On Wednesday, 2014-09-10, 23:43:15, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimarts, 9 de setembre de 2014, a les 16:25:26, Kevin Krammer va
escriure:
On Sunday, 2014-09-07, 10:27:06, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
So as I see it, there's three options:
* Do nothing, and expect that people have to set
On Set. 10, 2014, 11:31 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
I guess this is about frameworks branch. If yes, please ignore it, as it
has been split into the several framework repositories; check if the issue
applies in the separate KIconThemes framework.
Stefan Brüns wrote:
patch applies
El Dijous, 11 de setembre de 2014, a les 08:46:11, Kevin Krammer va escriure:
On Wednesday, 2014-09-10, 23:43:15, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimarts, 9 de setembre de 2014, a les 16:25:26, Kevin Krammer va
escriure:
On Sunday, 2014-09-07, 10:27:06, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
So as I
El Dimecres, 10 de setembre de 2014, a les 08:40:13, Treeve Jelbert va
escriure:
On Wednesday 10 September 2014 00:10:22 Marko Käning wrote:
I actually encountered these on linux.
I have some local patches, which are attached, which fix the problem for me.
I do do not have commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120118/#review66210
---
Ship it!
Looks good to me!
- Albert Astals Cid
On set.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120138/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kio
Description
---
On Thursday, 2014-09-11, 09:33:23, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dijous, 11 de setembre de 2014, a les 08:46:11, Kevin Krammer va
escriure:
The rule to always also install an application icon into Hicolor was meant
as an example of a general intent that Hicolor be fully usable.
I don't
See http://build.kde.org/job/kde-baseapps_frameworks_qt5/108/changes
Changes:
[frank78ac] Make it possible to open archives via the command line
--
Started by remote host 2a01:4f8:160:9363::9 with note: Triggered by commit
Building remotely on LinuxSlave
El Dijous, 11 de setembre de 2014, a les 10:57:17, Kevin Krammer va escriure:
On Thursday, 2014-09-11, 09:33:23, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dijous, 11 de setembre de 2014, a les 08:46:11, Kevin Krammer va
escriure:
The rule to always also install an application icon into Hicolor was
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120118/
---
(Updated Sept. 11, 2014, 9:05 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Thursday, 2014-09-11, 02:06:02, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dijous, 11 de setembre de 2014, a les 10:57:17, Kevin Krammer va
escriure:
On Thursday, 2014-09-11, 09:33:23, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dijous, 11 de setembre de 2014, a les 08:46:11, Kevin Krammer va
escriure:
The
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120139/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks, Andreas Hartmetz and Stephen Kelly.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119274/
---
(Updated Sept. 11, 2014, 11:45 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Aug. 31, 2014, 6:57 a.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
Thanks for taking a look at this. It appears KConfigBase isn't available
on api.kde.org as it isn't documented, as kapidox hides such classes by
default. As KConfigBase is used outside of KConfig, I'd prefer if
KConfigBase gained a
See http://build.kde.org/job/kde-baseapps_frameworks_qt5/109/changes
Changes:
[emmanuelpescosta099] fixed TODO:
--
Started by remote host 2a01:4f8:160:9363::9 with note: Triggered by commit
Building remotely on LinuxSlave - 4 (PACKAGER LINBUILDER) in
On 11.09.2014 11:11, Kevin Krammer wrote:
From my point of view there is little use case of having a fallback if it does
not allow one to fall back to it.
Check out the chat log for the idea of enhancing the spec to
add some sort of system-level configuration scheme to set a
fallback one
On Thursday, 2014-09-11, 15:29:13, Eike Hein wrote:
On 11.09.2014 11:11, Kevin Krammer wrote:
From my point of view there is little use case of having a fallback if it
does
not allow one to fall back to it.
Check out the chat log for the idea of enhancing the spec to
add some sort of
On 11.09.2014 15:33, Kevin Krammer wrote:
Sounds interesting, but checkout where?
In this thread, where I've posted it and encouraged reading
it a few times :).
Cheers,
Kevin
Cheers,
Eike
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
On Thursday, 2014-09-11, 15:40:14, Eike Hein wrote:
On 11.09.2014 15:33, Kevin Krammer wrote:
Sounds interesting, but checkout where?
In this thread, where I've posted it and encouraged reading
it a few times :).
Ah :)
I thought you were referring to some XDG discussion.
Having a
On 11.09.2014 15:43, Kevin Krammer wrote:
Having a configurable fallback before the final fallback can't hurt, but that
doesn't solve the actual problem of hicolor being incomplete.
It is just a work around.
Sort of, except I think the outcome is more or less the
same - either a distro/ISV
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120132/
---
(Updated Sept. 11, 2014, 2:03 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Sept. 10, 2014, 9:31 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
I guess this is about frameworks branch. If yes, please ignore it, as it
has been split into the several framework repositories; check if the issue
applies in the separate KIconThemes framework.
Stefan Brüns wrote:
patch applies
On Thursday, 2014-09-11, 15:53:57, Eike Hein wrote:
On 11.09.2014 15:43, Kevin Krammer wrote:
Having a configurable fallback before the final fallback can't hurt, but
that doesn't solve the actual problem of hicolor being incomplete.
It is just a work around.
Sort of, except I think the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120142/#review66270
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Christoph Feck
On Sept. 11, 2014,
On 11.09.2014 16:09, Kevin Krammer wrote:
Why would hicolor be distro/ISV specific?
Because a hicolor theme everyone likes visually isn't going
to happen. People will want to modify what's in that fall-
back for theming reasons, and distros theme to differentiate
themselves.
In the hicolor
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120144/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and David Faure.
Repository: kio
On Thursday, 2014-09-11, 17:05:43, Eike Hein wrote:
On 11.09.2014 16:09, Kevin Krammer wrote:
Why would hicolor be distro/ISV specific?
Because a hicolor theme everyone likes visually isn't going
to happen. People will want to modify what's in that fall-
back for theming reasons, and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119867/#review66277
---
ping ?
- Hugo Pereira Da Costa
On Aug. 22, 2014, 11:27
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119867/#review66279
---
Ship it!
Looks good to me.
- Aleix Pol Gonzalez
On Aug.
On 11.09.2014 17:22, Kevin Krammer wrote:
Hicolor is there for cases where the setup fails to provide any workspace or
distribution specific theme.
Yes. So I'm thinking ahead and telling you how that setup looks
like for a workspace:
- Write a Qt platform plugin. Needs coding chops. We have
On 11.09.2014 17:22, Kevin Krammer wrote:
Or do you mean install the custom theme twice, once as itself and once as
hicolor?
Wait - I think I now understand why we're having trouble
communicating about this.
You think a distro has the option to install Oxygen *as*
hicolor, right, making my
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120147/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Christoph Cullmann.
Bugs: 158379
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120131/
---
(Updated Sept. 11, 2014, 4:11 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Wednesday 10 September 2014 21:13:10 Marko Käning wrote:
Hi David,
considering the upcoming 5.2.0 release I just wanted to inform you,
that there are currently no issues with any framework on OSX/CI. :)
Thanks Marko, that's a very important item to add to the release notes:
now works on
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119867/
---
(Updated Sept. 11, 2014, 5:29 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
Hi David,
On 11 Sep 2014, at 18:55 , David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Wednesday 10 September 2014 21:13:10 Marko Käning wrote:
considering the upcoming 5.2.0 release I just wanted to inform you,
that there are currently no issues with any framework on OSX/CI. :)
Thanks Marko, that's a very
On 09/10/2014 02:05 AM, David Faure wrote:
On Tuesday 09 September 2014 08:21:02 Carl Symons wrote:
On 09/09/2014 06:57 AM, David Faure wrote:
I just tagged and packed 5.2.0.
I extracted the following changelog items from git commits. But I don't
really understand the plasma-framework and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120147/#review66286
---
Ship it!
The patch looks good. Please commit. If we find
See http://build.kde.org/job/ktexteditor_master_qt5/641/changes
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Hi,
quite a few times I was hit by the fact that the list_dependencies tool
returns something seemingly valid, even if the project specified doesn’t
exist like here:
---
$ ./list_dependencies kdesupport/prison
kdesupport/extra-cmake-modules
Qt5[stable]
kdesupport/prison
$ ./list_dependencies
On Thursday 11 September 2014 20:50:15 Marko Käning wrote:
Hi David,
On 11 Sep 2014, at 18:55 , David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Wednesday 10 September 2014 21:13:10 Marko Käning wrote:
considering the upcoming 5.2.0 release I just wanted to inform you,
that there are currently no
On Thursday 11 September 2014 12:10:39 Carl Symons wrote:
Your response made me think of this in more depth. I think that your
take on it is correct. The announcements about the frequent releases
should be tailored to developers.
Jos has been pushing promotion of Frameworks 5 and the
Hi David,
On 11 Sep 2014, at 22:39 , David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
OK, so for the release notes,
now builds on OSX :-)
please, skip the “now” since it is building fine for frameworks already since
KF 5.0.0 [1].
:-)
Greets,
Marko
[1] https://projects.kde.org/news/271
P.S.: I’ll try
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:00:15PM +0200, David Faure wrote:
E.g. can someone write info/kde-frameworks-5.2.0.php
based on the input I gave, or shall I do my own thing there as fallback
(won't
be as good but better than nothing) ?
There's no changing content here, should be just a copy and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120138/#review66289
---
autotests/kurifiltertest.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120147/
---
(Updated Sept. 11, 2014, 9:24 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks
On Sept. 11, 2014, 7:39 p.m., Dominik Haumann wrote:
src/view/kateview.cpp, line 373
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120147/diff/1/?file=311597#file311597line373
this should be right spacer, right? :-)
All fixed. Will push. Thanks for the review. Don't hesitate to ping me in case
See http://build.kde.org/job/ktexteditor_master_qt5/646/
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
See http://build.kde.org/job/ktexteditor_master_qt5/648/changes
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120147/#review66298
---
Why is the component responsible for defining how it's going
Git commit f900be278e4e90d4df64b8393114dbbceebc2a53 by David Faure.
Committed on 11/09/2014 at 23:53.
Pushed by dfaure into branch 'master'.
Remove cmake-git, by popular demand.
Most people no longer need to build their own cmake, most distros ship a recent
enough one.
If you still want your
On Wednesday 20 August 2014 11:38:12 Jonathan Riddell wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:28:30PM +0200, Aleix Pol wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 9:49 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 01 July 2014 22:25:15 Jonathan Riddell wrote:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 11:25:11PM
On Thursday 11 September 2014 22:13:49 Jonathan Riddell wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:00:15PM +0200, David Faure wrote:
E.g. can someone write info/kde-frameworks-5.2.0.php
based on the input I gave, or shall I do my own thing there as fallback
(won't be as good but better than nothing)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120144/#review66307
---
Ship it!
Makes a lot of sense. I guess identical files was
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120144/
---
(Updated Sept. 12, 2014, 1:07 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Sept. 8, 2014, 6:22 p.m., Ben Cooksley wrote:
What is the status of this? Is there anything blocking it being shipped and
made available on api.kde.org?
Denis Steckelmacher wrote:
It works locally, so I'm just waiting for a ship-it or other comments :-)
Aleix Pol Gonzalez
On Aug. 31, 2014, 12:57 a.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
Thanks for taking a look at this. It appears KConfigBase isn't available
on api.kde.org as it isn't documented, as kapidox hides such classes by
default. As KConfigBase is used outside of KConfig, I'd prefer if
KConfigBase gained
On Sept. 8, 2014, 10:22 p.m., Ben Cooksley wrote:
What is the status of this? Is there anything blocking it being shipped and
made available on api.kde.org?
Denis Steckelmacher wrote:
It works locally, so I'm just waiting for a ship-it or other comments :-)
Aleix Pol Gonzalez
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119991/#review66315
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Matthew Dawson
On Aug. 29, 2014,
On Sept. 8, 2014, 6:22 p.m., Ben Cooksley wrote:
What is the status of this? Is there anything blocking it being shipped and
made available on api.kde.org?
Denis Steckelmacher wrote:
It works locally, so I'm just waiting for a ship-it or other comments :-)
Aleix Pol Gonzalez
On Sept. 8, 2014, 10:22 p.m., Ben Cooksley wrote:
What is the status of this? Is there anything blocking it being shipped and
made available on api.kde.org?
Denis Steckelmacher wrote:
It works locally, so I'm just waiting for a ship-it or other comments :-)
Aleix Pol Gonzalez
On Sept. 11, 2014, 10:19 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
Why is the component responsible for defining how it's going to be visually
integrated with the host application?
Do we get to hit the scrollbar if the component doesn't have a margin and
it's by the screen's border?
Why is
62 matches
Mail list logo
