On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 21:45 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
Paul didn't really give any indication what kernel he was running or
what config he was using.
In the cover letter I mentioned i686. Full details are:
$ uname -i -m -o -p -r -s -v
Linux 2.6.38-0.rc2.git9.1.fc15.i686 #1 SMP Tue Feb 1 03:11:57
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 21:45 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
Paul didn't really give any indication what kernel he was running or
what config he was using.
In the cover letter I mentioned i686. Full details are:
$ uname -i -m -o -p
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 10:27 -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
I am concerned about the error you are seeing, -95. Is it possible you can
provide me a 'dmesg' log of your boot up. I want to see what chipset the
perf subsystem thinks it found.
Sure, no problem. Off-list or on-list?
And what messages
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 06:32:33PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 10:27 -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
I am concerned about the error you are seeing, -95. Is it possible you can
provide me a 'dmesg' log of your boot up. I want to see what chipset the
perf subsystem thinks it
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 13:38 -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
[All] I am interested in is the few
lines above the NMI watchdog error that starts with Performance Events:
[0.016136] Performance Events:
[0.016139] no APIC, boot with the lapic boot parameter to force-enable it
[0.016142] no
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 08:42:34PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 13:38 -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
[All] I am interested in is the few
lines above the NMI watchdog error that starts with Performance Events:
[0.016136] Performance Events:
[0.016139] no APIC, boot
