Talking about polkit-qt-1, your last commit there broke compilation in CI:
https://build.kde.org/job/polkit-qt-1%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/5/console
kf5-qt5/core/polkitqt1-subject.cpp:186:111: error:
‘polkit_system_bus_name_get_user_sync’ was not declared in this scope
On Monday 25 January 2016 09:12:50 Martin Graesslin wrote:
> On Saturday, January 23, 2016 11:59:28 AM CET David Faure wrote:
> > On Thursday 14 January 2016 13:20:01 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I want to suggest to move polkit-qt-1 [1] from kdesupport to frameworks.
> > >
On Saturday, January 23, 2016 11:59:28 AM CET David Faure wrote:
> On Thursday 14 January 2016 13:20:01 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I want to suggest to move polkit-qt-1 [1] from kdesupport to frameworks.
> > Reasons are:
> >
> > * kdesupport is basically what became tier1 in
On Thursday 14 January 2016 13:20:01 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to suggest to move polkit-qt-1 [1] from kdesupport to frameworks.
> Reasons are:
>
> * kdesupport is basically what became tier1 in frameworks
> * it's used by other frameworks, e.g. KAuth (tier 2) and in
>
Hi all,
I want to suggest to move polkit-qt-1 [1] from kdesupport to frameworks.
Reasons are:
* kdesupport is basically what became tier1 in frameworks
* it's used by other frameworks, e.g. KAuth (tier 2) and in
kde/workspace
* polkit-qt-1 is currently in a not really released state (last
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to suggest to move polkit-qt-1 [1] from kdesupport to frameworks.
> Reasons are:
>
> * kdesupport is basically what became tier1 in frameworks
> * it's used by other frameworks, e.g. KAuth (tier 2) and
Hello,
On Thursday, 14 January 2016 13:20:01 CET Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> By moving it to frameworks we get closer to getting rid of kdesupport
> and get the making releases problem solved once and for all: bug fixes
> will get to users in a timely manner.
>
> Opinions?
Personally I like it.
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:20:01 +0100, Martin Gräßlin
wrote:
Hi all,
I want to suggest to move polkit-qt-1 [1] from kdesupport to frameworks.
Reasons are:
* kdesupport is basically what became tier1 in frameworks
* it's used by other frameworks, e.g. KAuth (tier 2) and
Am 2016-01-14 18:40, schrieb David Edmundson:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Martin Gräßlin
wrote:
Hi all,
I want to suggest to move polkit-qt-1 [1] from kdesupport to
frameworks. Reasons are:
* kdesupport is basically what became tier1 in frameworks
* it's used by