Re: Making polkit-qt-1 a tier1 framework

2016-02-06 Thread David Faure
Talking about polkit-qt-1, your last commit there broke compilation in CI: https://build.kde.org/job/polkit-qt-1%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/5/console kf5-qt5/core/polkitqt1-subject.cpp:186:111: error: ‘polkit_system_bus_name_get_user_sync’ was not declared in this scope

Re: Making polkit-qt-1 a tier1 framework

2016-02-06 Thread David Faure
On Monday 25 January 2016 09:12:50 Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Saturday, January 23, 2016 11:59:28 AM CET David Faure wrote: > > On Thursday 14 January 2016 13:20:01 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I want to suggest to move polkit-qt-1 [1] from kdesupport to frameworks. > > >

Re: Making polkit-qt-1 a tier1 framework

2016-01-25 Thread Martin Graesslin
On Saturday, January 23, 2016 11:59:28 AM CET David Faure wrote: > On Thursday 14 January 2016 13:20:01 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I want to suggest to move polkit-qt-1 [1] from kdesupport to frameworks. > > Reasons are: > > > > * kdesupport is basically what became tier1 in

Re: Making polkit-qt-1 a tier1 framework

2016-01-23 Thread David Faure
On Thursday 14 January 2016 13:20:01 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > Hi all, > > I want to suggest to move polkit-qt-1 [1] from kdesupport to frameworks. > Reasons are: > > * kdesupport is basically what became tier1 in frameworks > * it's used by other frameworks, e.g. KAuth (tier 2) and in >

Making polkit-qt-1 a tier1 framework

2016-01-14 Thread Martin Gräßlin
Hi all, I want to suggest to move polkit-qt-1 [1] from kdesupport to frameworks. Reasons are: * kdesupport is basically what became tier1 in frameworks * it's used by other frameworks, e.g. KAuth (tier 2) and in kde/workspace * polkit-qt-1 is currently in a not really released state (last

Re: Making polkit-qt-1 a tier1 framework

2016-01-14 Thread Aleix Pol
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > Hi all, > > I want to suggest to move polkit-qt-1 [1] from kdesupport to frameworks. > Reasons are: > > * kdesupport is basically what became tier1 in frameworks > * it's used by other frameworks, e.g. KAuth (tier 2) and

Re: Making polkit-qt-1 a tier1 framework

2016-01-14 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Thursday, 14 January 2016 13:20:01 CET Martin Gräßlin wrote: > By moving it to frameworks we get closer to getting rid of kdesupport > and get the making releases problem solved once and for all: bug fixes > will get to users in a timely manner. > > Opinions? Personally I like it.

Re: Making polkit-qt-1 a tier1 framework

2016-01-14 Thread Martin Bříza
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:20:01 +0100, Martin Gräßlin wrote: Hi all, I want to suggest to move polkit-qt-1 [1] from kdesupport to frameworks. Reasons are: * kdesupport is basically what became tier1 in frameworks * it's used by other frameworks, e.g. KAuth (tier 2) and

Re: Making polkit-qt-1 a tier1 framework

2016-01-14 Thread Martin Gräßlin
Am 2016-01-14 18:40, schrieb David Edmundson: On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: Hi all, I want to suggest to move polkit-qt-1 [1] from kdesupport to frameworks. Reasons are: * kdesupport is basically what became tier1 in frameworks * it's used by