---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115440/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Luigi Toscano.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115442/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kwindowsystem
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115442/#review48791
---
src/netwm.h
Any new module that should be added to this release, compared to TP1?
Should I include attica?
Any version number that should be upgraded in the modules themselves? I
realize now that it's all called 5.0.0 everywhere already. The packages are
properly numbered, but not the cmake variable
On Monday 03 February 2014 10:17:49 David Faure wrote:
Any new module that should be added to this release, compared to TP1?
Should I include attica?
Since this question keeps popping up, let's integrate it. It should also be
added to the list: http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/List
Also,
On Jan. 31, 2014, 8:15 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
There was an optional jsonfile argument; I guess you checked nothing was
using it? Because anything that was will be broken by this.
That said, I have no objection to breaking source compatibility of
something that hasn't even been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115421/#review48815
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Aleix Pol Gonzalez
On Feb. 1, 2014,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115421/
---
(Updated Feb. 3, 2014, 12:26 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115421/#review48817
---
This review has been submitted with commit
On Feb. 3, 2014, 9:36 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
src/netwm.h, lines 1426-1430
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115442/diff/1/?file=241482#file241482line1426
This method should also get adjusted but as it's virtual it will be a
true API break.
What's the best way?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115336/
---
(Updated Feb. 3, 2014, 12:29 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115336/#review48819
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115434/#review48820
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Aurélien Gâteau
On Feb. 2, 2014,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115430/#review48821
---
autotests/readtest.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115418/#review48822
---
Ship it!
There is a small conflict with KCompletionPrivate
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115430/
---
(Updated Feb. 3, 2014, 1:12 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115430/#review48829
---
Ship it!
Can't really test it locally since I can't find a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115440/#review48830
---
Ship it!
If it is worth to move it to another, more generic
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115430/
---
(Updated Feb. 3, 2014, 3:03 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
See http://build.kde.org/job/kimageformats_master_qt5/18/changes
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115395/#review48846
---
Please see the big comment below the elseif line, the link to
On Feb. 3, 2014, 6:07 p.m., Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
Please see the big comment below the elseif line, the link to the
kde-core-devel and
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-develm=138244424421211w=2: the issue
here is that if you pass -fno-exceptions to clang you need to guarantee
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115345/
---
(Updated Feb. 3, 2014, 6:24 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115345/#review48848
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115345/#review48849
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115345/
---
(Updated Feb. 3, 2014, 6:24 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
See http://build.kde.org/job/kimageformats_master_qt5/21/changes
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115203/
---
(Updated Feb. 3, 2014, 7:43 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115450/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kwindowsystem
On Feb. 3, 2014, 7:07 p.m., Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
Please see the big comment below the elseif line, the link to the
kde-core-devel and
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-develm=138244424421211w=2: the issue
here is that if you pass -fno-exceptions to clang you need to guarantee
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115344/#review48852
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115344/
---
(Updated Feb. 3, 2014, 7:46 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115450/#review48854
---
src/kstartupinfo.cpp
On Feb. 3, 2014, 9:07 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
src/kstartupinfo.cpp, lines 1250-1254
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115450/diff/1/?file=241654#file241654line1250
why is this introduced again?
NET::OnAllDesktops does not exist if KWINDOWSYSTEM_HAVE_X11 is false. I don't
know
On Feb. 3, 2014, 9:07 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
src/kstartupinfo.cpp, lines 1250-1254
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115450/diff/1/?file=241654#file241654line1250
why is this introduced again?
Alexander Richardson wrote:
NET::OnAllDesktops does not exist if
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115450/
---
(Updated Feb. 3, 2014, 9:24 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Feb. 3, 2014, 9:07 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
src/kstartupinfo.cpp, lines 1250-1254
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115450/diff/1/?file=241654#file241654line1250
why is this introduced again?
Alexander Richardson wrote:
NET::OnAllDesktops does not exist if
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115203/#review48872
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115203/
---
(Updated Feb. 3, 2014, 10:25 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Feb. 3, 2014, 8:07 p.m., Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
Please see the big comment below the elseif line, the link to the
kde-core-devel and
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-develm=138244424421211w=2: the issue
here is that if you pass -fno-exceptions to clang you need to guarantee
On Jan. 31, 2014, 7:41 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
src/solid/networking_win.cpp, lines 116-117
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115343/diff/1/?file=240767#file240767line116
It's odd that this should be needed. Do you have any way of getting
verbose output?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115456/
---
Review request for Build System, Extra Cmake Modules, KDE Frameworks, and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115343/
---
(Updated Feb. 4, 2014, 1:04 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115457/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and kdewin.
Repository: kjs
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115418/
---
(Updated Feb. 4, 2014, 12:30 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115418/#review48879
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115419/
---
(Updated Feb. 4, 2014, 12:36 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115378/#review48880
---
kde-modules/KDECompilerSettings.cmake
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115458/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Alexander Richardson.
Repository:
On Feb. 3, 2014, 9:07 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
src/kstartupinfo.cpp, lines 1250-1254
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115450/diff/1/?file=241654#file241654line1250
why is this introduced again?
Alexander Richardson wrote:
NET::OnAllDesktops does not exist if
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115434/#review48885
---
This review has been submitted with commit
On Feb. 3, 2014, 9:36 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
src/netwm.h, lines 1426-1430
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115442/diff/1/?file=241482#file241482line1426
This method should also get adjusted but as it's virtual it will be a
true API break.
What's the best way?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115442/
---
(Updated Feb. 4, 2014, 7:52 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
53 matches
Mail list logo