[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1933248] Re: please drop virtualbox-guest-dkms virtualbox-guest-source

2021-09-23 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
reading old modules... MISS: vboxguest (ignored) MISS: vboxsf (ignored) In the current kerenl. So it appears that building with a dkms module got dropped, and yet the guest modules from upstream code have not been built either. And i am able to reproduce

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1933248] Re: please drop virtualbox-guest-dkms virtualbox-guest-source

2021-09-23 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
linux (5.4.0-87.98) focal; urgency=medium * please drop virtualbox-guest-dkms virtualbox-guest-source (LP: #1933248) - [Config] Disable virtualbox dkms build Disabled do_dkms_vbox, because src:virtualbox got srued into Focal which no longer provides virtualbox-guest-dkms I fear/wonder

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1933248] Re: please drop virtualbox-guest-dkms virtualbox-guest-source

2021-09-23 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
I was not expecting for focal/linux to change. This change was expected to be done in impish/linux only. How can I figure out why this was done in focal/linux? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1912811] Re: Update dwarves-dfsg in focal to version 1.21 from impish

2021-09-20 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Uploaded new dwarves-dfsg SRUs that use embeded libbpf (which in turn is updated to the same source as used in impish). This makes dwarves-dfsg SRU stand-alone, without introducing or upgrading the system-wide libbpf. ** Changed in: libbpf (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix **

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1939287] Re: dbgsym package is missing for ubuntu focal hwe kernel 5.11

2021-09-20 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: linux-hwe-5.13 (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: linux-hwe-5.13 (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subs

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1939287] Re: dbgsym package is missing for ubuntu focal hwe kernel 5.11

2021-09-20 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + * Due to disk space constraints previously hwe-5.11 disabled building + dbgsyms packages + + * This has been resolved in hwe-5.13, thus builds with debug symbols + can be re-enabled + + [Test Plan] + + * Build new kernel, check that dbgsyms packages

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1939287] Re: dbgsym package is missing for ubuntu focal hwe kernel 5.11

2021-09-20 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Also affects: linux-hwe-5.13 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-hwe-5.13 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939287 Title: dbgsym package is missing for

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1942806] Re: Unmatched enable poweroff, LEDs, mmap PCI

2021-09-06 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Description changed: [Impact]  * Unable to use gpio-poweroff driver to poweroff via u-boot/opensbi/kernel  * Unable to use LED colors  * Unable to mmap PCI resources  * Cherrypick dtb changes from meta-sifive 2021.08 release

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1942806] Re: Unmatched enable poweroff, LEDs, mmap PCI

2021-09-06 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Description changed: [Impact] - * Unable to use gpio-poweroff driver to poweroff via u-boot/opensbi/kernel - * Unable to use LED colors - * Unable to mmap PCI resources +  * Unable to use gpio-poweroff driver to poweroff via u-boot/opensbi/kernel +  * Unable to use LED colors +  *

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1942806] [NEW] Unmatched enable poweroff, LEDs, mmap PCI

2021-09-06 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
extensions, which is a step backwards. OpenSBI v0.1 will not be available in the future. ** Affects: linux-riscv (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: linux-riscv (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dimitri J

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1939287] Re: dbgsym package is missing for ubuntu focal hwe kernel 5.11

2021-09-06 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
The security PPA where 5.11.0-27 was built has "build dbgsyms" checked but not "publish dbgsyms" this seems odd, cause i would think it is useful to have access to published security ppa dbgsymbols. Removing debug symbols is not nice. However, surely we can make disk space savings the other way.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1939287] Re: dbgsym package is missing for ubuntu focal hwe kernel 5.11

2021-09-06 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: linux-hwe-5.11 (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) ** Changed in: linux-hwe-5.11 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages,

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1938748] Re: test_320_config_arm_pan from ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security failed on F-oracle-5.4 / H-oracle-5.11 ARM64

2021-09-03 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Imho we must enabled it, especially for Oracle, since compute nodes may be shared between multiple tenants. It would be also interesting to check if the hardware used with this kernel does not have errata / issues discussed in https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg788470.html i.e. that it

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1928679] Re: Support importing mokx keys into revocation list from the mok table

2021-09-01 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
# grep CODENAME /etc/os-release VERSION_CODENAME=focal UBUNTU_CODENAME=focal # uname -r 5.11.0-34-generic dmesg: [0.797134] blacklist: Loading compiled-in revocation X.509 certificates [0.797696] Loaded X.509 cert 'Canonical Ltd. Secure Boot Signing:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1932029] Re: Support builtin revoked certificates

2021-09-01 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1928679/comments/7 ** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1942319] [NEW] When booting with UEFI, mokvar table and %:.platform keyring must be available

2021-09-01 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Public bug reported: When booting with UEFI, mokvar table and %:.platform keyring must be available ** Affects: linux-kvm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-kvm

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1928679] Re: Support importing mokx keys into revocation list from the mok table

2021-09-01 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
# uname -r 5.11.0-34-generic # sudo keyctl list %:.platform 3 keys in keyring: 149920180: ---lswrv 0 0 asymmetric: Microsoft Windows Production PCA 2011: a92902398e16c49778cd90f99e4f9ae17c55af53 434591909: ---lswrv 0 0 asymmetric: Canonical Ltd. Master Certificate Authority:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1932029] Re: Support builtin revoked certificates

2021-09-01 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1928679/comments/6 ** Tags removed: verification-needed-hirsute ** Tags added: verification-done-hirsute -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1928679] Re: Support importing mokx keys into revocation list from the mok table

2021-09-01 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Verifying using hirsute: # uname -r 5.11.0-1014-kvm # grep CODENAME /etc/os-release VERSION_CODENAME=hirsute UBUNTU_CODENAME=hirsute # keyctl list %:.blacklist Can't find 'keyring:.blacklist' Upgraded kernel: # uname -r 5.11.0-1015-kvm # keyctl list %:.blacklist 1 key in keyring: 330780907:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1928679] Re: Support importing mokx keys into revocation list from the mok table

2021-09-01 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Disabled initrd less boot, and installing linux-generic kernel from proposed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928679 Title: Support importing mokx keys into revocation

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1836144] Re: report build full log if failing under autopkgtest

2021-08-31 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
for failed results, in artifacts, all make.logs are stored and available for download and inspection. ** Changed in: dkms (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to dkms in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1936237] Re: use the upstream version for the kernel packaging

2021-08-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Triaged ** Tags added: apport-collected -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1936237 Title: use the upstream

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1941622] Re: Bump unmatched CPU clock rate to 1.5GHz

2021-08-25 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** No longer affects: linux-riscv (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-riscv in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941622 Title: Bump unmatched CPU clock rate to 1.5GHz Status in u-boot package in

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1941622] [NEW] Bump unmatched CPU clock rate to 1.5GHz

2021-08-25 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Public bug reported: [Impact] Bump unmatched CPU clock rate to 1.5GHz Multiple users report that running unmatched at 1.5GHz is stable, and gives one performance. Lets bump clock speed to 1.5GHz in u-boot and kernel. [Test Plan] * System with these patches boots, operates normally without

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1941610] Re: RM old binaries for superseded abi 1016 in focal-proposed

2021-08-25 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-gcp-5.11 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-restricted-modules-gcp-5.11 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941610 Title:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1941612] Re: RM old binaries for superseded abi 1015 in focal-proposed

2021-08-25 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-oracle-5.11 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-restricted-modules-oracle-5.11 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941612

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1941608] Re: RM old binaries for superseded abi 1015 in focal-proposed

2021-08-25 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-aws-5.11 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-restricted-modules-aws-5.11 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941608 Title:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1941612] [NEW] RM old binaries for superseded abi 1015 in focal-proposed

2021-08-25 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Public bug reported: oracle 5.11.0-1015 kernel is no longer published in focal. but nvidia modules for it remain in focal-proposed, preventing lrm- oracle-5.11 from migrating. please remove the following binaries: old binaries left on amd64 linux-modules-nvidia-390-5.11.0-1015-oracle

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1941610] [NEW] RM old binaries for superseded abi 1016 in focal-proposed

2021-08-25 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Public bug reported: gcp 5.11.0-1016 kernel is no longer published in focal. but nvidia modules for it remain in focal-proposed, preventing lrm- gcp-5.11 from migrating. please remove the following binaries: old binaries left on amd64: linux-modules-nvidia-390-5.11.0-1016-gcp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1941608] [NEW] RM old binaries for superseded abi 1015 in focal-proposed

2021-08-25 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Public bug reported: aws 5.11.0-1015 kernel is no longer published in focal. but nvidia modules for it remain in focal-proposed, preventing lrm- aws-5.11 from migrating. please remove the following binaries: old binaries left on amd64: linux-modules-nvidia-390-5.11.0-1015-aws

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1940972] Re: v5.13 kernel ftrace selftest fails on riscv64 unmatched

2021-08-24 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
[10052.121189] rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU [10052.126125] rcu: 1-: (14995 ticks this GP) idle=a3a/1/0x4002 softirq=116019/116019 fqs=7426 [10080.057250] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 82s! [ftracetest:30662] [10124.057368] watchdog: BUG:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1940972] Re: v5.13 kernel ftrace selftest fails on riscv64 unmatched

2021-08-24 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Description changed: $ sudo make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS=ftrace run_tests ... # [32] ftrace - Max stack tracer [FAIL] ... + Testing using 5.13.0-1002.2 - Testing using 5.13.0-1002.2 + the full ftrace suite takes just over 2 hours on unmatched. -- You received

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1940972] [NEW] v5.13 kernel ftrace selftest fails on riscv64 unmatched

2021-08-24 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Public bug reported: $ sudo make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS=ftrace run_tests ... # [32] ftrace - Max stack tracer[FAIL] ... Testing using 5.13.0-1002.2 the full ftrace suite takes just over 2 hours on unmatched. ** Affects: ubuntu-kernel-tests Importance: Undecided

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1940426] Re: Disable ftrace of sbi functions

2021-08-18 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Also affects: linux-riscv-5.11 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: linux-riscv-5.11 (Ubuntu Hirsute) ** Changed in: linux-riscv-5.11 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: linux-riscv-5.11 (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Confirmed

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1934548] Re: RISC-V: Illegal instruction

2021-08-18 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Also affects: linux-riscv (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-riscv-5.11 (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux-riscv (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: linux-riscv-5.11 (Ubuntu

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1940426] [NEW] Disable ftrace of sbi functions

2021-08-18 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Public bug reported: [Impact] * A kernel build can fail to boot with Oops and illegal instruction as seen at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux- riscv-5.11/+bug/1934548 on Unmatched board. * One cannot frace functions, used in frace setup. On RISC-V these are sbi calls to

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1912811] Re: Update dwarves-dfsg in focal to version 1.21 from hirsute

2021-08-18 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
backports is no good, as it needs to be kernel's build-dep. and most kernels are built in -security only pocket. also, nothing else really uses these, apart from kernel. And kernels have stop using these, because they are too old in focal. ** Changed in: dwarves-dfsg (Ubuntu Focal)

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1939937] Re: ath10k: "add target IRAM recovery feature support" breaks QCA9984 Firmware load capability

2021-08-17 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939937 Title: ath10k: "add target IRAM recovery feature support" breaks

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1939937] Re: ath10k: "add target IRAM recovery feature support" breaks QCA9984 Firmware load capability

2021-08-17 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Tags added: hirsute impish patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939937 Title: ath10k: "add target IRAM recovery feature support" breaks QCA9984 Firmware load

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1940080] [NEW] ubuntu-kernel-selftests.ftrace fails on riscv64

2021-08-16 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Public bug reported: 08/12 22:10:03 DEBUG| utils:0153| [stdout] # === Ftrace unit tests === 08/12 22:10:07 DEBUG| utils:0153| [stdout] # [1] Basic trace file check [PASS] 08/12 22:10:45 DEBUG| utils:0153| [stdout] # [2] Basic test for tracers [PASS] 08/12 22:10:51 DEBUG|

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1939887] Re: ubuntu_kernel_selftests.net times out on riscv64 unmatched hirsute & focal mailing multi_check_sendfile tests terminated by timeout in multiple tls 12 13 configurat

2021-08-16 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1900644 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900644 ** Summary changed: - ubuntu_kernel_selftests.net times out on riscv64 unmatched hirsute & focal + ubuntu_kernel_selftests.net times out on riscv64 unmatched hirsute & focal mailing multi_check_sendfile

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1939887] Re: ubuntu_kernel_selftests.net times out on riscv64 unmatched hirsute & focal

2021-08-16 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-riscv in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939887 Title: ubuntu_kernel_selftests.net times out on riscv64 unmatched hirsute & focal Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests: New

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1905728] Re: log_check / tainted_check failed in ubuntu_boot because of warnings (Found insecure W+X mapping at address) found on F/G/H-riscv

2021-08-16 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
v5.13 in impish-proposed has this fixed on riscv. it will not be backported to earlier series, hence marking hirsute as wontfix. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Impish) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1939887] Re: selftests net times out

2021-08-16 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Also affects: ubuntu-kernel-tests Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags added: focal riscv64 ** Summary changed: - selftests net times out + ubuntu_kernel_selftests.net times out on riscv64 unmatched hirsute & focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1934548] Re: RISC-V: Illegal instruction

2021-08-13 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Focal ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ dmesg | grep gcc [0.00] Linux version 5.11.0-1017-generic (buildd@riscv64-qemu-lcy01-062) (gcc-10 (Ubuntu 10.3.0-1ubuntu1~20.04) 10.3.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.34) #18~20.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Aug 12 00:38:00 UTC 2021 (Ubuntu

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1939887] [NEW] selftests net times out

2021-08-13 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Public bug reported: 872621:59:37 INFO | Timer expired (1800 sec.), nuking pid 10418 872721:59:38 INFO | ERROR ubuntu_kernel_selftests.netubuntu_kernel_selftests.net timestamp=1628805578localtime=Aug 12 21:59:38

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1934548] Re: RISC-V: Illegal instruction

2021-08-13 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Hirsute: $ uname -a Linux ubuntu 5.11.0-1017-generic #18-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 11 18:02:14 UTC 2021 riscv64 riscv64 riscv64 GNU/Linux $ systemctl is-system-running running $ sudo dmesg | grep gcc [0.00] Linux version 5.11.0-1017-generic (buildd@riscv64-qemu-lcy01-065) (gcc (Ubuntu

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1934548] Re: RISC-V: Illegal instruction

2021-08-11 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: linux-riscv (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux-riscv-5.11 (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Also affects: linux-riscv (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-riscv-5.11

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1934548] Re: RISC-V: Illegal instruction

2021-08-11 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
@cascardo it works https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2021-August/123090.html ** Changed in: linux-riscv-5.11 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: linux-riscv (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: linux-riscv-5.11 (Ubuntu)

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1939535] [NEW] unmatched quiet boot has messages

2021-08-11 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Public bug reported: [ 15.446646] fu740-pcie e.pcie: invalid resource [ 15.792898] L2CACHE: DataError @ 0x0008.04B0 [ 16.630923] da9063 0-0058: Chip variant not supported for DA9063 [ 16.746772] macb 1009.ethernet: GEM doesn't support hardware ptp. [FAILED] Failed to

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1934548] Re: RISC-V: Illegal instruction

2021-08-10 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
https://people.canonical.com/~xnox/lp1934548/ findings published at above location. I am giving up at this point and need to handover to someone else. Is there a way to attach gdb over jtag to unmatched board whilst it is attempting to boot? Is there a way to analyze the vmlinuz image to figure

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1939142] Re: linux-riscv-5.11 1015 panics on unmatched

2021-08-10 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1934548 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934548 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1934548 RISC-V: Illegal instruction -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1938530] Re: arm64: virtio_blk is not included in the initramfs

2021-08-10 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Something like this https://github.com/snapcore/core- initrd/pull/34/files should do it. Plus respinning the pc-kernel arm64 & armhf kernel snaps. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-meta in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1938530] Re: arm64: virtio_blk is not included in the initramfs

2021-08-10 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
$ git grep virtio_blk features/server/usr/lib/modules-load.d/ubuntu-core-server.conf:virtio_blk When building initrd into the generic arm64 kernel snap, we should enable feature "server" like we do on x86. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1938530] Re: arm64: virtio_blk is not included in the initramfs

2021-08-10 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Doing this in "kernel-snaps-uc20" git repo would be tricky, as at the moment we don't pass any option when making kernel snaps. Otherwise core-initd itself defaults to "main server" on x86, but just "main" on all other arches. Maybe we should enable "server" features for "generic" kernel flavours

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1934548] Re: RISC-V: Illegal instruction

2021-08-09 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
added more pr_info calls inside ftrace_update_code.. and things boot now for me. = -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-riscv in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934548 Title: RISC-V: Illegal

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1934548] Re: RISC-V: Illegal instruction

2021-08-09 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
[0.00] XNOX kernel/trace/ftrace.c(6255) ftrace_process_locs: [0.00] XNOX kernel/trace/ftrace.c(6272) ftrace_process_locs: [0.00] Oops - illegal instruction [#1] [0.00] Modules linked in: [0.00] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.11.0-1015-generic

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1934548] Re: RISC-V: Illegal instruction

2021-08-09 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
I am failing to reliably reproduce this issue. At first I have experienced this too. When I tried to bisect it and install multiple kernel abis they are all booting fine. So I was able to fail booting 1014 1015 1016 abis. And then they started to boot fine. I wonder if there is some

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1934548] Re: RISC-V: Illegal instruction

2021-08-06 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Package changed: ubuntu => linux-riscv-5.11 (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-riscv in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934548 Title: RISC-V: Illegal instruction Status in linux-riscv package in

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1939142] [NEW] linux-riscv-5.11 1015 panics on unmatched

2021-08-06 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Public bug reported: linux-riscv-5.11 1015 panics on unmatched [0.00] SBI specification v0.2 detected [0.00] SBI implementation ID=0x1 Version=0x9 [0.00] SBI v0.2 TIME extension detected [0.00] SBI v0.2 IPI extension detected [0.00] SBI v0.2 RFENCE

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1905807] Re: insecure W+X mapping

2021-08-06 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
insecure W+X mapping is fixed in v5.13 series and in impish. the changes to fix those will not be backported to hirsute, hence marking this bug as fix released. The kernel panics that is shown in the pastebin is unrelated to the insecure W+X mapping. ** Changed in: linux-riscv (Ubuntu)

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1932029] Re: Support builtin revoked certificates

2021-08-05 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Description changed: [Impact] Upstream linux kernel now supports configuring built-in revoked certificates for the .blacklist keyring. Add support in our kernel configuration to have built-in revoked certificates. Revoke UEFI amd64 & arm64 2012 signing certificate.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1938886] Re: rrr:no dh_strip or strip loose setuid bit

2021-08-04 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Patch removed: "chmod-reference.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1938886/+attachment/5515876/+files/chmod-reference.patch ** Patch added: "chmod-reference.patch"

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1938886] Re: rrr:no dh_strip or strip loose setuid bit

2021-08-04 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Patch added: "chmod-reference.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1938886/+attachment/5515876/+files/chmod-reference.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1938886] Re: rrr:no dh_strip or strip loose setuid bit

2021-08-04 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: dash (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: debugedit (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1938886] Re: rrr:no dh_strip or strip loose setuid bit

2021-08-04 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Based on https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/fs/inode.c#L1928 it seems that setuid and capabilities will be stipped, thus currently our implementation of dh_strip causes to loose setuid and capabilities. No idea why this is working with fakeroot when Rules-Requires-Root is set to

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1938886] Re: rrr:no dh_strip or strip loose setuid bit

2021-08-04 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
separately I'm not sure who/what/why stips setuid bits on file creation through redirect. is it like some kind of a CVE in bash/dash? kernel protection? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1938886] Re: rrr:no dh_strip or strip loose setuid bit

2021-08-04 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
- objcopy/strip changed in 2.36.1, not keeping file attributes of the original file. Work around that in dh_strip to write to a temporary file and cat'ing this to the original file to keep the original attributes. which is broken for setuid files. ** Also affects: dash (Ubuntu)

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1928679] Re: Support importing mokx keys into revocation list from the mok table

2021-08-04 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Xenial)

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1932029] Re: Support builtin revoked certificates

2021-08-04 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Focal)

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1932165] Re: lttng-modules/2.12.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-28 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
lttng-modules 2.12.5-1ubuntu2~21.04.1 in hirsute-proposed unapproved queue -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-hwe-5.11 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932165 Title: lttng-modules/2.12.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.2

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1936255] Re: New upstream release 2021.07.14

2021-07-27 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
$ dpkg-query -W wireless-regdb wireless-regdb 2021.07.14-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 $ sudo iw reg set 00 $ sudo iw reg get global country 00: DFS-UNSET (2402 - 2472 @ 40), (N/A, 20), (N/A) (2457 - 2482 @ 20), (N/A, 20), (N/A), AUTO-BW, PASSIVE-SCAN (2474 - 2494 @ 20), (N/A, 20),

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1936255] Re: New upstream release 2021.07.14

2021-07-27 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
It's pure datafiles arch:all package without any runtime deps, thus it is safe to copy to -security as is. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to wireless-regdb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1936255 Title: New

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1936255] Re: New upstream release 2021.07.14

2021-07-27 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
I wonder if we should really just do binary copies of it, just like we do with shim. If we set it to be compressed with xz. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to wireless-regdb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1936255

Re: [Kernel-packages] [Bug 1923162] Re: riscv64 images fail to boot in qemu

2021-07-27 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On Tue, 27 Jul 2021, 05:45 Brian Murray, <1923...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I'm sorry to be a bother here but I don't understand how u-boot failed > verification for hirsute but passed for focal when what are presumably > the same patches exist in both versions of the package. How could this >

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1932160] Re: broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271-12 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: broadcom-sta (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: Tim Gardner (timg-tpi) => Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-hwe-5.11 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932160 Ti

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1932165] Re: lttng-modules/2.12.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: lttng-modules (Ubuntu Focal) Milestone: None => ubuntu-20.04.3 ** Changed in: lttng-modules (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: lttng-modules (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) -- You received

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1932159] Re: bcmwl/6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7~20.04.2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: Tim Gardner (timg-tpi) => Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to bcmwl in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932159 Title: bcmwl/6.30.223.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1932169] Re: rtl8812au/4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu13~20.04.2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: rtl8812au (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: Tim Gardner (timg-tpi) => Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-hwe-5.11 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932169 Ti

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1932173] Re: xtables-addons/3.9-1ubuntu0.2~20.04.1 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: xtables-addons (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: Tim Gardner (timg-tpi) => Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-hwe-5.11 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932173 Ti

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1932159] Re: bcmwl/6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7~20.04.2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu Focal) Milestone: None => ubuntu-20.04.3 ** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to bcmwl in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1932160] Re: broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271-12 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: broadcom-sta (Ubuntu Focal) Milestone: None => ubuntu-20.04.3 ** Changed in: broadcom-sta (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-hwe-5.11 in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1932169] Re: rtl8812au/4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu13~20.04.2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: rtl8812au (Ubuntu Focal) Milestone: None => ubuntu-20.04.3 ** Changed in: rtl8812au (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-hwe-5.11 in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1932173] Re: xtables-addons/3.9-1ubuntu0.2~20.04.1 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: xtables-addons (Ubuntu Focal) Milestone: None => ubuntu-20.04.3 ** Changed in: xtables-addons (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Medium => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-hwe-5.11 in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1932163] Re: evdi/1.7.0+dfsg-1ubuntu1~20.04.3 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-22 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
1.9.1-1ubuntu4~21.04.1 supersedes 1.9.1-1ubuntu3~21.04.1 to fix adt failure on s390x. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-hwe-5.11 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932163 Title:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1932165] Re: lttng-modules/2.12.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-21 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Please provide SRU paperwork as per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#SRU_Bug_Template -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-hwe-5.11 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932165 Title:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1932165] Re: lttng-modules/2.12.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-21 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Attachment added: "lttng-modules_2.12.5-1ubuntu1~20.04.2_source.changes" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lttng-modules/+bug/1932165/+attachment/5512591/+files/lttng-modules_2.12.5-1ubuntu1~20.04.2_source.changes -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1932165] Re: lttng-modules/2.12.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-21 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Patch added: "corrected.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lttng-modules/+bug/1932165/+attachment/5512590/+files/corrected.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-hwe-5.11 in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1932163] Re: evdi/1.7.0+dfsg-1ubuntu1~20.04.3 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-21 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Sponsored evdi_1.9.1-1ubuntu4_source.changes to impish. ** Changed in: evdi (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed ** Changed in: evdi (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo (cascardo) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: linux-hwe-5.11 (Ubuntu) Status:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1932163] Re: evdi/1.7.0+dfsg-1ubuntu1~20.04.3 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-21 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
evdi debdiff is good, but it must go into other series too. https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/evdi Looks like that change is needed in impish, hirsute and focal. One cannot introduce brand new change in a focal SRU with a version number higher than all future series. ** Changed in: evdi

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1932165] Re: lttng-modules/2.12.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-21 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Changelog entries in the #3 debdiff are in the wrong order. The 2.12.2-1ubuntu1~20.04* entreis should be just above the other 2.12.2 entries. Such that when build is done with -v2.12.5-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 all changelog entries since 2.12.2 are included, i.e. all the v2.12.5 from impish and etc.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1923162] Re: riscv64 images fail to boot in qemu

2021-07-20 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Impish is not affected, as it still skips fdtdir under qemu completely. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-riscv in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923162 Title: riscv64 images fail to boot in qemu Status

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1923162] Re: riscv64 images fail to boot in qemu

2021-07-20 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Oh https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot/2021.01+dfsg-3ubuntu9.1 is an orphan, as it did not make it into impish. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-riscv in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923162 Title:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1923162] Re: riscv64 images fail to boot in qemu

2021-07-20 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
$ dpkg-query -W u-boot-qemu u-boot-qemu 2021.01+dfsg-3ubuntu9.1 $ qemu-system-riscv64 -machine virt -nographic -m 2048 -smp 4 -bios /usr/lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/opensbi/generic/fw_jump.elf -kernel /usr/lib/u-boot/qemu-riscv64_smode/uboot.elf -device virtio-net- device,netdev=eth0 -netdev

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1923162] Re: riscv64 images fail to boot in qemu

2021-07-20 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Trying to see if impish u-boot is also broken at the moment. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-riscv in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923162 Title: riscv64 images fail to boot in qemu Status in

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1936344] [NEW] dkms autopkgtest needs to be smarter

2021-07-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Public bug reported: Over at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backport-iwlwifi- dkms/+bug/1932158 you can observe that it was chosen to skip the dkms module for a given kernel, and dkms-autopkgtest did not manage to handle it well. ** Affects: dkms (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1912811] Re: Update dwarves-dfsg in focal to version 1.21 from hirsute

2021-07-14 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Description changed: [Impact] BTF is an extremely useful tool for BPF developers. Enabling BTF support - in the kernel requires pahole 1.16 or later, but in focal we have only - 1.15. The simplest path for us to get a sufficiently updated version of - pahole is to backport dwarves-dfsg

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1923162] Re: riscv64 images fail to boot in qemu

2021-07-13 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
@jawn-smith https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/hjqFz46frm/ is what i'm sponsoring, after fix ups. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-riscv in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923162 Title: riscv64 images fail to boot

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1923162] Re: riscv64 images fail to boot in qemu

2021-07-13 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
re: u-boot-menu backport, imho the debian/changelog should be merged and focal entries should not be lost. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-riscv in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923162 Title: riscv64

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1923162] Re: riscv64 images fail to boot in qemu

2021-07-13 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Re: u-boot-menu backport, imho debian/changelog should have documented that debhelper-compat version is lowered from 13 to 12, to make it build on focal. But also it is self-explanatory (i did try to get debhelper 13 into focal before it released, but that upload got rejected). Otherwise no

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >