KR> AS504x airfoil

Mark L. has the prints on his website. I put them on a disk and took it to Kinkos and paid $10.00 to have them printed full scale. Pat Driscoll Saint Paul, MN patric...@usfamily.net LIFE MAY NOT BE THE PARTY WE HOPED FOR BUT WHILE WE ARE HERE WE MIGHT AS WELL DANCE!" ---

KR> AS504x airfoil

t> To: "KRnet" <kr...@mylist.net> Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 9:45 AM Subject: Re: KR> AS504x airfoil > Mark L. has the prints on his website. I put them on a disk and took it to > Kinkos and paid $10.00 to have them printed full scale. > Pat Driscoll > Sai

KR> AS504x airfoil

aerobeale wrote: > I'm currently building a KR2S and I'm about to put the vertical member in the fusalge that the main and rear spar go through. I tried to download the blue print for the AS504X wing how ever they were so small that I couldn't read off the paper. If you take it to somebody with

KR> AS504x airfoil

Jim wrote: Downloaded wing airfoils and took to Kinko's. Could not read them. Jim, try to put them on a disk and then open the disk on your computer. If you enlarge the picture on your computer and can read the print in any area, then the problem is with Kinko's. If you can't read them, you

KR> AS504x airfoil

" <n5...@hiwaay.net> To: "KRnet" <kr...@mylist.net> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 9:38 PM Subject: Re: KR> AS504x airfoil > aerobeale wrote: > >> I'm currently building a KR2S and I'm about to put the vertical member in > the fusalge that the

KR> AS504x airfoil

aerobeale wrote: > Thanks the diagonal pieces I m taking about are the 5/8 X 5/8 fore and aft > of the spar slots. Ive know the two on top load carring wouldnt be installed > untill spar compleation and installed the airfoil Im wanting to use is the > AS5048 That's what I was talking about when

KR> AS504x airfoil

> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 10:48 PM Subject: Re: KR> AS504x airfoil > Jim wrote: Downloaded wing airfoils and took to Kinko's. Could not read > them. > > Jim, > try to put them on a disk and then open the disk on your computer. If > you enlarge the picture o

KR> AS504x airfoil

Jim wrote: Thank you The computer is brand new however we have been having a few little gliches with it and this maybe one of them weve stumped Dell a couple of times. I know we must have some real problems because even my kids can get that to make a readable print . Sure

KR>AS504x airfoil

>Jim wrote: >Thank you The computer is brand new however we have been having a few >little gliches with it and this maybe one of them weve stumped Dell a couple >of times. >Hey Jim, >I had the same problem with the disc that I downloaded. The solution for me >was this:

KR> AS504x airfoil

I'm currently building a KR2S and I'm about to put the vertical member in the fusalge that the main and rear spar go through. I tried to download the blue print for the AS504X wing how ever they were so small that I couldn't read off the paper. Which airfoil has been used the most, and how high

KR> AS504x airfoil

Gene Leone wrote: > I'm building the KR-1. The 504x airfoil has been > discussed for the KR-2S. How compatible, I wonder, is this airfoil with the > KR-1? The AS504x certainly wasn't designed for the KR-1, but it can't be any worse match for it than the RAF48 is. I would expect the same

@SPAM+++++++++ Re: KR> AS504x airfoil

Thanks for the info'! I just wanted to be sure before building it. Gene Leone, Worland, Wyoming ---Original Message--- From: KRnet List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org Date: 04/19/04 16:55:10 To: KRnet Subject: @SPAM+ Re: KR> AS504x airfoil Gene Leone wrote: > I'm bu

KR> AS504x airfoil - ailerons

Someone said - (sorry i did not follow completely) OK for a wing root but will be a poor choice for a control surface. >Aileron control forces will be high. It is a less than optimum choice for >an airfoil that is intended to be laminar over a wide range angle of >attack. So is it tested and

KR> AS504x airfoil - ailerons

At 10:38 PM 4/12/2004, you wrote: >OK for a wing root but will be a poor choice for a control surface. > >Aileron control forces will be high. >So is it tested and understood that the farther out on the wing, the less of >this "cusp or tuck" the better, as far as on the aileron goes? Has this

KR> AS504x airfoil - ailerons- first user

>> Has this been proven on other airfoils? Would you fill in the tuck, >> keeping the cord the same? I recall a report on the first Netter to try the new wing section - he seemed pretty pleased after the first few flights - has anyone asked him lately with these specifics in mind? Steve J

KR> AS504x airfoil

>> I figured steve was talking through his neck - P51 wing section >> oh yeah - well I the P51 section is there and I did the >> comparrison he recommended - P51 against the AS 5046 - amazing similarity Hey Monkey - no upper case on your KB Was gonna comment on your great spelling

KR> AS504x airfoil

The many discussions about various airfoils and the Ashok ones, plus the recent discussion about the cusp, cause me to recommend highly to all list members, a book by Harry Riblett entitled GA AIRFOILS, A Catalog of Airfoils For General Aviation Use. It is available as part number 13-18725 from

KR> AS504x airfoil

You can also type in X/Y coordinates to modify a copy of an included airfoil. Just key over what's there to put in the coordinates for some airfoil not in Profili and it will render that airfoil. -Lloyd Schultz = Stephen Jacobs wrote: > >> I

KR> AS504x airfoil

? Because Janet Reno is her real father. ---Original Message--- From: KRnet List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org Date: 04/16/04 07:19:42 To: gle...@rtconnect.net Subject: @SPAM+ Re: KR> AS504x airfoil You can also type in X/Y coordinates to modify a copy of an included airfoil. J

KR> AS504x airfoil

Hello all - my first appearance The AS504x airfoil sections appear to be a big improvement over the RAF48. I am interested in the strange "tuck" underneath the trailing edge - the last few mm seem to droop down leaving a concave area right at the back (underneath). One builder site I visited

KR> AS504x airfoil

Ronald Metcalf wrote: > I am interested in the strange "tuck" underneath the trailing edge - the > last few mm seem to droop down leaving a concave area right at the back > (underneath). I'm not sure what the question is, but I can tell you that the Lionheart was originally designed using NACA

KR> AS504x airfoil

>Ronald Metcalf wrote: >>> I am interested in the strange "tuck" underneath the trailing edge - the >> last few mm seem to droop down leaving a concave area right at the back >> (underneath). +++ >I'm not sure what the question is, but I can tell you

KR> AS504x airfoil

> "Ronald Metcalf" writes: > The AS504x airfoil sections appear to be a big improvement > over the RAF48. > I am interested in the strange "tuck" underneath the trailing > edge - the last few mm seem to droop down leaving a > concave area right at the back (underneath).

KR> AS504x airfoil

At 09:57 PM 4/11/2004, you wrote: > > "Ronald Metcalf" writes: > > The AS504x airfoil sections appear to be a big improvement > > over the RAF48. > > I am interested in the strange "tuck" underneath the trailing > > edge - the last few mm seem to droop down leaving a > >

KR> AS504x airfoil

>That trailing edge cusp does several different things. the pitch moment >will be more negative >boundary layer separation will tend to stay closer to the trailing edge >coefficient of lift of the two different airfoils the same, but the >cusped airfoil will reach it >at lower angle of