Re: KDE Frameworks & Plasma 5.8 LTS

On Sunday 23 of October 2016 22:50:13 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El diumenge, 23 d’octubre de 2016, a les 14:03:28 CEST, Luca Beltrame va > > escriure: > > Il giorno Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:14:51 +0200 > > > > Dominik Haumann ha scritto: > > > Do we have any knowledge on whether

Re: lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libKF5FileMetaData.so | lib/libKF5FileMetaData.3.dylib

On Thursday 17 of December 2015 12:51:42 René J. V. Bertin wrote: > šumski wrote: > >> Yes, bug fixes can do that ;) > > > > Yes, but frameworks are under BC guarantee. > > So how are bugs supposed to be fixed if they break ABI compatibility? Certainly not by

Re: lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libKF5FileMetaData.so | lib/libKF5FileMetaData.3.dylib

On Wednesday 16 of December 2015 09:08:03 David Faure wrote: > Fixed, it was an oversight when converting the lib into a KF5 framework. But this is a BiC change... Cheers, Hrvoje ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org

Re: KDE Frameworks 5.8

On Saturday 07 of March 2015 17:24:17 David Faure wrote: Dear packagers, Here's KF 5.8.0 New frameworks: kpeople and kxmlrpcclient. A few things regarding kpeople: It requires Qt 5.3, rest of KF5 5.2; it uses strange version 0.5.0, rest of KF5 uses the same version as release; it uses

Re: backwards compatibility how namespacing might help or not

On Monday 26 of January 2015 17:22:49 Harald Sitter wrote: ahoy ahoy so... kf5.7 will contain kglobalacceld5 plasma5.2 will also contain kglobalacceld5 if it was built with kf5.6 this poses a binary conflict which makes kf5.7 not a simple drop-in replacement for kf5.6 without recompiling

Re: Move of kglobalacceld from plasma-workspace to kglobalaccel framework

On Thursday 18 of December 2014 20:15:52 Martin Klapetek wrote: On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 9:11 PM, šumski hrvoje.sen...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, i've checked your clone, and what new requirements will that bring, and if the CMakeLists there are accurate, that will create a problem. We

Re: Move of kglobalacceld from plasma-workspace to kglobalaccel framework

On Monday 15 of December 2014 13:55:04 Martin Gräßlin wrote: On Friday 12 December 2014 12:38:20 Martin Klapetek wrote: On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Alex Merry alex.me...@kde.org wrote: On 2014-09-17 10:47, Martin Gräßlin wrote: Hi all, I just prepared moving kglobalacceld from

Re: Move of kglobalacceld from plasma-workspace to kglobalaccel framework

On Wednesday 17 of December 2014 21:11:04 šumski wrote: On Monday 15 of December 2014 13:55:04 Martin Gräßlin wrote: On Friday 12 December 2014 12:38:20 Martin Klapetek wrote: On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Alex Merry alex.me...@kde.org wrote: On 2014-09-17 10:47, Martin Gräßlin wrote

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: kdelibs4support_master_qt5 #288

On Tuesday 21 of October 2014 20:33:41 šumski wrote: On Tuesday 21 of October 2014 19:58:55 KDE CI System wrote: See http://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs4support_master_qt5/288/changes In file included from http://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs4support_master_qt5/ws/src/kssl/kssl.cpp

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: kdelibs4support_master_qt5 #288

On Tuesday 21 of October 2014 19:58:55 KDE CI System wrote: See http://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs4support_master_qt5/288/changes In file included from http://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs4support_master_qt5/ws/src/kssl/kssl.cpp :21:0:

Re: KAuth and KF5

On Monday 30 of June 2014 17:31:39 Thiago Macieira wrote: Em seg 30 jun 2014, às 14:14:10, Milian Wolff escreveu: On Monday 30 June 2014 00:05:10 šumski wrote: On Thursday 26 of June 2014 12:14:49 Milian Wolff wrote: Hey, did you run it through valgrind? Here's what

Re: KAuth and KF5

/libc-2.19.so) ==30114==by 0x5C62FC4: exit (in /lib64/libc-2.19.so) ==30114==by 0x5C4CB0B: (below main) (in /lib64/libc-2.19.so) On Wednesday 25 June 2014 23:17:29 Luca Beltrame wrote: šumski wrote: http://paste.opensuse.org/view/raw/45956382 In case the pastebin link expires

Re: KAuth and KF5

On Wednesday 25 of June 2014 11:40:35 Milian Wolff wrote: On Tuesday 24 June 2014 23:44:12 Luca Beltrame wrote: Hello, currently, the KF5 version of KAuth is not quite usable as any helper used by KAuth segfaults: the most notable is backlighthelper, which always crashes at login.

Re: Plasma 5 Beta 2 tars

On Thursday 12 of June 2014 14:53:57 Marco Martin wrote: On Wednesday 11 June 2014, šumski wrote: Unfortunately, we cannot touch the buildhost, only sources which are built (and i'm running x86_64 OS). You might be right about kde_file, though seems to be a namespace clash/mixup

Re: Plasma 5 Beta 2 tars

On Wednesday 11 of June 2014 17:07:04 Sebastian Kügler wrote: [CC:ing frameworks-devel, hoping for additional input] On Friday, June 06, 2014 23:24:50 šumski wrote: On Friday 06 of June 2014 21:32:48 Eric Hameleers wrote: On Fri, 6 Jun 2014, ?umski wrote: On Thursday 05 of June 2014

Re: Update your copy of extra-cmake-modules

On Friday 18 of April 2014 10:37:50 Aurélien Gâteau wrote: ... I made it that way intentionally because I consider it bad to have different code generated depending on whether you have the framework is built from a release tarball or from git. I understand this means more build dependencies

Re: Update your copy of extra-cmake-modules

On Wednesday 16 of April 2014 07:36:57 Aurélien Gâteau wrote: Hi, I just pushed some changes to frameworks using Qt for translations which requires a recent version of extra-cmake-modules (you need to have 071581a3f899c881c9938efd082fd32589822b45). If you get build failures complaining

Re: KItemModels, Solid KJS licenses

On Wednesday 19 of February 2014 21:18:31 šumski wrote: Hi all, i've started pushing Frameworks to openSUSE Factory (i.e. next openSUSE release), and our legal review found some issues[1][2][3] with mentioned frameworks licenses. ... Last items =) KRunner and KActivities are missing

Re: KItemModels, Solid KJS licenses

On Monday 07 of April 2014 22:30:43 Albert Astals Cid wrote: El Dilluns, 7 d'abril de 2014, a les 22:24:44, šumski va escriure: On Wednesday 19 of February 2014 21:18:31 šumski wrote: Hi all, i've started pushing Frameworks to openSUSE Factory (i.e. next openSUSE release), and our

Re: KItemModels, Solid KJS licenses

On Wednesday 19 of February 2014 21:18:31 šumski wrote: Hi all, i've started pushing Frameworks to openSUSE Factory (i.e. next openSUSE release), and our legal review found some issues[1][2][3] with mentioned frameworks licenses. ... Next one, kinit[1]: src/kdeinit/proctitle.cpp and src

Re: KItemModels, Solid KJS licenses

On Wednesday 19 of February 2014 21:18:31 šumski wrote: Hi all, i've started pushing Frameworks to openSUSE Factory (i.e. next openSUSE release), and our legal review found some issues[1][2][3] with mentioned frameworks licenses. Ok, after next batch, issue came up with kwallet[1

Re: KItemModels, Solid KJS licenses

On Monday 03 of March 2014 16:20:20 George Staikos wrote: What license are you asking for? Sorry I haven't read the back info and don't feel like digging. :) Quote: kwallet-framework-4.96.0/src/runtime/kwalletd/kbetterthankdialog.(cpp|h) and

Re: KItemModels, Solid KJS licenses

On Thursday 20 of February 2014 11:41:48 Alex Merry wrote: CC'd people: please can you confirm that you would be happy to have the files listed below relicensed from GPL to LGPLv2+? Small ping :) It would be awesome if we could get this sorted for alpha2 Cheers, Hrvoje

Re: setting SOVERSION to 5

On Tuesday 25 of February 2014 18:45:15 Kevin Ottens wrote: On Tuesday 25 February 2014 17:12:37 Jonathan Riddell wrote: On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 04:55:43PM +0100, Kevin Ottens wrote: OK, but then the said change is either in the packaging or in our own cmake files as we'd have to drop

Re: KItemModels, Solid KJS licenses

On Saturday 22 of February 2014 17:39:33 Alex Merry wrote: On 20/02/14 16:00, šumski wrote: KItemModels are even more GPL, than LGPLv2+, 'only' main.cpp, lessthanwidget.(cpp|h), mainwindow.(cpp|h), selectionpmwidget.(cpp|h), descendantpmwidget.(cpp|h), recursivefilterpmwidget.(cpp|h

Re: KItemModels, Solid KJS licenses

On Thursday 20 of February 2014 11:41:48 Alex Merry wrote: ... KItemModels kcheckableproxymodel.(cpp|h) is Stephen Kelly (and, for safety, David Faure). modeltest.(cpp|h) were taken from Qt Concurrent, and subsequently modified by Stephen Kelly, and touched by David Faure and Aurélien

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: kde4support_master_qt5 #32

On Friday 24 of January 2014 09:53:00 Ben Cooksley wrote: There has been no changes in regards to the compiler, etc. on build.kde.org in the past few weeks. The only thing that could have changed would be the version of CMake - as we follow the 'next' branch, so this could be a CMake

Re: Compiling Plasma-Framework with a QT5 compiled with -egl -opengl es2

On Monday 14 of October 2013 16:40:03 Martin Gräßlin wrote: it shouldn't require es2. It's obvious that it needs egl, but it shouldn't need es2. If it does that would be clearly an upstream bug. KWin 4.11 for Wayland requires egl, but doesn't work with es2. ... What if you add the -egl and not