Re: Review Request 115077: Rename Macros in KF5DocTools to KDE5_
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/ --- (Updated Feb. 5, 2014, 8:10 p.m.) Status -- This change has been discarded. Review request for Documentation, KDE Frameworks and Luigi Toscano. Repository: kdoctools Description --- Part of the overall task of removing mentions of KDE4 from the code. Diffs - KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake 191a2c5 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, David Narváez ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115077: Rename Macros in KF5DocTools to KDE5_
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/#review48693 --- If this review is obsolete, can you discard it, please? - Alex Merry On Jan. 18, 2014, 1:16 p.m., David Narváez wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/ --- (Updated Jan. 18, 2014, 1:16 p.m.) Review request for Documentation, KDE Frameworks and Luigi Toscano. Repository: kdoctools Description --- Part of the overall task of removing mentions of KDE4 from the code. Diffs - KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake 191a2c5 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, David Narváez ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115077: Rename Macros in KF5DocTools to KDE5_
On Jan. 31, 2014, 6:21 p.m., Alex Merry wrote: If this review is obsolete, can you discard it, please? I'm waiting for an answer to my question above. - David --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/#review48693 --- On Jan. 18, 2014, 1:16 p.m., David Narváez wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/ --- (Updated Jan. 18, 2014, 1:16 p.m.) Review request for Documentation, KDE Frameworks and Luigi Toscano. Repository: kdoctools Description --- Part of the overall task of removing mentions of KDE4 from the code. Diffs - KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake 191a2c5 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, David Narváez ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115077: Rename Macros in KF5DocTools to KDE5_
On Jan. 31, 2014, 6:21 p.m., Alex Merry wrote: If this review is obsolete, can you discard it, please? David Narváez wrote: I'm waiting for an answer to my question above. I would go with Luigi's suggestion. If we determine later that it might be useful beyond KDocTools, we can revisit it then. - Alex --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/#review48693 --- On Jan. 18, 2014, 1:16 p.m., David Narváez wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/ --- (Updated Jan. 18, 2014, 1:16 p.m.) Review request for Documentation, KDE Frameworks and Luigi Toscano. Repository: kdoctools Description --- Part of the overall task of removing mentions of KDE4 from the code. Diffs - KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake 191a2c5 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, David Narváez ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115077: Rename Macros in KF5DocTools to KDE5_
On Jan. 17, 2014, 6:51 p.m., Alex Merry wrote: KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake, lines 166-172 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/1/?file=234284#file234284line166 These should *not* be renamed, as they are compatibility macros. However, they should probably be moved to kde4support. Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: I wouldn't rename it indeed. Moving it to KDE4Support can be good indeed, although it kind of defeats the purpose, as you'll need to actually depend on KDE4Support to get the warning. David Narváez wrote: Luigi, your call. Alex Merry wrote: Well, most projects will start off depending on KDE4Support anyway, and if you don't use it I think you should just get an error about the macro not being found. Luigi Toscano wrote: My thoughts: - is the dependency on KDE4Support the first thing a ported application should do? If yes, then the macros can be kept and moved; but please read on; - KDE4_CREATE_HTML_HANDBOOK can be completely removed. It has been deprecated on Wed Aug 15 03:55:48 2007 +, 82f7b6ba0f8be7d314ac780b9a873e98b6be39b2, and it is not used (apart from the definition in kdelibs and kf5/kdoctools). - KDE4_CREATE_HANDBOOK should not be renamed, and it can be moved to KDE4Support (I see that it was already renamed as KDOCTOOLS_CREATE_HANDBOOK in the frameworks-based code) - I see KDE4_SERIALIZE_TOOL has been renamed as well; but it is defined in KDE4Support: http://lxr.kde.org/source/frameworks/kde4support/cmake/modules/FindKDE4Internal.cmake#455 I'm not sure how to deal with this: probably it would be better to define it here and rename it as KDOCTOOLS_blabla. Does it make sense? Alex Merry wrote: In general, yes, the first thing a ported application will do is replace the lines to search for kdelibs4 with lines to find KDE4Support (and other frameworks). I agree that KDE4_CREATE_HTML_HANDBOOK should be removed (along with any other macro that didn't actually do anything in kdelibs4). If KDE4_CREATE_HANDBOOK was a useful macro in kdelibs4, it should move to kde4support (and either be defined as it is here, or forward to KDOCTOOLS_CREATE_HANDBOOK). I have no idea how the KDE4_SERIALIZE_TOOL thing is supposed to work, so I can't comment on that. Luigi Toscano wrote: KDE4_SERIALIZE_TOOL is used only here (kdoctools); I suggest to rename it as KDOCTOOLS_SERIALIZE_TOOL and add its definition (see http://lxr.kde.org/source/kde/kdelibs/cmake/modules/FindKDE4Internal.cmake#721). KDE4_CREATE_HANDBOOK is used everytime there is documentation in kdelibs4-based applications, so yes, we need to keep it somehow for migration purposes :) I'll split this RR into several others covering those changes. - David --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/#review47592 --- On Jan. 18, 2014, 1:16 p.m., David Narváez wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/ --- (Updated Jan. 18, 2014, 1:16 p.m.) Review request for Documentation, KDE Frameworks and Luigi Toscano. Repository: kdoctools Description --- Part of the overall task of removing mentions of KDE4 from the code. Diffs - KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake 191a2c5 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, David Narváez ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115077: Rename Macros in KF5DocTools to KDE5_
On Jan. 17, 2014, 6:51 p.m., Alex Merry wrote: KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake, lines 166-172 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/1/?file=234284#file234284line166 These should *not* be renamed, as they are compatibility macros. However, they should probably be moved to kde4support. Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: I wouldn't rename it indeed. Moving it to KDE4Support can be good indeed, although it kind of defeats the purpose, as you'll need to actually depend on KDE4Support to get the warning. David Narváez wrote: Luigi, your call. Alex Merry wrote: Well, most projects will start off depending on KDE4Support anyway, and if you don't use it I think you should just get an error about the macro not being found. Luigi Toscano wrote: My thoughts: - is the dependency on KDE4Support the first thing a ported application should do? If yes, then the macros can be kept and moved; but please read on; - KDE4_CREATE_HTML_HANDBOOK can be completely removed. It has been deprecated on Wed Aug 15 03:55:48 2007 +, 82f7b6ba0f8be7d314ac780b9a873e98b6be39b2, and it is not used (apart from the definition in kdelibs and kf5/kdoctools). - KDE4_CREATE_HANDBOOK should not be renamed, and it can be moved to KDE4Support (I see that it was already renamed as KDOCTOOLS_CREATE_HANDBOOK in the frameworks-based code) - I see KDE4_SERIALIZE_TOOL has been renamed as well; but it is defined in KDE4Support: http://lxr.kde.org/source/frameworks/kde4support/cmake/modules/FindKDE4Internal.cmake#455 I'm not sure how to deal with this: probably it would be better to define it here and rename it as KDOCTOOLS_blabla. Does it make sense? Alex Merry wrote: In general, yes, the first thing a ported application will do is replace the lines to search for kdelibs4 with lines to find KDE4Support (and other frameworks). I agree that KDE4_CREATE_HTML_HANDBOOK should be removed (along with any other macro that didn't actually do anything in kdelibs4). If KDE4_CREATE_HANDBOOK was a useful macro in kdelibs4, it should move to kde4support (and either be defined as it is here, or forward to KDOCTOOLS_CREATE_HANDBOOK). I have no idea how the KDE4_SERIALIZE_TOOL thing is supposed to work, so I can't comment on that. Luigi Toscano wrote: KDE4_SERIALIZE_TOOL is used only here (kdoctools); I suggest to rename it as KDOCTOOLS_SERIALIZE_TOOL and add its definition (see http://lxr.kde.org/source/kde/kdelibs/cmake/modules/FindKDE4Internal.cmake#721). KDE4_CREATE_HANDBOOK is used everytime there is documentation in kdelibs4-based applications, so yes, we need to keep it somehow for migration purposes :) David Narváez wrote: I'll split this RR into several others covering those changes. Doesn't that serialization tool sound more like ECM? It could be useful if you need to serialize any kind of build. - David --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/#review47592 --- On Jan. 18, 2014, 1:16 p.m., David Narváez wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/ --- (Updated Jan. 18, 2014, 1:16 p.m.) Review request for Documentation, KDE Frameworks and Luigi Toscano. Repository: kdoctools Description --- Part of the overall task of removing mentions of KDE4 from the code. Diffs - KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake 191a2c5 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, David Narváez ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115077: Rename Macros in KF5DocTools to KDE5_
On Jan. 17, 2014, 6:51 p.m., Alex Merry wrote: KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake, lines 166-172 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/1/?file=234284#file234284line166 These should *not* be renamed, as they are compatibility macros. However, they should probably be moved to kde4support. Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: I wouldn't rename it indeed. Moving it to KDE4Support can be good indeed, although it kind of defeats the purpose, as you'll need to actually depend on KDE4Support to get the warning. David Narváez wrote: Luigi, your call. Alex Merry wrote: Well, most projects will start off depending on KDE4Support anyway, and if you don't use it I think you should just get an error about the macro not being found. Luigi Toscano wrote: My thoughts: - is the dependency on KDE4Support the first thing a ported application should do? If yes, then the macros can be kept and moved; but please read on; - KDE4_CREATE_HTML_HANDBOOK can be completely removed. It has been deprecated on Wed Aug 15 03:55:48 2007 +, 82f7b6ba0f8be7d314ac780b9a873e98b6be39b2, and it is not used (apart from the definition in kdelibs and kf5/kdoctools). - KDE4_CREATE_HANDBOOK should not be renamed, and it can be moved to KDE4Support (I see that it was already renamed as KDOCTOOLS_CREATE_HANDBOOK in the frameworks-based code) - I see KDE4_SERIALIZE_TOOL has been renamed as well; but it is defined in KDE4Support: http://lxr.kde.org/source/frameworks/kde4support/cmake/modules/FindKDE4Internal.cmake#455 I'm not sure how to deal with this: probably it would be better to define it here and rename it as KDOCTOOLS_blabla. Does it make sense? In general, yes, the first thing a ported application will do is replace the lines to search for kdelibs4 with lines to find KDE4Support (and other frameworks). I agree that KDE4_CREATE_HTML_HANDBOOK should be removed (along with any other macro that didn't actually do anything in kdelibs4). If KDE4_CREATE_HANDBOOK was a useful macro in kdelibs4, it should move to kde4support (and either be defined as it is here, or forward to KDOCTOOLS_CREATE_HANDBOOK). I have no idea how the KDE4_SERIALIZE_TOOL thing is supposed to work, so I can't comment on that. - Alex --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/#review47592 --- On Jan. 18, 2014, 1:16 p.m., David Narváez wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/ --- (Updated Jan. 18, 2014, 1:16 p.m.) Review request for Documentation, KDE Frameworks and Luigi Toscano. Repository: kdoctools Description --- Part of the overall task of removing mentions of KDE4 from the code. Diffs - KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake 191a2c5 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, David Narváez ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115077: Rename Macros in KF5DocTools to KDE5_
On Jan. 17, 2014, 6:51 p.m., Alex Merry wrote: KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake, lines 166-172 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/1/?file=234284#file234284line166 These should *not* be renamed, as they are compatibility macros. However, they should probably be moved to kde4support. Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: I wouldn't rename it indeed. Moving it to KDE4Support can be good indeed, although it kind of defeats the purpose, as you'll need to actually depend on KDE4Support to get the warning. David Narváez wrote: Luigi, your call. Alex Merry wrote: Well, most projects will start off depending on KDE4Support anyway, and if you don't use it I think you should just get an error about the macro not being found. Luigi Toscano wrote: My thoughts: - is the dependency on KDE4Support the first thing a ported application should do? If yes, then the macros can be kept and moved; but please read on; - KDE4_CREATE_HTML_HANDBOOK can be completely removed. It has been deprecated on Wed Aug 15 03:55:48 2007 +, 82f7b6ba0f8be7d314ac780b9a873e98b6be39b2, and it is not used (apart from the definition in kdelibs and kf5/kdoctools). - KDE4_CREATE_HANDBOOK should not be renamed, and it can be moved to KDE4Support (I see that it was already renamed as KDOCTOOLS_CREATE_HANDBOOK in the frameworks-based code) - I see KDE4_SERIALIZE_TOOL has been renamed as well; but it is defined in KDE4Support: http://lxr.kde.org/source/frameworks/kde4support/cmake/modules/FindKDE4Internal.cmake#455 I'm not sure how to deal with this: probably it would be better to define it here and rename it as KDOCTOOLS_blabla. Does it make sense? Alex Merry wrote: In general, yes, the first thing a ported application will do is replace the lines to search for kdelibs4 with lines to find KDE4Support (and other frameworks). I agree that KDE4_CREATE_HTML_HANDBOOK should be removed (along with any other macro that didn't actually do anything in kdelibs4). If KDE4_CREATE_HANDBOOK was a useful macro in kdelibs4, it should move to kde4support (and either be defined as it is here, or forward to KDOCTOOLS_CREATE_HANDBOOK). I have no idea how the KDE4_SERIALIZE_TOOL thing is supposed to work, so I can't comment on that. KDE4_SERIALIZE_TOOL is used only here (kdoctools); I suggest to rename it as KDOCTOOLS_SERIALIZE_TOOL and add its definition (see http://lxr.kde.org/source/kde/kdelibs/cmake/modules/FindKDE4Internal.cmake#721). KDE4_CREATE_HANDBOOK is used everytime there is documentation in kdelibs4-based applications, so yes, we need to keep it somehow for migration purposes :) - Luigi --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/#review47592 --- On Jan. 18, 2014, 1:16 p.m., David Narváez wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/ --- (Updated Jan. 18, 2014, 1:16 p.m.) Review request for Documentation, KDE Frameworks and Luigi Toscano. Repository: kdoctools Description --- Part of the overall task of removing mentions of KDE4 from the code. Diffs - KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake 191a2c5 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, David Narváez ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115077: Rename Macros in KF5DocTools to KDE5_
On Jan. 17, 2014, 6:51 p.m., Alex Merry wrote: KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake, lines 166-172 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/1/?file=234284#file234284line166 These should *not* be renamed, as they are compatibility macros. However, they should probably be moved to kde4support. I wouldn't rename it indeed. Moving it to KDE4Support can be good indeed, although it kind of defeats the purpose, as you'll need to actually depend on KDE4Support to get the warning. - Aleix --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/#review47592 --- On Jan. 17, 2014, 3:14 p.m., David Narváez wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/ --- (Updated Jan. 17, 2014, 3:14 p.m.) Review request for Documentation and KDE Frameworks. Repository: kdoctools Description --- Part of the overall task of removing mentions of KDE4 from the code. Diffs - KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake 191a2c5 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, David Narváez ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115077: Rename Macros in KF5DocTools to KDE5_
On Jan. 17, 2014, 6:51 p.m., Alex Merry wrote: KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake, lines 166-172 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/1/?file=234284#file234284line166 These should *not* be renamed, as they are compatibility macros. However, they should probably be moved to kde4support. Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: I wouldn't rename it indeed. Moving it to KDE4Support can be good indeed, although it kind of defeats the purpose, as you'll need to actually depend on KDE4Support to get the warning. Luigi, your call. - David --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/#review47592 --- On Jan. 17, 2014, 3:14 p.m., David Narváez wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/ --- (Updated Jan. 17, 2014, 3:14 p.m.) Review request for Documentation and KDE Frameworks. Repository: kdoctools Description --- Part of the overall task of removing mentions of KDE4 from the code. Diffs - KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake 191a2c5 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, David Narváez ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115077: Rename Macros in KF5DocTools to KDE5_
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/ --- (Updated Jan. 18, 2014, 1:16 p.m.) Review request for Documentation, KDE Frameworks and Luigi Toscano. Changes --- Adding maintainer explicitly Repository: kdoctools Description --- Part of the overall task of removing mentions of KDE4 from the code. Diffs - KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake 191a2c5 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, David Narváez ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115077: Rename Macros in KF5DocTools to KDE5_
On Jan. 17, 2014, 6:51 p.m., Alex Merry wrote: KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake, lines 166-172 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/1/?file=234284#file234284line166 These should *not* be renamed, as they are compatibility macros. However, they should probably be moved to kde4support. Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: I wouldn't rename it indeed. Moving it to KDE4Support can be good indeed, although it kind of defeats the purpose, as you'll need to actually depend on KDE4Support to get the warning. David Narváez wrote: Luigi, your call. Well, most projects will start off depending on KDE4Support anyway, and if you don't use it I think you should just get an error about the macro not being found. - Alex --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/#review47592 --- On Jan. 18, 2014, 1:16 p.m., David Narváez wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/ --- (Updated Jan. 18, 2014, 1:16 p.m.) Review request for Documentation, KDE Frameworks and Luigi Toscano. Repository: kdoctools Description --- Part of the overall task of removing mentions of KDE4 from the code. Diffs - KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake 191a2c5 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, David Narváez ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115077: Rename Macros in KF5DocTools to KDE5_
On Jan. 17, 2014, 6:51 p.m., Alex Merry wrote: KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake, lines 166-172 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/1/?file=234284#file234284line166 These should *not* be renamed, as they are compatibility macros. However, they should probably be moved to kde4support. Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: I wouldn't rename it indeed. Moving it to KDE4Support can be good indeed, although it kind of defeats the purpose, as you'll need to actually depend on KDE4Support to get the warning. David Narváez wrote: Luigi, your call. Alex Merry wrote: Well, most projects will start off depending on KDE4Support anyway, and if you don't use it I think you should just get an error about the macro not being found. My thoughts: - is the dependency on KDE4Support the first thing a ported application should do? If yes, then the macros can be kept and moved; but please read on; - KDE4_CREATE_HTML_HANDBOOK can be completely removed. It has been deprecated on Wed Aug 15 03:55:48 2007 +, 82f7b6ba0f8be7d314ac780b9a873e98b6be39b2, and it is not used (apart from the definition in kdelibs and kf5/kdoctools). - KDE4_CREATE_HANDBOOK should not be renamed, and it can be moved to KDE4Support (I see that it was already renamed as KDOCTOOLS_CREATE_HANDBOOK in the frameworks-based code) - I see KDE4_SERIALIZE_TOOL has been renamed as well; but it is defined in KDE4Support: http://lxr.kde.org/source/frameworks/kde4support/cmake/modules/FindKDE4Internal.cmake#455 I'm not sure how to deal with this: probably it would be better to define it here and rename it as KDOCTOOLS_blabla. Does it make sense? - Luigi --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/#review47592 --- On Jan. 18, 2014, 1:16 p.m., David Narváez wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/ --- (Updated Jan. 18, 2014, 1:16 p.m.) Review request for Documentation, KDE Frameworks and Luigi Toscano. Repository: kdoctools Description --- Part of the overall task of removing mentions of KDE4 from the code. Diffs - KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake 191a2c5 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, David Narváez ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Review Request 115077: Rename Macros in KF5DocTools to KDE5_
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/ --- Review request for Documentation and KDE Frameworks. Repository: kdoctools Description --- Part of the overall task of removing mentions of KDE4 from the code. Diffs - KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake 191a2c5 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, David Narváez ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115077: Rename Macros in KF5DocTools to KDE5_
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/#review47592 --- KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/#comment33794 These should *not* be renamed, as they are compatibility macros. However, they should probably be moved to kde4support. - Alex Merry On Jan. 17, 2014, 3:14 p.m., David Narváez wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/ --- (Updated Jan. 17, 2014, 3:14 p.m.) Review request for Documentation and KDE Frameworks. Repository: kdoctools Description --- Part of the overall task of removing mentions of KDE4 from the code. Diffs - KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake 191a2c5 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, David Narváez ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
