On Monday 03 February 2014 10:17:49 David Faure wrote: > Any new module that should be added to this release, compared to TP1? > > Should I include attica?
Since this question keeps popping up, let's integrate it. It should also be added to the list: http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/List Also, since no one stepped up to say if it should be in or out, I'd say it should be with no declared maintainer until someone claims it. > Any version number that should be upgraded in the modules themselves? I > realize now that it's all called 5.0.0 everywhere already. The packages are > properly numbered, but not the cmake variable containing the version or the > *version.h files, which all say 5.0.0 already. > > Option 1 -> it's too late, due to the tech preview saying 5.0.0 already. > Option 1 bis -> this was intended from the start, no point in apps doing > version checking on pre-release versions of kf5 > > Option 2 -> tech previews don't count, let's "downgrade" to 4.96.0 > everywhere. I would prefer option 2. The whole point of the several releases to come is also to test our process for releases which include having proper version number everywhere. Cheers. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
