[kubernetes-users] Re: Proposal for a new SIG: SIG-GCP

A few days have elapsed, without any opposition. I'll get started with the setup process, and followup when it's open for business. - Adam On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 2:14 PM Adam Worrall wrote: > Thanks, Jaice ! > > I'll followup on Monday. Coincidentally, I'm off on vacation

[kubernetes-users] Re: Proposal for a new SIG: SIG-GCP

Thanks, Jaice ! I'll followup on Monday. Coincidentally, I'm off on vacation for ~2 weeks starting Tuesday, so there might be a brief hiatus in subsequent action. But hopefully I'll be able to leave knowing that SIG-GCP will indeed become a thing :) - Adam On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:03 PM

[kubernetes-users] Re: Proposal for a new SIG: SIG-GCP

Hi Michael, With no opposition, it seems that this has approval. For those curious on the process, these are the current guidelines : - Propose the new SIG publicly, including a brief mission

[kubernetes-users] Re: Proposal for a new SIG: SIG-GCP

Yes! please, proceed with the formal process. On Fri, Aug 11, 2017, 9:44 PM 'Michael Rubin' via Kubernetes developer/contributor discussion wrote: > Looks like we have enough belief this is useful. Is the next step to > just start forming the SIG? > > mrubin > >

[kubernetes-users] Re: Proposal for a new SIG: SIG-GCP

+1. On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 3:16:34 PM UTC-7, Adam Worrall wrote: > > I am proposing to create SIG-GCP. It would fill a similar role as SIG-AWS > and SIG-Azure, but for GCP. Here are the details: > > Proposed mission statement: > > A Special Interest Group for building, deploying,

[kubernetes-users] Re: Proposal for a new SIG: SIG-GCP

+1 On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 6:16:34 PM UTC-4, Adam Worrall wrote: > > I am proposing to create SIG-GCP. It would fill a similar role as SIG-AWS > and SIG-Azure, but for GCP. Here are the details: > > Proposed mission statement: > > A Special Interest Group for building, deploying,

[kubernetes-users] Re: Proposal for a new SIG: SIG-GCP

+1 在 2017年8月10日星期四 UTC+8上午6:16:35，Adam Worrall写道： > > I am proposing to create SIG-GCP. It would fill a similar role as SIG-AWS > and SIG-Azure, but for GCP. Here are the details: > > Proposed mission statement: > > A Special Interest Group for building, deploying, maintaining, supporting, >

[kubernetes-users] Re: Proposal for a new SIG: SIG-GCP

+1. On Aug 10, 2017 1:47 AM, "'David Oppenheimer' via Kubernetes developer/contributor discussion" wrote: > +1 > > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Christoph Blecker > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On 9 August 2017 at 15:16, 'Adam Worrall' via

[kubernetes-users] Re: Proposal for a new SIG: SIG-GCP

+1 On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Christoph Blecker wrote: > +1 > > On 9 August 2017 at 15:16, 'Adam Worrall' via Kubernetes > developer/contributor discussion wrote: > >> I am proposing to create SIG-GCP. It would fill a similar role as

[kubernetes-users] Re: Proposal for a new SIG: SIG-GCP

+1 On 9 August 2017 at 15:16, 'Adam Worrall' via Kubernetes developer/contributor discussion wrote: > I am proposing to create SIG-GCP. It would fill a similar role as SIG-AWS > and SIG-Azure, but for GCP. Here are the details: > > Proposed mission statement: >

[kubernetes-users] Re: Proposal for a new SIG: SIG-GCP

+1 - there's a lot of good topics that are spread out to other sigs today which could benefit from being collected together in a consistent discussion thread. On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 6:16 PM, 'Adam Worrall' via Kubernetes developer/contributor discussion wrote: >