---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/
---
(Updated Feb. 5, 2014, 8:10 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/#review48693
---
If this review is obsolete, can you discard it, please?
-
On Jan. 31, 2014, 6:21 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
If this review is obsolete, can you discard it, please?
I'm waiting for an answer to my question above.
- David
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
On Jan. 31, 2014, 6:21 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
If this review is obsolete, can you discard it, please?
David Narváez wrote:
I'm waiting for an answer to my question above.
I would go with Luigi's suggestion. If we determine later that it might be
useful beyond KDocTools, we can
On Jan. 17, 2014, 6:51 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake, lines 166-172
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/1/?file=234284#file234284line166
These should *not* be renamed, as they are compatibility macros.
However, they should probably be moved to
On Jan. 17, 2014, 6:51 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake, lines 166-172
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/1/?file=234284#file234284line166
These should *not* be renamed, as they are compatibility macros.
However, they should probably be moved to
On Jan. 17, 2014, 6:51 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake, lines 166-172
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/1/?file=234284#file234284line166
These should *not* be renamed, as they are compatibility macros.
However, they should probably be moved to
On Jan. 17, 2014, 6:51 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake, lines 166-172
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/1/?file=234284#file234284line166
These should *not* be renamed, as they are compatibility macros.
However, they should probably be moved to
On Jan. 17, 2014, 6:51 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake, lines 166-172
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/1/?file=234284#file234284line166
These should *not* be renamed, as they are compatibility macros.
However, they should probably be moved to
On Jan. 17, 2014, 6:51 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake, lines 166-172
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/1/?file=234284#file234284line166
These should *not* be renamed, as they are compatibility macros.
However, they should probably be moved to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/
---
(Updated Jan. 18, 2014, 1:16 p.m.)
Review request for Documentation, KDE
On Jan. 17, 2014, 6:51 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake, lines 166-172
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/1/?file=234284#file234284line166
These should *not* be renamed, as they are compatibility macros.
However, they should probably be moved to
On Jan. 17, 2014, 6:51 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake, lines 166-172
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/1/?file=234284#file234284line166
These should *not* be renamed, as they are compatibility macros.
However, they should probably be moved to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/
---
Review request for Documentation and KDE Frameworks.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/#review47592
---
KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake
15 matches
Mail list logo
