https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25603
Heather changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||heather_hernan...@nps.gov
--
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25603
--- Comment #10 from David Cook ---
(In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #8)
> Hm, using ExtractValue is slow, especially on big databases. As Magnus says
> in lot of use cases a quick access to 001 and 003 for matching is
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25603
--- Comment #9 from David Cook ---
(In reply to Magnus Enger from comment #6)
> (In reply to David Cook from comment #5)
> > But in any case... I think there's a difference between the Koha 001 and
> > 003... and the original 001
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25603
--- Comment #8 from Katrin Fischer ---
Hm, using ExtractValue is slow, especially on big databases. As Magnus says in
lot of use cases a quick access to 001 and 003 for matching is really helpful.
We have started to map the
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25603
Hans Pålsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hans.pals...@hkr.se
--
You
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25603
--- Comment #7 from Katrin Fischer ---
> > However, how likely is it for source MARC data to have the 001 and 003
> > properly filled out?
>
> In the case of Sweden and Norway: very. And I bet the Germans do it properly
> too?
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25603
--- Comment #6 from Magnus Enger ---
(In reply to David Cook from comment #5)
> But in any case... I think there's a difference between the Koha 001 and
> 003... and the original 001 and 003.
Could you expand on this? I thought
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25603
--- Comment #5 from David Cook ---
But in any case... I think there's a difference between the Koha 001 and 003...
and the original 001 and 003.
I think we abuse the 001 and 003 in Koha, and I'm not sure we should develop
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25603
--- Comment #4 from David Cook ---
I'm trying to think how we could do this in a more extensible way... and I
might have an idea.
MARC:
001 - Control Number
003 - Control Number Identifier
005 - Date and Time of Latest Transaction
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25603
--- Comment #3 from David Cook ---
(In reply to Magnus Enger from comment #0)
> Koha itself does not care too much about these fields, but sometimes they
> are used when importing/syncing in records from external sources, and then
>
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25603
David Cook changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dc...@prosentient.com.au
---
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25603
Andreas Jonsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
12 matches
Mail list logo
