Hi Adam,
I'm now on a Ubuntu 14.04 daily. Just tell me what to test exactly and
how... But there is chance I'll build Kicad today so dependencies may be
installed on this machine today.
Also: wx3.0 is available in the official repositories now (I use synaptic)
2014-10-18 15:20 GMT+02:00 Adam
Yeah, wxwidgets is available, but not wxpython.
2014-10-20 14:32 GMT+02:00 Benoît Roehr benoit.roehr...@gmail.com:
Hi Adam,
I'm now on a Ubuntu 14.04 daily. Just tell me what to test exactly and
how... But there is chance I'll build Kicad today so dependencies may be
installed on this
I feel like we wouldn't use the last digit much in a triplet number
because, IIRC, backporting of fixes is not planned. That being said, I
would also begin with at least 2.1, as Cirilo said.
However, I personally vote for numbering the versions a la MATLAB.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Nick
I had compiled wxWidgets 3.0.2 on my Mavericks OS and kicad seemed to
work OK last week.
Yesterday I upgraded my build system to Yosemite - this required several
iterations of brew update, brew upgrade, brew doctor, then new Xcode and
new Command line tools. A reboot somewhere in the middle
KiCad carries every library it depends on in the bundle (in contrast to
e.g., linux).
So, as long as the system libraries (not contained in the bundle) don't
break anything badly/incompatible, a version compiled on Mavericks or
any other OSX should work just fine. I guess breaking something
On Oct 19, 2014, at 4:58 PM, Ian Woloschin i...@woloschin.com wrote:
From a not-really-developer point of view, I do want to at least recommend
the user of year-based release schemes, similar to how Ubuntu or MATLAB, as
opposed to the more traditional triplet style numbering schemes.
Hi Jean-Samuel,
What do you mean fighting to have the ppa come back.
If you use the KiCad Trusty Backports PPA I created this weekend, it
contains python-wxgtk3.0-dev.
Adam Wolf
Cofounder and Engineer
WL, LLC
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Jean-Samuel Reynaud js.reyn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
Hi All,
I'm currently fighting to have the ppa come back... As I see there is a
dependence missing in the script kicad-install.sh:
= python-wxgtk3.0-dev is needed too when I use ppa from Adam.
Regards,
Le 20/10/2014 14:35, Nick Østergaard a écrit :
Yeah, wxwidgets is available, but not
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 04:19:06PM +0200, Bernhard Stegmaier wrote:
KiCad carries every library it depends on in the bundle (in contrast to
e.g., linux).
[...]
Since there are so few linux distros with the brand new python-wxgtk3.0
installed, not even last Ubuntu LTS (so no-go for two years at
Patch committed in product branch r5207. I added a missing exit if the
package install fails and I also changed the rpm install code to match
the changes made to the deb package install. Thank you for your
contribution to kicad.
Kind Regards,
Wayne
On 10/14/2014 8:57 PM, Joseph Chen wrote:
We have it in a PPA.
https://launchpad.net/~adamwolf/+archive/ubuntu/kicad-trusty-backports
2014-10-20 16:38 GMT+02:00 Marco Ciampa ciam...@libero.it:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 04:19:06PM +0200, Bernhard Stegmaier wrote:
KiCad carries every library it depends on in the bundle (in contrast to
As Nick says, I backported the utopic packages to trusty. Also, providing
Windows, Mac, and Linux easy-to-use binary packages is a high priority for
the KiCad team right now--we're working on it, I promise!
Adam Wolf
Cofounder and Engineer,
WL, LLC
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Nick
Hi folks,
Has anyone gotten KiCad to work with CLion? It's a new C++ IDE by the
Jetbrains folks.
I spent a few minutes this weekend, but I couldn't get it to find some
libraries.
Adam Wolf
Cofounder and Engineer
WL
___
Mailing list:
Hi Adam,
Of course I use your PPA you have created. Thank you a lot...
About fighting it was just a joke to explain I'm currently doing some
work to have back the ppa with up to date kicad...
Anyway, this dependency is missing in kicad-install.sh as I see on last
revision of this file.
Regards
2014-10-20 16:54 GMT+02:00 Jean-Samuel Reynaud js.reyn...@gmail.com:
Hi Adam,
Of course I use your PPA you have created. Thank you a lot...
About fighting it was just a joke to explain I'm currently doing some work
to have back the ppa with up to date kicad...
Anyway, this dependency is
Hi Nick,
Currently kicad-install.sh script does not have python-wxgtk3.0-dev in
prerequisite_list.
This packages is needed to be able to compile. Please find attached a
small to patch for that...
Regarding your question I don't know if kicad-install.sh should add the PPA.
Le 20/10/2014 16:56,
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 05:07:05PM +0200, Jean-Samuel Reynaud wrote:
Hi Nick,
Currently kicad-install.sh script does not have python-wxgtk3.0-dev in
prerequisite_list.
This packages is needed to be able to compile. Please find attached a
small to patch for that...
Regarding your question
We all owe Adam a great deal of thanks for taking on this task. This
should save our users a lot of grief by eliminating the need to build
kicad from source. It should also save the developers a lot of time
trying to help users build kicad from source.
Wayne
On 10/20/2014 10:41 AM, Adam Wolf
Thanks Jean-Samuel. Now I understand!
Adam Wolf
Cofounder and Engineer
WL
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Jean-Samuel Reynaud js.reyn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Nick,
Currently kicad-install.sh script does not have python-wxgtk3.0-dev in
prerequisite_list.
This packages is needed to be able
On 10/20/2014 10:56 AM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
2014-10-20 16:54 GMT+02:00 Jean-Samuel Reynaud js.reyn...@gmail.com:
Hi Adam,
Of course I use your PPA you have created. Thank you a lot...
About fighting it was just a joke to explain I'm currently doing some work
to have back the ppa with up
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 08:47:54AM -0400, Carl Poirier wrote:
I feel like we wouldn't use the last digit much in a triplet number
because, IIRC, backporting of fixes is not planned. That being said, I
would also begin with at least 2.1, as Cirilo said.
However, I personally vote for numbering
On 20.10.2014 17:25, Marco Ciampa wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 08:47:54AM -0400, Carl Poirier wrote:
I feel like we wouldn't use the last digit much in a triplet number
because, IIRC, backporting of fixes is not planned. That being said, I
would also begin with at least 2.1, as Cirilo said.
I'm going to comment on everything posted thus far. I don't have time
to reply on each individual comment. I will say that I am not terribly
thrilled with date style version. I'm not absolutely sure if it causes
grief for package management systems such as apt-get or yum. I'm fine
with
Hi folks,
I do not think we should work on the build script anymore. If the build
script worked very, very, well, it still doesn't help the vast majority of
our users, and by having the build script, we implicitly sign up for
supporting every user that wants to use it.
Completely honestly, I
For the love of G-d, whatever you do, don't adopt that Altium Season
scheme ... Summer 2011 and what-not. Is Winter 2011 earlier or later
than Winter 2010? What hemisphere are you in? I'm perfectly fine with
the dotted-triplet thing, Major.minor.more-minor -a
Yes, and also these make you fell
Not a dev, but my 2 femto cents:
I really like the #major.#minor.#dev - #buildNo scheme, but I would add
these details about the version incrementation:
2.0
New release, majors changes over the 1.9.
2.1.0
Stable release with new features and bug fixes over 2.0.0.
2.1.25
Development version,
2014-10-20 18:07 GMT+02:00 Benoît Roehr benoit.roehr...@gmail.com:
Not a dev, but my 2 femto cents:
I really like the #major.#minor.#dev - #buildNo scheme, but I would add
these details about the version incrementation:
A lot of info in there, read on.
2.0
New release, majors changes over
On 10/20/2014 12:38 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
2014-10-20 18:07 GMT+02:00 Benoît Roehr benoit.roehr...@gmail.com:
Not a dev, but my 2 femto cents:
I really like the #major.#minor.#dev - #buildNo scheme, but I would add
these details about the version incrementation:
A lot of info in there,
On Oct 20, 2014, at 6:03 AM, Bob Gustafson bob...@rcn.com wrote:
I had compiled wxWidgets 3.0.2 on my Mavericks OS and kicad seemed to work OK
last week.
Yesterday I upgraded my build system to Yosemite - this required several
iterations of brew update, brew upgrade, brew doctor, then
I agree with all points here, with one exception and one caveat.
The exception is that it will not work well with git (not an issue here). Git
commit IDs are not ordered and trying to use them as versions is a world of
pain. You’ll just have to trust me on that.
The caveat is that if you’re
2014-10-20 19:00 GMT+02:00 Garth Corral gcor...@abode.com:
I agree with all points here, with one exception and one caveat.
The exception is that it will not work well with git (not an issue here).
Git commit IDs are not ordered and trying to use them as versions is a world
of pain.
On 20/10/2014 18:53, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
On 10/20/2014 12:38 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
2014-10-20 18:07 GMT+02:00 Benoît Roehr benoit.roehr...@gmail.com:
Not a dev, but my 2 femto cents:
I really like the #major.#minor.#dev - #buildNo scheme, but I would add
these details about the
On Oct 20, 2014, at 10:15 AM, Nick Østergaard oe.n...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-10-20 19:00 GMT+02:00 Garth Corral gcor...@abode.com:
I agree with all points here, with one exception and one caveat.
The exception is that it will not work well with git (not an issue here).
Git commit IDs are
On 10/20/2014 11:53 AM, Andy Peters wrote:
On Oct 20, 2014, at 6:03 AM, Bob Gustafson bob...@rcn.com wrote:
I had compiled wxWidgets 3.0.2 on my Mavericks OS and kicad seemed to work OK
last week.
Yesterday I upgraded my build system to Yosemite - this required several
iterations of brew
On 10/20/2014 11:43 AM, Adam Wolf wrote:
Hi folks,
I do not think we should work on the build script anymore. If the build
script worked very, very, well, it still doesn't help the vast majority
of our users, and by having the build script, we implicitly sign up for
supporting every user
Hi all,
While browsing recent commits I saw some updates to authors.txt which
prompted me to take a look at the file and noticed two minor issues.
1) maintener (line 15) should be spelled maintainer
2) Neither Cirillo Bernardo nor myself are listed as contributors.
Thanks :)
--
Andrew
36 matches
Mail list logo
