Re: Tier status of attica kwallet

2014-02-01 Thread David Faure
On Friday 24 January 2014 20:33:14 Valentin Rusu wrote: On Saturday, January 25, 2014 01:49:51 AM Michael Palimaka wrote: On 01/24/2014 09:21 AM, Alex Merry wrote: On 23/01/14 21:50, Valentin Rusu wrote: On Thursday, January 23, 2014 11:18:02 PM Michael Palimaka wrote: On 01/23/2014

Re: Tier status of attica kwallet

2014-01-28 Thread Valentin Rusu
On Thursday, January 23, 2014 11:18:02 PM Michael Palimaka wrote: On 01/23/2014 08:21 AM, Valentin Rusu wrote: On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote: Sure, the framework itself is still tier 2...but the repo also includes kwalletd which definitely is not tier 2,

Re: Tier status of attica kwallet

2014-01-25 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 01/25/2014 08:19 AM, Valentin Rusu wrote: On Friday, January 24, 2014 07:22:22 AM Kevin Ottens wrote: On Thursday 23 January 2014 22:47:45 Valentin Rusu wrote: On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:48:00 PM Kevin Ottens wrote: On Wednesday 22 January 2014 22:21:47 Valentin Rusu wrote: On

Re: Tier status of attica kwallet

2014-01-24 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 01/24/2014 09:21 AM, Alex Merry wrote: On 23/01/14 21:50, Valentin Rusu wrote: On Thursday, January 23, 2014 11:18:02 PM Michael Palimaka wrote: On 01/23/2014 08:21 AM, Valentin Rusu wrote: On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote: Sure, the framework itself is

Re: Tier status of attica kwallet

2014-01-24 Thread Valentin Rusu
On Saturday, January 25, 2014 01:49:51 AM Michael Palimaka wrote: On 01/24/2014 09:21 AM, Alex Merry wrote: On 23/01/14 21:50, Valentin Rusu wrote: On Thursday, January 23, 2014 11:18:02 PM Michael Palimaka wrote: On 01/23/2014 08:21 AM, Valentin Rusu wrote: On Thursday, January 23, 2014

Re: Tier status of attica kwallet

2014-01-24 Thread Valentin Rusu
On Friday, January 24, 2014 07:22:22 AM Kevin Ottens wrote: On Thursday 23 January 2014 22:47:45 Valentin Rusu wrote: On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:48:00 PM Kevin Ottens wrote: On Wednesday 22 January 2014 22:21:47 Valentin Rusu wrote: On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM

Re: Tier status of attica kwallet

2014-01-23 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 01/23/2014 08:21 AM, Valentin Rusu wrote: On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote: Hi, attica seems to have been absorbed as a framework, but does not appear to have been assigned a tier. Based on its dependencies, it looks like it would fit in tier 1? kwallet

Re: Tier status of attica kwallet

2014-01-23 Thread Valentin Rusu
On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:48:00 PM Kevin Ottens wrote: On Wednesday 22 January 2014 22:21:47 Valentin Rusu wrote: On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote: Hi, attica seems to have been absorbed as a framework, but does not appear to have been

Re: Tier status of attica kwallet

2014-01-23 Thread Valentin Rusu
On Thursday, January 23, 2014 11:18:02 PM Michael Palimaka wrote: On 01/23/2014 08:21 AM, Valentin Rusu wrote: On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote: Sure, the framework itself is still tier 2...but the repo also includes kwalletd which definitely is not tier 2, and

Re: Tier status of attica kwallet

2014-01-23 Thread Alex Merry
On 23/01/14 21:50, Valentin Rusu wrote: On Thursday, January 23, 2014 11:18:02 PM Michael Palimaka wrote: On 01/23/2014 08:21 AM, Valentin Rusu wrote: On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote: Sure, the framework itself is still tier 2...but the repo also includes

Re: Tier status of attica kwallet

2014-01-23 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Thursday 23 January 2014 22:47:45 Valentin Rusu wrote: On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:48:00 PM Kevin Ottens wrote: On Wednesday 22 January 2014 22:21:47 Valentin Rusu wrote: On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote: Hi, attica seems to have been

Tier status of attica kwallet

2014-01-22 Thread Michael Palimaka
Hi, attica seems to have been absorbed as a framework, but does not appear to have been assigned a tier. Based on its dependencies, it looks like it would fit in tier 1? kwallet is in tier 2, but since b60582640d99e0ef603bf4e02df974793fb5ad27 it includes kwalletd which depends on higher tier

Re: Tier status of attica kwallet

2014-01-22 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 04:24:37AM +1100, Michael Palimaka wrote: attica seems to have been absorbed as a framework, but does not appear to have been assigned a tier. Based on its dependencies, it looks like it would fit in tier 1? The library was renamed to KF5Attica in the expectation it

Re: Tier status of attica kwallet

2014-01-22 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Wednesday, 2014-01-22, 17:35:50, Jonathan Riddell wrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 04:24:37AM +1100, Michael Palimaka wrote: attica seems to have been absorbed as a framework, but does not appear to have been assigned a tier. Based on its dependencies, it looks like it would fit in tier 1?

Re: Tier status of attica kwallet

2014-01-22 Thread Valentin Rusu
On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote: Hi, attica seems to have been absorbed as a framework, but does not appear to have been assigned a tier. Based on its dependencies, it looks like it would fit in tier 1? kwallet is in tier 2, but since

Re: Tier status of attica kwallet

2014-01-22 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Wednesday 22 January 2014 22:21:47 Valentin Rusu wrote: On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote: Hi, attica seems to have been absorbed as a framework, but does not appear to have been assigned a tier. Based on its dependencies, it looks like it would fit in