KR> England photos

Beautiful!!! How long were you there Mark? Jeff Lange On 8/14/09, Glenn Martin wrote: > Mark Langford wrote: >> My "English experience" webpage is at >> http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford/andover/ >> >> > That is an AWESOME webpage. The photos of the countryside and

KR> England photos

Mark Langford wrote: > My "English experience" webpage is at > http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford/andover/ > > That is an AWESOME webpage. The photos of the countryside and architecture are almost as good as being there. Those thatched roofs are really something unique! And then the

KR> Re: registering and certifiying a homebuilt you did not build

If I'd bought an almost completed KR that didn't have an airworthiness certificate yet, I'd go through every sqaure millimeter of the plane and would thoroughly understand exactly how everything on it worked, and would adjust it all so that it operated as flawlessly as possible. Then I'd fix

KR> Re: registering and certifiying a homebuilt you did not build

On 08/14/2009 04:43 PM, Ed Janssen wrote: > I'm not sure about that. If the major part of the work was done before > being acquired by Dave, there could be a problem convincing the inspector > that he should be included as one of the original builders. Dave should > probably check with his

KR> Re: registering and certifiying a homebuilt you did not build

Dj, I'm not sure about that. If the major part of the work was done before being acquired by Dave, there could be a problem convincing the inspector that he should be included as one of the original builders. Dave should probably check with his local FSDO before proceeding. Different FSDOs

KR> Re: registering and certifiying a homebuilt you did not build

On 08/14/2009 12:42 PM, Ed Janssen wrote: > Dave, > > Currently the regulations say that if the purpose is to operate an > amateur-built aircraft, then the experimental certificate is issued to the > original builder, the person(s) who did the major portion of the work > (interpreted to be

KR> Re: registering and certifiying a homebuilt you did not build

Dave, Currently the regulations say that if the purpose is to operate an amateur-built aircraft, then the experimental certificate is issued to the original builder, the person(s) who did the major portion of the work (interpreted to be 51%). See FAR 21.191(g): Experimental certificates are

KR> RE: Goof off

Try kerosene with a cotton cloth, and use some good gloves. It has worked for me removing gum from duct tape and plastic residue. Joe Scappoose Ore.

KR> Re: KRnet Digest, Vol 351, Issue 234

On 08/14/2009 07:30 AM, paley anderson wrote: > That > being said , what are the chances of it aquiring it's certification > by me ( a non- building owner ) ? Will I be wasting time and money ? > Dave Anderson > Hi Dave, You should have no problem getting the airworthiness

KR> Re: KRnet Digest, Vol 351, Issue 234

At 06:30 AM 8/14/2009, you wrote: >I bought a KR-2 that never was issued an airworthyness >certificate, There is little documentation and about a dozen photos >on the construction of the aircraft, It's a sweet plane and you can >tell a lot of time and thought went into her construction. That

KR> Re: KRnet Digest, Vol 351, Issue 234

I bought a KR-2 that never was issued an airworthyness certificate, There is little documentation and about a dozen photos on the construction of the aircraft, It's a sweet plane and you can tell a lot of time and thought went into her construction. That being said , what are the