanism to store and read bookmarks.
What you say makes sense, it sure sounds like a future
kpart (tier3) depends on KIO and KService, both of which are still in staging
standalone build of kpart then fails because of reference to
kprotocolmanager.h, from kio, which has local includes
include global.h // KIO::CacheControl
#include kio/kiocore_export.h
#include kprotocolinfo.h
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112984/#review41018
---
staging/kemoticons/src/core/kemoticonsprovider.h
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112935/#review41019
---
Ping
- Martin Klapetek
On Sept. 25, 2013, 4:50 p.m., Martin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112964/#review41020
---
Ping
- Martin Klapetek
On Sept. 27, 2013, 9:15 a.m., Martin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112942/#review41021
---
ping?
- Aleix Pol Gonzalez
On Sept. 25, 2013, 5:35 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112901/#review41023
---
ping?
- Aleix Pol Gonzalez
On Sept. 24, 2013, 1:32 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112935/#review41026
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- John Layt
On Sept. 25, 2013, 4:50
On Sept. 30, 2013, 11:23 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
ping?
As before, i'm ok with it, but am not going to give another ship it :) That
really is up to someone with in deep knowledge about kde4support to see if it
makes sense where you placed it.
- Mark
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112964/#review41027
---
staging/kprintutils/CMakeLists.txt
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112964/#review41036
---
Ship it!
Oh btw, it looks good to me and looks like an
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112935/#review41038
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112935/
---
(Updated Sept. 30, 2013, 2:16 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
See http://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs_frameworks_qt5/1299/changes
Changes:
[mklapetek] Remove unused image assets
[mklapetek] Move KDEPrintSupport into KPrintUtils
[mklapetek] Port from KLineEdit and KComboBox to their Qt variants
--
[...truncated 18100
On Sept. 30, 2013, 2:01 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
staging/kprintutils/CMakeLists.txt, line 30
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112964/diff/1/?file=192865#file192865line30
Why are you removing these?
They have no effect on the code as the code compiles without them, so they
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112964/
---
(Updated Sept. 30, 2013, 2:23 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112964/#review41043
---
This review has been submitted with commit
See http://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs_frameworks_qt5/1301/changes
Changes:
[mklapetek] Remove unused includes; should fix the build
--
[...truncated 17985 lines...]
[ 73%] Building CXX object
Hello people
The current KFileMetaDataWidget uses the Nepomuk libraries which no longer
exist in kdelibs. So when we finally start splitting the libraries into their
own git repos, kde4support will detect that Nepomuk is not installed and that
will make KFileMetaDataWidget useless - It
Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
Maybe we can use a third-party docbook-to-manpage conversion tool. On
Linux it would be easy to install, and on Windows it wouldn't be needed
(what's a manpage?). And still leave it optional everywhere...
Well if this is okay, you could just remove the KDE-specific DTDs
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in wrote:
I'm planning on removing KFileMetaDataWidget completely, and marking it as
deprecated in kdelibs4. Applications which still use it (Konversation and
KGet) can start using Nepomuk::FileMetaDataWidget which offers the same api.
26 matches
Mail list logo
