KR> Hour meters

2009-06-01 Thread George Bearden
> a lot of old certified aircraft sitting on ramps and in hangers all over the country that only have 1500 Total Time Lots of old geezers too, maybe. Reminds me of 'Lou' bless his heart. Lou was a retired guy, was in Naval aircraft of some sort. Flew a lot. Was a navigator and pilot and I don't

KR> KR Gathering location, 2010

2009-06-01 Thread Scott
How about chino, ca? On Jun 1, 2009, at 11:04 PM, "Jeff Scott" wrote: > I have to say, I was really looking forward to a gathering in > Granada, MS and was disappointed when it was turned down. I like > the idea of doing Mt Vernon every other year, or maybe I should

KR> I Need Some Advice From Flying KR'ers

2009-06-01 Thread Ed Janssen
Ed Janssen wrote: > Briefly, according to FAA regulations - If you build at least 51% of a > KR2S > per plans you may apply for certification as an E-AB (Experimental-Amateur > Built)... I knew all that stuff Ed, but you were good to mention it because Dwight probably didn't. But what I was

KR> Re: Highest time KR

2009-06-01 Thread smwood
>...Off the top of my head, I can think that wood rot (such as can affect >the >Bellanca wing) would be something to watch long term. Corrosion of the >WAF's and/or attachment bolts another. I've heard of separations at the >firewall, but that must be a construction issue (wasn't built right to

KR> Ivoprop?

2009-06-01 Thread Darren Crompton
> > > Orma used to have a rant page about how the Ivo failed on his plane and how > badly he was treated by the company following the prop failure, but the web > page is now gone. > > I think this might be the page. http://kr-2.aviation-mechanics.com/AlertIVOProp.htm -- Darren Crompton

KR> 180 HP Modified Kr1

2009-06-01 Thread Larry Flesner
> What do you guys think and aerodynamically optimized Kr1 with the > new airfoil and a foot less wing on each side would do straight and > level with a 200 lb pilot... If it had a 180 HP v6 conversion > hanging off the front?

KR> KR Gathering location, 2010

2009-06-01 Thread Jeff Scott
I have to say, I was really looking forward to a gathering in Granada, MS and was disappointed when it was turned down. I like the idea of doing Mt Vernon every other year, or maybe I should say flying somewhere other than Mt vernon every second or third year. Larry and Chris do a great job

KR> KR Gathering location, 2010

2009-06-01 Thread Mark Langford
KRnetHeads, I've been thinking for a couple of years now that while Mount Vernon is a great place for the KR Gathering (there may be no better place), I miss going somewhere different. I wouldn never have gone to Red Oak Iowa, Pine Bluff Arkansas, Perry Oklahoma, Lake Barkley Kentucky,

KR> Tachs

2009-06-01 Thread laser...@juno.com
> Mechanical tachs in certified aircraft are often off 100-200 (usually low) RPM or more at the top end. I meant to say "100 RPM or more" at the top end. Mike You have a right to seek justice! Click here to find experienced lawyers

KR> Hour meters

2009-06-01 Thread laser...@juno.com
Sorry about the rant. I get these fits. Participants are doing much better at not re-posting than it used to be. Dan said, > "Then he sold it to Gene who put a new hour meter in it and it has accumulated 1850 hours from several tach/hour meters since then." There's an hour

KR> Highest time KR

2009-06-01 Thread Myron (Dan) Freeman
[quote] I will say that 1200+584=1784 which is pretty close to 1850 so that may be the answer that ties it all together especially if the "several tach/hour meters" were Tiny Tachs! Hi Mark; Well then I'm confusing it with Dan Diehl's statement and adding it twice then but that's still 1.46

KR> Archives

2009-06-01 Thread Mark Langford
Mike wrote: > When people do this, it creates all those repetitive entries you find > when you go looking in the archives. Takes up space, wastes time, is bad > netiquette, and is against the rules. Yet in the digest I get every > night there are those of you that keep on doing it. Why? Very

KR> Archives

2009-06-01 Thread laser...@juno.com
> If you're question was serious, you would look in the archives for an answer before posting. Which is one of several reasons why the rules explicitly ask us to NOT REPOST THE ENTIRE TEXT WE ARE REPLYING TO. When people do this, it creates all those repetitive entries you find when you go

KR> light sport vs. experimental

2009-06-01 Thread Dj Merrill
On 06/01/2009 12:11 PM, LG McCaw wrote: > The only question I've never really had a satisfactory answer > for is - IF I receive and E-AB certificate with stated limits falling > within the LSA category, (making it sport eligible) and later re-prop or > restate the max RPM or whatever, is it

KR> Highest time KR

2009-06-01 Thread Mark Langford
Dan Freeman wrote: > I'm going by what I was told. Dan Deihl had 1200+ hrs. in his pilot log > book > but not in the airframe log is the way I understand it because he didn't > have an hour meter in the plane. Then he sold it to Gene who put a new > hour > meter in it and it has accumulated

KR> light sport vs. experimental

2009-06-01 Thread Ron Butterfield
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 12:11 PM, LG McCaw wrote: The only question I've never really had a satisfactory answer for is - IF I receive and E-AB certificate with stated limits falling within the LSA category, (making it sport eligible) and later re-prop or restate the max RPM or

KR> Highest time KR

2009-06-01 Thread Myron (Dan) Freeman
[quote] Sorry Dan but this doesn't compute. If it had 1850 total time on the airframe at the last annual (which was in the last few months if I remember correctly)how to you figure adding the 1200 hours that it had on it when Dan sold it to Gene to get a new total time? Unless Gene put a new

KR> light sport vs. experimental

2009-06-01 Thread LG McCaw
I did some checking into this myself. The way I understand it, there are two classes of LSA. Those being S-LSA which are factory built LSA compliant airplanes. These are not "certified" planes, rather are build to accepted standards and are self-regulated by the manufacturer. The

KR> Re: Anybody flying today?

2009-06-01 Thread smwood
> > Anybody flying today?? I'm am:-) > > Dana Overall I just came back from flying around the airport (2W6) in a rented C-150. Definitely not a KR-2 but it does recharge my mental batteries for a little while. Now it is back to drilling holes in my KR-2 firewall for fuel, electrical, cables,

KR> Ivoprop?

2009-06-01 Thread Dj Merrill
On 06/01/2009 10:40 AM, Jeff Scott wrote: > You guys need to take advantage of the past writings in the KRNet archive on > this subject. The Ivo props have been tested on the VWs and found to be a > failure with a lousy company that won't stand behind them. Interesting. I'm on a Subaru

KR> Ivoprop?

2009-06-01 Thread Scott Perkins
Doesnt IvoProp specificly prohibit use of their props in direct drive 4 stroke applications ? Why even pursue it. Scott Jeff Scott wrote: > > You guys need to take advantage of the past writings in the KRNet archive on > this subject. The Ivo props have been tested on the VWs and found to be

KR> Ivoprop?

2009-06-01 Thread Jeff Scott
You guys need to take advantage of the past writings in the KRNet archive on this subject. The Ivo props have been tested on the VWs and found to be a failure with a lousy company that won't stand behind them. Orma Robbins is a long time A/IA/KR builder/pilot with a ton of experience. I

KR> Highest time KR

2009-06-01 Thread Myron (Dan) Freeman
Hi Guys and Girls; I dug out the log books of O'l Blue (N4DD), there are several of them. They are sometimes difficult to read so I transcribed them into a computer file. Bob Glidden and I settled on about 1850 hours total time on the airframe at the last annual. It has had several

KR> Ivoprop?

2009-06-01 Thread Jeff Wilder
I know there has been considerable conversations about the suitability of a 3 bladed Ivo prop on a VW. any verdict on a 4 or 2 blade? -Jeff

KR> I Need Some Advice From Flying KR'ers

2009-06-01 Thread Jeff Wilder
Dwight, I also live North of Denver, I have a project you would be more then welcome to come have a look at. Contact me off line if you would like to come have a look. Best Regards, Jeff W

KR> I Need Some Advice From Flying KR'ers

2009-06-01 Thread Ron Butterfield
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Mark Langford wrote: > But what I was fishing for is how those same questions are answered with > respect to LSA, > since that seems to be important to him. > There are many different flavors of LSA compared to Experimental-Amateur Built.

KR> light sport vs. experimental

2009-06-01 Thread Larry Flesner
At 01:09 AM 6/1/2009, you wrote: >There are some nuances about LSA pilots flying >Experimentals, so I'd think if you could license it as LSA to start with, >you might be ahead. >Mark Langford + If I'm not mistaken, and I might be, a

KR> I Need Some Advice From Flying KR'ers

2009-06-01 Thread Tim
, I better get my B into M - Original Message - From: "Robin Macdonald" Then you stand there & think I wonder how long before I can join them, I better get my A into G. Good luck

KR> I Need Some Advice From Flying KR'ers

2009-06-01 Thread Robin Macdonald
Dwight, Before you go down the track of what to build etc, you don't give your experience of flying. If the answer is none you have to ask is flying for me & can I get a certificate, go get a few flying lessons & get your medical, then if you decide to carry on, Get to the next "Gathering"

KR> I Need Some Advice From Flying KR'ers

2009-06-01 Thread Jack Cupp
I'm not a KR builder but have always really liked them. I do fly Sport Pilot and any airplane that meets the speed, weight etc you can fly as Sport Pilot. The best thing is to build an experimental that meets the requirements and that's all you need. I wouldn't bother with any type LSA

KR> I Need Some Advice From Flying KR'ers

2009-06-01 Thread Mark Langford
Ed Janssen wrote: > Briefly, according to FAA regulations - If you build at least 51% of a > KR2S > per plans you may apply for certification as an E-AB (Experimental-Amateur > Built)... I knew all that stuff Ed, but you were good to mention it because Dwight probably didn't. But what I was