From: Michal Suchanek
[ Upstream commit 0828c4a39be57768b8788e8cbd0d84683ea757e5 ]
commit e23a8020ce4e ("s390/kexec_file: Signature verification prototype")
adds support for KEXEC_SIG verification with keys from platform keyring
but the built-in keys and secondary keyring are not used.
Add supp
From: Michal Suchanek
[ Upstream commit 0828c4a39be57768b8788e8cbd0d84683ea757e5 ]
commit e23a8020ce4e ("s390/kexec_file: Signature verification prototype")
adds support for KEXEC_SIG verification with keys from platform keyring
but the built-in keys and secondary keyring are not used.
Add supp
From: Michal Suchanek
[ Upstream commit 0828c4a39be57768b8788e8cbd0d84683ea757e5 ]
commit e23a8020ce4e ("s390/kexec_file: Signature verification prototype")
adds support for KEXEC_SIG verification with keys from platform keyring
but the built-in keys and secondary keyring are not used.
Add supp
On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 12:37:46PM -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> Let me clarify / ask something: this series, for example, is composed as
> a bunch of patches "centered" around the same idea, panic notifiers
> improvements/fixes. But its patches belong to completely different
> subsystems, l
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 12:55 PM Guilherme G. Piccoli
wrote:
>
> Currently the gsmi driver registers a panic notifier as well as
> reboot and die notifiers. The callbacks registered are called in
> atomic and very limited context - for instance, panic disables
> preemption and local IRQs, also all
On 09/08/2022 16:08, Johannes Berg wrote:
> [...]
>> Perfect, thank you! Let me take the opportunity to ask you something I'm
>> asking all the maintainers involved here - do you prefer taking the
>> patch through your tree, or to get it landed with the whole series, at
>> once, from some maintaine
On Tue, 2022-08-09 at 16:03 -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> On 09/08/2022 15:09, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > V2:
> > > > - Kept the notifier header to avoid implicit usage - thanks
> > > > Johannes for the suggestion!
> > > >
> > > > arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c | 7 +++
> >
On 09/08/2022 15:09, Johannes Berg wrote:
> [...]
>>> V2:
>>> - Kept the notifier header to avoid implicit usage - thanks
>>> Johannes for the suggestion!
>>>
>>> arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c | 7 +++
>>> arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c| 8
>>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8
On 08/08/2022 12:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Ard / Greg, do you think you could get this patch through your -next (or
>> -fixes) trees? Not sure which tree is the most common for picking GSMI
>> stuff.
>
> Picking out an individual patch from a series with as many responses and
> t
On Sun, 2022-08-07 at 12:40 -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> On 19/07/2022 16:53, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> > Currently the panic notifiers from user mode linux don't follow
> > the convention for most of the other notifiers present in the
> > kernel (indentation, priority setting, numeric
On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 12:14:30PM -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> On 08/08/2022 02:07, Evan Green wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 12:55 PM Guilherme G. Piccoli
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Currently the gsmi driver registers a panic notifier as well as
> >> reboot and die notifiers. The callbacks
On 08/08/2022 02:07, Evan Green wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 12:55 PM Guilherme G. Piccoli
> wrote:
>>
>> Currently the gsmi driver registers a panic notifier as well as
>> reboot and die notifiers. The callbacks registered are called in
>> atomic and very limited context - for instance, panic
On 19/07/2022 16:53, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> The altera_edac panic notifier performs some data collection with
> regards errors detected; such code relies in the regmap layer to
> perform reads/writes, so the code is abstracted and there is some
> risk level to execute that, since the panic p
On 19/07/2022 16:53, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> Currently the tracing dump_on_oops feature is implemented
> through separate notifiers, one for die/oops and the other
> for panic - given they have the same functionality, let's
> unify them.
>
> Also improve the function comment and change the p
On 19/07/2022 16:53, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> Currently the panic notifiers from user mode linux don't follow
> the convention for most of the other notifiers present in the
> kernel (indentation, priority setting, numeric return).
> More important, the priorities could be improved, since it's
On 19/07/2022 16:53, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> Currently the gsmi driver registers a panic notifier as well as
> reboot and die notifiers. The callbacks registered are called in
> atomic and very limited context - for instance, panic disables
> preemption and local IRQs, also all secondary CPUs
On 19/07/2022 16:53, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> Currently the regular CPU shutdown path for ARM disables IRQs/FIQs
> in the secondary CPUs - smp_send_stop() calls ipi_cpu_stop(), which
> is responsible for that. IRQs are architecturally masked when we
> take an interrupt, but FIQs are high prior
On 8/15/22 02:48, Coiby Xu wrote:
I can confirm this patch set fixes an issue that guest kdump kernel
crashes on POWER9 host by applying it to 5.19.1 (there is a conflict
when applying this patch set to latest kernel i.e. 6.0.0-rc1)
I rebased it. 2 of the borrowed patches disappeared now sin
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature
to the 5.19-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature
to the 5.18-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature
to the 5.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature
to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature
to the 5.15-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
kexec, KEYS, s390: Make use of built-in and secondary keyring for signature
verification
to the 5.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
24 matches
Mail list logo
