---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129798/
---
(Updated Feb. 5, 2017, 4:30 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
> On Feb. 5, 2017, 10:45 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Patch looks ok to me, although I don't know much about all this.
> >
> > The real problem isn't tooling, but lack of active maintainership for
> > kfilemetadata. Are you interested in taking over?
>
> Matthieu Gallien wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Feb. 5, 2017, 9:45 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Patch looks ok to me, although I don't know much about all this.
> >
> > The real problem isn't tooling, but lack of active maintainership for
> > kfilemetadata. Are you interested in taking over?
>
> Matthieu Gallien wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Feb. 5, 2017, 10:45 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Patch looks ok to me, although I don't know much about all this.
> >
> > The real problem isn't tooling, but lack of active maintainership for
> > kfilemetadata. Are you interested in taking over?
Hello,
I have a real interest in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129798/#review102399
---
Ship it!
Patch looks ok to me, although I don't know
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129798/#review102338
---
Should I move the review request to phabricator ?
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129798/
---
(Updated Jan. 15, 2017, 4:03 p.m.)
Review request for Baloo and KDE
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129798/
---
Review request for Baloo and KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kfilemetadata
