KR> Jabiru 3300 engine mount drawing wanted
This is the reply I have been waiting for! Please give me a quote to manufature, as close to the fire wall as possible. I'll move the battery inside. The cg is foreward now with the 70 litre tank. Thanks Dene Subject: Re: KR> Jabiru 3300 engine mount drawing wanted I have the KR firewall template and acccess to a jabiru case for manufacturing the mount. Regards Dene Collett Avlec Projects cc Port Elizabeth South Africa
KR> Bye Bye 100LL/ Swift Fuel
Swift said they could produce their fuel for $2.00 a gallon once they good geared up for full production. That is about half what I am paying for 100LL. They couldn't tell me when they planned to go full blast. They did say they had sent two barrels to the FAA and they liked what they liked it. I guess we will just have to wait and see. I wouldn't hesitate to invest myself. --- On Mon, 2/8/10, Larry Flesnerwrote: From: Larry Flesner Subject: Re: KR> Bye Bye 100LL/ Swift Fuel To: "KRnet" List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org Date: Monday, February 8, 2010, 3:22 PM At 02:34 PM 2/8/2010, you wrote: >If I heard correctly, I believe the Swift fuel would cost about >$62.00 per gallon right now and that the quantiy that they have been >able to produce to this point is laughable (as in just a few >gallons) I think Swifts big goal right now is to sell shares of >stock to suckers !! > >Larry Howell +++ I listened to the interview and never heard anything about $62 a gallon. That might be what it's costing them for their "test" batches but they claim it should be comparable to 100LL when in full production. They also claim it will increase your horse power by allowing you to advance timing by 2 or 3 degrees. Personally, I hope they succeed. If they do, I don't expect to see it on the market for 3 to 5 years. Also, if I heard correctly, they have produced a 4000 gallon batch or two for running a test engine (a big one, 540ci or so) to TBO and check for wear. Larry Flesner ___ Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
KR> Bye Bye 100LL/ Swift Fuel
Dan, I took a look at the Swift Fuel web site. http://www.swiftenterprises.net/Swift%20Fuel.html Hey it all sounds Wonderful to me. I wish for them all the success they can achieve in their desired final product, who wouldn't? The information I gave in my earlier post was according to a fellow involved in the chemical industry who is involved with a alternative development group himself, maybe Swift for all I know. He sure is Very Aware of what is happening with the Swift Fuel people and their lack of capability to this point. I passed along his statements about them and what is going on with the development of alternative unleaded aircraft fuels, Not my thoughts. He was not hopeful at all that they were going to be successful. That is all I know about it. Also according to him I do not think they have been able to produce very many gallons to test to this point. I am fairly sure that the $62.00 per gallon figure is what he said it would cost for that fuel based on current mfg capability. According to him, Swift is planning to sell shares of stock. If he is a big liar, then I can't help it. I did use the term laughable because according to this fellow they have only produced a few gallons so far. IF he is wrong then what can I say? One more time, all of this is according to him, not me, so please do not accuse me, the messenger as being the Negative One. I have seen a lot of people come along in my adult life time with all kinds of Fantastic ideas that never panned out, we can just hope, right? Larry Howell From: Dan HeathTo: KRnet Sent: Mon, February 8, 2010 4:40:22 PM Subject: RE: KR> Bye Bye 100LL/ Swift Fuel I really thought that the KRNetters were better than this. Daniel R. Heath - Lexington, SC Why is it that there always has to be someone who finds it necessary to be negative even about something that could be so good? I don't get it.
KR> Bye Bye 100LL/ Swift Fuel
Why is it that there always has to be someone who finds it necessary to be negative even about something that could be so good? I don't get it. As for the stock, I asked them, and they are not selling stock. If they were, I would buy as much of it as I could afford. I really thought that the KRNetters were better than this. See N64KR at http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on the pics See you at the 2010 - KR Gathering in Richmond, Ky - I39 There is a time for building and a time for FLYING and the time for Flying has begun. Daniel R. Heath - Lexington, SC -Original Message- I believe the Swift fuel would cost about >> $62.00 per gallon right now and that the quantiy that they have been >> able to produce to this point is laughable (as in just a few >> gallons) I think Swifts big goal right now is to sell shares of >> stock to suckers !!
KR> Bye Bye 100LL/ Swift Fuel
Larry Howell, Are you by any chance related to Harley Howell in Colville, WA? Ron Piekaar On Feb 8, 2010, at 1:23 PM,wrote: > At 02:34 PM 2/8/2010, you wrote: >> If I heard correctly, I believe the Swift fuel would cost about >> $62.00 per gallon right now and that the quantiy that they have been >> able to produce to this point is laughable (as in just a few >> gallons) I think Swifts big goal right now is to sell shares of >> stock to suckers !! >> >> Larry Howell > +++ > > > I listened to the interview and never heard anything about $62 a > gallon. That might be what it's costing them for their "test" > batches but they claim it should be comparable to 100LL when in full > production. They also claim it will increase your horse power by > allowing you to advance timing by 2 or 3 degrees. Personally, I hope > they succeed. If they do, I don't expect to see it on the market for > 3 to 5 years. Also, if I heard correctly, they have produced a 4000 > gallon batch or two for running a test engine (a big one, 540ci or > so) to TBO and check for wear. > > Larry Flesner > > > ___ > Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html >
KR> Interesting flight
Seems appropriate given all the talk on auto fuel. It is not unusual for Australians to do this out back when needing fuel. Just taxi up to the bowser and walk across the road to the pub. John John Martindale 29 Jane Circuit Toormina NSW 2452 AUSTRALIA ph: 61 2 6658 4767 (H) mob: 0403 432179 email: john_martind...@bigpond.com -Original Message- From: krnet-bounces+john_martindale=bigpond@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-bounces+john_martindale=bigpond@mylist.net] On Behalf Of Mark Langford Sent: Monday, 8 February 2010 2:25 PM To: KRnet Subject: KR> Interesting flight NetHeads, .. I've always wondered if I could land on a road, and now I know I can. ...
KR> Bye Bye 100LL/ Swift Fuel
At 02:34 PM 2/8/2010, you wrote: >If I heard correctly, I believe the Swift fuel would cost about >$62.00 per gallon right now and that the quantiy that they have been >able to produce to this point is laughable (as in just a few >gallons) I think Swifts big goal right now is to sell shares of >stock to suckers !! > >Larry Howell +++ I listened to the interview and never heard anything about $62 a gallon. That might be what it's costing them for their "test" batches but they claim it should be comparable to 100LL when in full production. They also claim it will increase your horse power by allowing you to advance timing by 2 or 3 degrees. Personally, I hope they succeed. If they do, I don't expect to see it on the market for 3 to 5 years. Also, if I heard correctly, they have produced a 4000 gallon batch or two for running a test engine (a big one, 540ci or so) to TBO and check for wear. Larry Flesner
KR> Bye Bye 100LL/ Swift Fuel
Funny that this subject has come up. At our last local EAA Chapter meeting one of our members who is a chemical engineer spoke on the subject of alternative fuels. Looks like what might be coming our way will be fuel that causes at the least a 5% drop in horsepower for our engines. He is involved with a group attempting to develop an alternative aviation fuel. He said there are 10 refineries in our country that produce 100LL and that the total production is something like .02 percent of all fuel production. In other words producing 100LL or any aviation fuel might just be a thorn in the side of most of them, then again if they can make enough money producing it, maybe they are happy doing it. If I heard correctly, I believe the Swift fuel would cost about $62.00 per gallon right now and that the quantiy that they have been able to produce to this point is laughable (as in just a few gallons) I think Swifts big goal right now is to sell shares of stock to suckers !! Larry Howell Dan wrote: >>There is some really good news about a replacement for 100LL, at this site. >>The interview by AOPA, was very informative to me. >>http://swiftenterprises.net/ >>Daniel R. Heath Hey guys, I signed up with swift this summer at OSH with the hopes of being part of a test group. This has not materialized nor does it appear that they are even close to being able to produce at any kind of quantity. They do send an email up date about every 6 weeks or so. The last information that they sent me indicated that they were still trying to get a refinery to try to ramp up and even then the quantities would be limited. They also talked about the FAA certification process although I don't remember the details my impression was that it was better than a year away at the very best. They also mentioned at that time that the initial costs may be more than the current costs of 100LL supposedly until they got to full production -- again i read into that that the cost and availability will not make it very desirable for a number of years. But, hey I've been wrong before. I may have the emails saved somewhere. Joe Horton Coopersburg, Pa.
KR> Jabiru 3300 engine mount drawing wanted
Willie, If you ordered a motor from Len you should get a CD with it. On the CD is the manual for the motor and installation instructions. Amongst the information is the dimensions for the part of the mount that mates with the motor. Once you have those it should be a simple matter of calculating how long the mount should be, make up a dummy firewall and position the motor ahead of it at the correct distance. Make sure of the thrust line and start cutting up some 4130 tubing. If you do not have a competent welder available give me a call. I have a guy rated and approved by SAA to weld just about anything (4130, ally, inkaloy, titanium, stainless, etc) that makes up my mounts. I have the KR firewall template and acccess to a jabiru case for manufacturing the mount. Regards Dene Collett Avlec Projects cc Port Elizabeth South Africa - Original Message - From: "Willie van der Walt"To: "KRnet" Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 9:08 PM Subject: KR> Jabiru 3300 engine mount drawing wanted I ordered a Jabiru 120Hp and urgently need a drawing to manufacture an engine mounting for a standard KR2. Please help. Regards Willie ___ Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
KR> Interesting flight
On a road? - sure you could. :o) Reminds me of the time when my Piper Colt needed an annual and the little town (about 1000 pop.) that the A (an old cropduster from way back) lived in didn't have an airport. So he said "just land on the road there, north of town. I'll park my truck at the top of the hill to block any traffic that might come along". Huh?? Gee, I never did that before, I said - I wondered about the local police, but he said they "wouldn't care - just be careful taxiing over the railroad tracks". So, I gave it a shot - had to dodge a few tree branches overhanging the road as I taxied through downtown to the delight of a few gawkers, but no other problems. We did the annual, I taxied back through town and took off from the road, circled once, and headed home. Ed Janssen NetHeads, I hit 850 hours on the plane today flying down to Hickory Mississippi to visit Gene Knight and see his project. More on that later, but the interesting thing was that I've always wondered if I could land on a road, and now I know I can. See http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford/flights/10020711m.jpg for a more detailed look, and note that the Interstate is wider than the 16' wide runway! It was a great trip though, and now I have a lot more confidence about my ability to land on a road if I had to... Mark Langford
KR> Interesting flight
I also have never had to land on a road. But I think the width wouldn't be the issue. If you look in your picture notice those 2 very LARGE white things rolling along! Randy On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 21:24 -0600, Mark Langford wrote: > NetHeads, > > I hit 850 hours on the plane today flying down to Hickory Mississippi to > visit Gene Knight and see his project. More on that later, but the > interesting thing was that I've always wondered if I could land on a road, > and now I know I can. See > http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford/flights/10020711m.jpg for a more detailed > look, and note that the Interstate is wider than the 16' wide runway! It was > a great trip though, and now I have a lot more confidence about my ability to > land on a road if I had to... > > Mark Langford > N56ML "at" hiwaay.net > website at http://www.N56ML.com > > > ___ > Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
KR> kr2 model on ebay
The picture shown in this ad looks like Bill Capps KR Jack - Original Message - From: "Dann Johnson"To: kr...@mylist.net Sent: Monday, February 8, 2010 4:23:37 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: KR> kr2 model on ebay Maybe this is old news, but i stumbled a cross a mdodel a KR-2S ? Ebay item 120058142248 Copy on the ebay item read: RAND ROBINSON KR-2On June 1, 1974, the KR-2, a two seat version emerged into the world of experimental aviation with its maiden flight. The prototype KR-2, N4KR, was powered by an 1834cc Revmaster, which is an otherwise stock 1600cc VW with 99mm cylinders. This particular engine was a single ignition version and used a Bendix mag and a Posa carburetor. Revmaster gives the engine a continuous rating of 60 hp at 3000 rpms, which is on the conservative side. Ken Rand, the designer/builder, obtained cruise speeds of 180mph at 3200 rpm and airspeeds of 200mph at higher altitudes. KR-2 Specifications Dann ___ Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
KR> kr2 model on ebay
Maybe this is old news, but i stumbled a cross a mdodel a KR-2S ? Ebay item 120058142248 Copy on the ebay item read: RAND ROBINSON KR-2On June 1, 1974, the KR-2, a two seat version emerged into the world of experimental aviation with its maiden flight. The prototype KR-2, N4KR, was powered by an 1834cc Revmaster, which is an otherwise stock 1600cc VW with 99mm cylinders. This particular engine was a single ignition version and used a Bendix mag and a Posa carburetor. Revmaster gives the engine a continuous rating of 60 hp at 3000 rpms, which is on the conservative side. Ken Rand, the designer/builder, obtained cruise speeds of 180mph at 3200 rpm and airspeeds of 200mph at higher altitudes. KR-2 Specifications Dann
KR> magneto for Surabu
Kirk, I have no idea, but these guys could. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FlySoob/ It's a Yahoo group for people building aircraft with Subaru conversions. Cheers. Pete. Australia Kirk Lacewell wrote: > Has anyone replaced the distributor on a Subaru engine with a magneto system? > > Is such a conversion kit available? > > Thanks, > Kirk Lacewell