On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Juan Quintela quint...@redhat.com wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
0.15.0 release candidate testing
* http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/0.15/Testing
* Please test hosts, targets, subsystems, or features you care about!
* May
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
qemu_malloc() is type-unsafe as it returns a void pointer. Introduce
QEMU_NEW() (and QEMU_NEWZ()), which return the correct type.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com
---
This is part of my memory API patchset, but
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Zhi Yong Wu zwu.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Zhi Yong Wu wu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
+ elapsed_time = (real_time - bs-slice_start[is_write
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 6:05 AM, Prateek Sharma prate...@cse.iitb.ac.in wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any equivalent of qemu's virtagent in qemu-kvm?
[http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-01/msg02149.html] .
In particular , i want to share pages between KVM guests and the host . Is
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:25 AM, Zhi Yong Wu zwu.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Zhi Yong Wu wu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
+static void bdrv_block_timer(void *opaque
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Zhi Yong Wu wu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
+static void bdrv_block_timer(void *opaque)
+{
+ BlockDriverState *bs = opaque;
+ BlockQueue *queue = bs-block_queue;
+ uint64_t intval = 1;
+
+ while (!QTAILQ_EMPTY(queue-requests)) {
+
so these tracepoints can also be self-describing.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c |6 --
arch/x86/kvm/trace.h | 12
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
=0xc01151a8 isa=1 info1=4272 info2=0
I'd really like to make perf and trace-cmd just work with kvm:kvm_exit. Any
suggestions other than improving the parsers in the respective tools?
Stefan Hajnoczi (2):
KVM: Record instruction set in all vmexit tracepoints
KVM: Use __print_symbolic
table with __print_symbolic() depending on the
instruction set. Note that __print_symbolic() is designed for exporting
the formatting table to userspace and allows trace-cmd and perf to work.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |2
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/14/2011 10:14 AM, Umesh Deshpande wrote:
@@ -260,10 +260,15 @@ int ram_save_live(Monitor *mon, QEMUFile *f, int
stage, void *opaque)
return 0;
}
+ if (stage != 3)
+ qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Hannes Reinecke h...@suse.de wrote:
Hi all,
these are some fixes I found during debugging my megasas HBA emulation.
This time I've sent them as a separate patchset for inclusion.
All of them have been acked, so please apply.
Are SCSI patches going through
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:37:08PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:39:06PM +0300, Dor Laor wrote:
On 07/05/2011 03:58
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Kaushal Shriyan
kaushalshri...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to resize the Hard Disk of VM ?
You can use qemu-img resize on a disk image that is currently not in use:
qemu-img resize filename +10G
Or you can use libguestfs to get a parted-style resize:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:28 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues l...@redhat.com
wrote:
On an effort to make KVM autotest better and more useful for our target
users (KVM developers), we are expanding documentation and writing
articles on how to get some commonly asked test jobs running (I plan on
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org
wrote:
On 4 July 2011 23:00, Raghavendra D Prabhu raghu.prabh...@gmail.com wrote:
This is to avoid gcc optimizating out the comparison in assert
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Dor Laor dl...@redhat.com wrote:
I tried to re-arrange all of the requirements and use cases using this wiki
page: http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/LiveBlockMigration
It would be the best to agree upon the most interesting use cases (while we
make sure we cover
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Hannes Reinecke h...@suse.de wrote:
+static void megasas_unmap_sgl(struct megasas_cmd_t *cmd)
+{
+ uint16_t flags = le16_to_cpu(cmd-frame-header.flags);
+ int i, is_write = (flags MFI_FRAME_DIR_WRITE) ? 1 : 0;
+
+ for (i = 0; i
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:39:06PM +0300, Dor Laor wrote:
On 07/05/2011 03:58 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 01:40:08PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Dor Laordl
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Raghavendra D Prabhu
raghu.prabh...@gmail.com wrote:
* On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:38:30PM +0100, Peter Maydell
peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 4 July 2011 23:00, Raghavendra D Prabhu raghu.prabh...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is to avoid gcc optimizating out the
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Hai Dong,Li haido...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
So if I understand correctly, virtio-scsi looks like an SCSI tranport
protocol,
such as iSCSI, FCP and SRP which use tcp/ip, FC and Infiniband RDMA
respectively as the transfer media while virtio-scsi uses virtio,
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 4 July 2011 23:00, Raghavendra D Prabhu raghu.prabh...@gmail.com wrote:
This is to avoid gcc optimizating out the comparison in assert,
due to assumption of signed overflow being undefined by default
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Hannes Reinecke h...@suse.de wrote:
+static void megasas_mmio_writel(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr,
+ uint32_t val)
+{
+ MPTState *s = opaque;
+ target_phys_addr_t frame_addr;
+ uint32_t frame_count;
+ int i;
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Asias He asias.he...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/30/2011 04:56 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Asias He asias.he...@gmail.com wrote:
uip stands for user mode {TCP,UDP}/IP. Currently, uip supports ARP, ICMP,
IPV4, UDP, TCP. So any network
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Asias He asias.he...@gmail.com wrote:
uip stands for user mode {TCP,UDP}/IP. Currently, uip supports ARP, ICMP,
IPV4, UDP, TCP. So any network protocols above UDP/TCP should work as well,
e.g., HTTP, FTP, SSH, DNS.
There is an existing uIP which might cause
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:08:23AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
In the future we could add a 'base' argument to block_stream. If base
is specified then data contained in the base image will not be copied
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:08:23AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
This can be used to merge data from an intermediate image without
merging the base image. When streaming completes the backing file
will be set
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/14/2011 10:39 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
If, however, we decide to expose some details about the backend, we
could be using the values from the backend directly.
EG we could be forwarding the SCSI target port
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Am 28.06.2011 21:41, schrieb Marcelo Tosatti:
stream
--
1) base - remote
2) base - remote - local
3) base - local
local image is always valid. Requires backing file support.
With the above, this restriction wouldn't
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Juan Quintela quint...@redhat.com wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Live block copy and image streaming:
* The differences between Marcelo and Kevin's approaches
* Which approach to choose and who can help implement it
--
To
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 02:38:15PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Juan Quintela quint...@redhat.com wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Live block
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 08:36:26PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
Any comments on this one?
Juan Quintela's exec: last_first_tb was only used in !ONLY_USER case
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:24:02PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
The virtio block device holds a lock during I/O request processing.
Kicking
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:24:02PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
The virtio block device holds a lock during I/O request processing.
Kicking the virtqueue while the lock is held results in long lock hold
times
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu wrote:
- executing AIO in the vcpu thread eats up precious vcpu execution
time: combined QCOW2 throughput would be limited by a single
core's performance, and any time spent on QCOW2 processing would
not be spent running the
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 17:50 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/16/2011 09:48 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Pekka Enbergpenb...@kernel.org wrote:
- Fast QCOW2 image read-write support
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Pekka Enberg penb...@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Pekka Enberg penb...@kernel.org wrote:
- Fast QCOW2 image read-write support beating Qemu in fio benchmarks. See the
following URL for test result details: https://gist.github.com/1026888
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 08:35:44PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
---
hw/lsi53c895a.c |2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
This one is already in the trivial-patches tree.
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/15/2011 03:13 PM, Prasad Joshi wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Pekka Enbergpenb...@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Avi Kivitya...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/15/2011 06:53 PM, Pekka
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Hannes Reinecke h...@suse.de wrote:
On 06/10/2011 04:35 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
If requests are placed on arbitrary queues you'll inevitably run on
locking issues to ensure strict request ordering.
I would add here:
If a device uses more than one queue it
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 08:59:27 +0200, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/09/2011 01:28 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
after some preliminary discussion on the QEMU mailing list, I present a
draft
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Vivek Goyal vgo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 06:30:09PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
[..]
The level of consistency will then depend on whether you overcommit
your hardware and how you have it configured.
Agreed.
Consistency is very hard
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Vivek Goyal vgo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 10:15:30PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
One issue that concerns me is how effective iops and throughput are as
capping mechanisms. If you cap throughput then you're likely to
affect sequential I/O
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com wrote:
ioeventfd is way provided by KVM to receive notifications about
reads and writes to PIO and MMIO areas within the guest.
Such notifications are usefull if all we need to know is that
a specific area of the memory has
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Steve Kemp st...@bytemark.co.uk wrote:
On Fri May 20, 2011 at 12:01:58 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
wget http://mirror.bytemark.co.uk/misc/test-files/500M
while true; do cp 500M foo.img; rm foo.img; sleep 2; done
top shows the virt memory growing
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Steve Kemp st...@bytemark.co.uk wrote:
On Fri May 20, 2011 at 14:16:05 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
I've had a quick read of hw/virtio-blk.c but didn't see anything
glaringly obvious. I'll need to trace through the code, drink more
coffee, or get lucky
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Steve Kemp st...@bytemark.co.uk wrote:
I'm running the most recent release of KVM, version 0.14.0
on a host kernel 2.6.32.15, and seem to be able to trigger
a leak of memory pretty easily.
Inside a guest the following one-liner will cause the KVM
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Steve Kemp st...@bytemark.co.uk wrote:
If you have SystemTap installed you may wish to use the dtrace
backend instead of simple. You can then use SystemTap scripts on
the probes
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
+struct MemoryRegion {
+ /* All fields are private - violators will be prosecuted */
+ const MemoryRegionOps *ops;
+ MemoryRegion *parent;
In the case where a region is aliased (mapped twice into the address
space at
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Fred van Zwieten fvzwie...@gmail.com wrote:
Background:
NetApp Snashot functionality gives you application consistent
snapshots of data. Just inform the app a snapshot is about to be made,
depending on the app, it needs to go in to some sort of backup mode,
of
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Chris Thompson cth...@cs.umn.edu wrote:
I'm trying to add a trace to qemu-kvm that will log the value of the vcpu's
clock when a specific interrupt gets pushed. I'm working with
qemu-kvm-0.14.0 on the 2.6.32-31 kernel. I've added the following to
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
With the new used_event and avail_event and features, both
host and guest need similar logic to check whether events are
enabled, so it helps to put the common code in the header.
Note that Xen has similar logic for
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Jagane Sundar jag...@sundar.org wrote:
The direction that I chose to go is slightly different. In both of the
proposals you pointed me at, the original virtual disk is made
read-only and the VM writes to a different COW file. After backup
of the original
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Ryan Wang openspace.w...@gmail.com wrote:
I read some writings on the qemu, and found some demo examples use the
command qemu, some use kvm, and some mention the qemu-kvm?
I wonder are there any difference between these commands? Or they just
point to the
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Jagane Sundar jag...@sundar.org wrote:
I would like to get your input on a KVM feature that I am
currently developing.
What it does is this - it can perform full and incremental
disk backups of running KVM VMs, where a backup is defined
as a snapshot of the
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Ryan Wang openspace.w...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a newbie to qemu/kvm and reading some docs on them.
I've learned some 'virsh' commands. Now I want to know is
there any qemu-monitor commands like 'virsh list'?
Or if I want to list current VMs on my host, I have
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
Note I think in both cases we can make significant improvements:
- for VFs, steer device interrupts to the cpus which run the vcpus that will
receive the interrupts eventually (ISTR some work about this, but not sure)
- for
qemu-img is a pretty good Rosetta stone for image formats but it is
missing support some format versions. In order to bring qemu-img
up-to-date with the latest disk image formats we will need to find
specific image files and/or software versions that produce image files
that qemu-img cannot
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:18:42AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
qemu-img is a pretty good Rosetta stone for image formats but it is
missing support some format versions. In order to bring qemu-img
up-to-date
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Pekka Enberg penb...@kernel.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com wrote:
What hasn't been discussed much is the other half of Kevin's remark: why
QCOW1?
QCOW1 was simpler to implement as the first non-raw image format.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Pekka Enberg penb...@kernel.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
Why even use a non-raw image format? The current implementation only
does sparse files, but POSIX sparse raw files gives you the same
feature
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:26:07AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com writes:
Am 14.04.2011 10:32, schrieb Pekka Enberg:
Hi Kevin!
Am 14.04.2011 10:21, schrieb Pekka Enberg:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Have you
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta
tommaso.cucino...@sssup.it wrote:
I'd like to intercept from the host the exact times at which an incoming
network packet directed to a guest VM:
a) is delivered from the host OS to the KVM process;
b) is delivered to the CPU thread of the KVM
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu wrote:
Strictly talking the guest does not need ICMP packets to have working Internet
connectivity - only passing/tunneling through TCP sockets would be enough.
Don't forget UDP for DNS.
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:18 AM, Josh Durgin josh.dur...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On 04/08/2011 01:43 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 04:15:57PM -0700, Josh Durgin wrote:
librbd stacks on top of librados to provide access
to rbd images.
Using librbd simplifies the qemu code
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Onkar Mahajan kern.de...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have following command line options to qemu-kvm ( apart from others
- irrelevant here !! )
-chardev
socket,id=charmonitor,path=/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/vm00-SMP.monitor,server,nowait
-mon
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Sage Weil s...@newdream.net wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:18 AM, Josh Durgin josh.dur...@dreamhost.com
wrote:
On 04/08/2011 01:43 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 04:15:57PM -0700, Josh
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Kuniyasu Suzaki k.suz...@aist.go.jp wrote:
From: Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com
Subject: Re: EuroSec'11 Presentation
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 17:49:52 +0300
On 04/10/2011 05:23 PM, Kuniyasu Suzaki wrote:
Dear,
I made a presentation about memory disclosure
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 04/11/2011 03:51 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
I'm happy to hear your comments.
The referee's comment was severe. It said there was not brand-new
point, but there are real attack experiences. My paper was just
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 04/08/2011 06:25 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Hi there,
Summary:
- PXE boot in qemu.git (HEAD f124a41) is quite slow, more than 5 minutes.
Got
the problem with e1000, virtio and rtl8139. However, pcnet
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 04:15:57PM -0700, Josh Durgin wrote:
librbd stacks on top of librados to provide access
to rbd images.
Using librbd simplifies the qemu code, and allows
qemu to use new versions of the rbd format
with few (if any) changes.
Signed-off-by: Josh Durgin
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 04:15:57PM -0700, Josh Durgin wrote:
librbd stacks on top of librados to provide access
to rbd images.
Using librbd simplifies the qemu code, and allows
qemu to use new versions of the rbd
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 09:58:22AM -0300, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 11:03 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues l...@redhat.com
wrote:
Perhaps kvm-autotest is a good platform for the automated testing of
ARM
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:53 PM, David Ahern dsah...@gmail.com wrote:
2.6.38.2 kernel with trace-cmd git pulled this morning:
trace-cmd record -e kvm
trace-cmd report 21 | less
trace-cmd: No such file or directory
function ftrace_print_symbols_seq not defined
failed to read event print
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 10:14:03AM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
2011/3/29 Josh Durgin josh.dur...@dreamhost.com:
The new format is
rbd:pool/image[@snapshot][:option1=value1[:option2=value2...]]
Each option is used to configure rados, and may be any Ceph option, or
conf.
The conf
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues l...@redhat.com
wrote:
Thanks for your detailed response!
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 16:29 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
* Public notifications of breakage, qemu.git/master failures to
qemu-devel mailing list.
^ The challenge is to get
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Chris Wright chr...@redhat.com wrote:
kvm-autotest
- roadmap...refactor to centralize testing (handle the xen-autotest split off)
- internally at RH, lmr and cleber maintain autotest server to test
branches (testing qemu.git daily)
- have good automation for
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Nikola Ciprich extmaill...@linuxbox.cz wrote:
I'm using virtio network channel, and on one of the guests (the one with
aborted ext4) I use it also for one of virtual disks.
One more interesting thing, I can't reproduce this immediately after guest
boot, but
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
We're constantly developing and improving KVM, implementing new awesome
features or simply fixing bugs in the existing code.
But do people actually use that new code? Are we maybe writing it all in
vain? Wouldn't it be nice
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Conor Murphy
conor_murphy_v...@hotmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to write a virtio-blk driver for Solaris. I've gotten it to the
point
where Solaris can see the device and create a ZFS file system on it.
However when I try and create a UFS filesystem on the
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 03:51:36PM -0700, Josh Durgin wrote:
You have sent a malformed patch. Please send patches that follow the
guidelines at http://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch and test that
your mail client is not line wrapping or mangling whitespace.
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Conor Murphy
conor_murphy_v...@hotmail.com wrote:
#4 _int_free (av=value optimized out, p=0x7fa24c0009f0, have_lock=0) at
malloc.c:4795
#5 0x004a18fe in qemu_vfree (ptr=0x7fa24c000a00) at oslib-posix.c:76
#6 0x0045af3d in handle_aiocb_rw
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Ben Nagy b...@iagu.net wrote:
KVM commandline (using libvirt):
LC_ALL=C PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/bin
QEMU_AUDIO_DRV=none /usr/local/bin/kvm-snapshot -S -M pc-0.14
-enable-kvm -m 1024 -smp 1,sockets=1,cores=1,threads=1 -name
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Guido Winkelmann
guido-k...@thisisnotatest.de wrote:
Am Wednesday 16 March 2011 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Guido Winkelmann
guido-k...@thisisnotatest.de wrote:
Am Tuesday 15 March 2011 schrieben Sie:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Guido Winkelmann
guido-k...@thisisnotatest.de wrote:
On Monday 14 March 2011 20:32:23 Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Guido Winkelmann
guido-k...@thisisnotatest.de wrote:
Does anybody have an idea what might cause this or what might
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
On 15.03.2011, at 08:09, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Guido Winkelmann
guido-k...@thisisnotatest.de wrote:
On Monday 14 March 2011 20:32:23 Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:05 PM
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
On 15.03.2011, at 10:03, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
On 15.03.2011, at 08:09, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Guido Winkelmann
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Guido Winkelmann
guido-k...@thisisnotatest.de wrote:
Does anybody have an idea what might cause this or what might be done about
it?
The lsi_scsi emulation code is incomplete. It does not handle some
situations like the ORDERED commands or message 0x0c.
There
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:55 AM, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
On 17.02.2011, at 22:01, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-02-07 12:19, Jan Kiszka wrote:
We do not check them, and the only arch with non-empty implementations
always returns 0 (this is also true for qemu-kvm).
Signed-off-by:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Corentin Chary
corentin.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
The threaded VNC servers messed up with QEMU fd handlers without
any kind of locking, and that can cause some nasty race conditions.
The IO-Thread provides appropriate locking primitives to avoid that.
This patch
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/09/2011 11:42 AM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi folks,
would it make sense to make elevator=noop the default
for virtio block devices? Or would you recommend to
set this on the kvm server instead?
I think leaving the
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/QAPI/VirtAgent
That page does not exist. I think you meant this one:
http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/QAPI/GuestAgent
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Mathias Klette mkle...@gmail.com wrote:
I've tested with iozone to compare IO with a linux guest and also to
verify changes made to improve situation - but nothing really helped.
TESTS with iozone -s 4G -r 256k -c -e:
Please use the -I option to bypass the
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:39 AM, ya su suya94...@gmail.com wrote:
io_thread bt as the following:
#0 0x7f3086eaa034 in __lll_lock_wait () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#1 0x7f3086ea5345 in _L_lock_870 () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#2 0x7f3086ea5217 in pthread_mutex_lock () from
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Kevin Clark kevin.cl...@csoft.co.uk wrote:
The results are much better, with 64MB writes on the system drive coming in
at 39MB/s and reads 310MB/s. The second drive gives me 94MB/s for writes and
777MB/s for reads for a 64MB file. Again, that's wildy
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 5:01 AM, ya su suya94...@gmail.com wrote:
kvm start with disk image on nfs server, when nfs server can not be
reached, monitor will be blocked. I change io_thread to SCHED_RR
policy, it will work unfluently waiting for disk read/write timeout.
There are some
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Kevin Clark kevin.cl...@csoft.co.uk wrote:
Any thoughts/ideas?
There are a lot of variables here. Are you using virtio-blk devices
and Windows guest drivers? Are you using hardware RAID5 on the NFS
server? Could it be a network issue (contention during
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 12:39 PM, ya su suya94...@gmail.com wrote:
how about to remove kvm_handle_io/handle_mmio in kvm_run function
into kvm_main_loop, as these operation belong to io operation, this
will remove the qemu_mutux between the 2 threads. is this an
reasonable thought?
In
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
+static unsigned __stdcall win32_start_routine(void *arg)
+{
+ struct QemuThreadData data = *(struct QemuThreadData *) arg;
+ QemuThread *thread = data.thread;
+
+ free(arg);
qemu_free(arg);
Stefan
--
To
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Philipp Hahn h...@univention.de wrote:
Hello,
I tried to install Windows 7 Professional 64 Bit with VirtIO 1.16 on an Debian
based system using AMD64 CPUs. During the install, the system froze (progress
bar didn't advance) and kvm was slowly eating CPU cycles
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Vadim Rozenfeld vroze...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 13:41 +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:30:25AM +, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Philipp Hahn h...@univention.de wrote:
Hello,
I tried
601 - 700 of 883 matches
Mail list logo
