Re: [kvm-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] [PATCH] introduce QEMUAccel and fill it with interrupt specific driver

2008-05-02 Thread Jamie Lokier
Glauber Costa wrote: This patch introduces QEMUAccel, a placeholder for function pointers that aims at helping qemu to abstract accelerators such as kqemu and kvm (actually, the 'accelerator' name was proposed by avi kivity, since he loves referring to kvm that way). Just a little thought...

Re: [kvm-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] [PATCH] introduce QEMUAccel and fill it with interrupt specific driver

2008-05-02 Thread Glauber Costa
Jamie Lokier wrote: Glauber Costa wrote: This patch introduces QEMUAccel, a placeholder for function pointers that aims at helping qemu to abstract accelerators such as kqemu and kvm (actually, the 'accelerator' name was proposed by avi kivity, since he loves referring to kvm that way).

Re: [kvm-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] [PATCH] introduce QEMUAccel and fill it with interrupt specific driver

2008-05-02 Thread Glauber Costa
Paul Brook wrote: Maybe 'VCPU' would be a clearer name? QEMU provides its own VCPU, and KQEMU+QEMU also provide one toegether. While KVM provides essentially one or more whole VCPUs by itself and uses QEMU's drivers only doesn't it? -- Jamie VCPU is rather confusing with the vcpus