Amit Shah wrote:
> * Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> Amit Shah wrote:
>>
>>> * Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
This patch refactors the current hypercall infrastructure to better
support live migration and SMP. It eliminates the hypercall page by
trapping the UD exce
* Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Amit Shah wrote:
> > * Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> >
> >> This patch refactors the current hypercall infrastructure to better
> >> support live migration and SMP. It eliminates the hypercall page by
> >> trapping the UD exception that would occur if you used the wrong
Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 01:18:37PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> The following patchset fixes some bugs in KVM for the next 2.6.23.y stable
>> release. Please apply.
>>
>
> I'm guessing that all of these are already upstream in Linus's tree?
>
>
Yes, except one, which
Hi all..
I want to use VM Snapshots.. But I read QEMU's docs saying
that one must use qcow2 file image for that. The problem is that
My Ubuntu 7.04-based qemu-img (v 0.8.2) has only qcow...
thank you
slohm
-
SF.Net email is
From: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 17:16:34 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] kvm: qemu: Using kvm_arch_try_push_interrupts to hold
arch-sepcific stuff.
In this patch, kvm_arch_try_push_interrupts is used to handle
arch-specific
operations for try_push_interrupts.
Signed-off-by: Zha
From: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 17:22:22 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] kvm: qemu: Using kvm_arch_update_regs_for_sipi to hold
arch-specific sipi operations.
In this patch, kvm_arch_update_regs_for_sipi is introduced for handling
arch-specific
update_regs once sipi received.
S
Hi, Avi
This series of patches are introduced to split qemu-kvm.c, and make it
arch-independent.
In these patches, one file called qemu-kvm-x86.c is created. For
arch-specific stuff, I also use kvm_arch prefix to hold arch-specific
code.
Tested on x86 and x86_64 platform.
[1/10]kvm: qemu : prepa
From: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 14:56:35 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] kvm: qemu : preparation for qemu-kvm.c split.
This patch adds qemu-kvm-x86.c to hold x86-specific code.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
qemu/Makefile.target |4
qemu/qemu-kvm
From: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 15:30:45 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] kvm: qemu: split kvm_qemu_create_context.
This patche splits kvm_qemu_create_context and moves x86-specific
to qemu-kvm-x86.c. Temporarily set kvm_has_msr_star to a gloabal
variant.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Xi
From: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 16:12:42 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] kvm: qemu: Split kvm_qemu_init_env.
Using kvm_arch_qemu_init_env to hold x86-specific stuff.
Moving corresponding static funtions to qemu-kvm-x86.c
Changing back lm_capable_kernel to static variants.
Signe
From: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 16:29:16 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] kvm: qemu, Add kvm_arch_halt to handle arch-specific
halt operations.
In this patch, one arch-specific interface kvm_arch_halt is added to
handle arch halts.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 16:51:23 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] kvm: qemu: using kvm_arch_post_kvm_run to hold
x86-specific code.
In this patch, it use kvm_arch_post_kvm_run to hold
x86-specific code for post_kvm_run;
Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTEC
From: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 16:58:03 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] kvm: qemu: Using to kvm_arch_has_work to handle
arch-specific has_work check.
In this patch, kvm_arch_has_work is introduced to hanlde arch-specific
check.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 16:46:05 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] kvm: qemu: using kvm_arch_pre_kvm_run to hold
x86-specific code.
In this patch, it use kvm_arch_pre_kvm_run to hold
x86-specific code for pre_kvm_run;
Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
* Avi Kivity wrote:
> Amit Shah wrote:
> > * Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Amit Shah wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> What are you using to issue the hypercall?
> >>
> >
> > + r = kvm_hypercall1(KVM_PV_PCI_DEVICE, page_gfn);
> >
> > Setup is done by:
> >
> > + if (!kvm_para_availab
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Slohm Gadaburi
> Sent: Mon 03/12/2007 12:10
> To: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [kvm-devel] VM Snapshots ?
>
> Hi all..
>
> I want to use VM Snapshots.. But I read QEMU's docs saying
> that one must use qcow2 file image for that. The problem
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 11:23:19AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 01:18:37PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> >> The following patchset fixes some bugs in KVM for the next 2.6.23.y stable
> >> release. Please apply.
> >>
> >
> > I'm guessing that all of
Greg KH wrote:
>> 1 a012e65aee48379a7a87eadafa74f878b61522b9
>> 2 4e62417bf317504c0b85e0d7abd236f334f54eaf
>> 3 651a3e29b3d19418d7a8a9787906061f9be7cc5f
>> 4 cf5a94d1331b411b84414c13e43f578260942d6b
>> 5 00b2ef475d4728ca53a2bc788c7978042907e354
>> 6 N/A
>> 7 404fb881b82cf0cf6981832f8d31a7484e4
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> Hi, Avi
> This series of patches are introduced to split qemu-kvm.c, and make it
> arch-independent.
> In these patches, one file called qemu-kvm-x86.c is created. For
> arch-specific stuff, I also use kvm_arch prefix to hold arch-specific
> code.
> Tested on x86 and x86_6
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 03:11:03PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
>
>
>
> >> 1 a012e65aee48379a7a87eadafa74f878b61522b9
> >> 2 4e62417bf317504c0b85e0d7abd236f334f54eaf
> >> 3 651a3e29b3d19418d7a8a9787906061f9be7cc5f
> >> 4 cf5a94d1331b411b84414c13e43f578260942d6b
> >> 5 00b2ef475d47
Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 12:10 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>>> I think new archs for kvm doesn't need to care about kvm-abi
>>> case in their code, since current abi is bigger than 10. But in
>>> current libkvm.c, we can see that many abi-specific code in
On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 12:10 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> > I think new archs for kvm doesn't need to care about kvm-abi
> > case in their code, since current abi is bigger than 10. But in current
> > libkvm.c, we can see that many abi-specific code in it. How to handle it
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>> Hi, Avi
>> This series of patches are introduced to split qemu-kvm.c, and make
>> it arch-independent. In these patches, one file called
>> qemu-kvm-x86.c is created. For arch-specific stuff, I also use
>> kvm_arch prefix to hold arch-specific code. Test
Hi Uri,
On 12/3/07, Uri Lublin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf
> of Slohm Gadaburi
> > Sent: Mon 03/12/2007 12:10
> > To: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: [kvm-devel] VM Snapshots ?
>
> > I want to use VM Snapshots.. But I read QEMU's docs saying
> > th
Hi, Avi
These patches enable libkvm built successfully for ia64. This
is the preparation support for kvm/ia64. It will help us to reduce the
maintain effor once check-in. I will send the subsequent patches to
enable ia64 userspace support.
[1/5] Update configure file to make it work fo
From: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 13:57:07 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Add kvm-ia64.h.
This patch adds kvm-ia64.h, and use getpagesize to get host page size,
since ia64 can use multiple type of page size in kernel.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
libkvm/
From: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 13:37:44 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Update the configure to make it work for ia64
Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
configure |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configu
From: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 22:06:04 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] kvm: libkvm. Moving set and get shadow pages to x86
arch.
Move kvm_set&get_shadow_pages to arch-x86 for libkvm
Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
libkvm/libkvm-x86.c | 34 +
From: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 22:11:02 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] kvm: libkvm. Placing the declaration of kvm_set&get_cr8
declaration under the
constraints of x86.
Placing the declaration of kvm_set&get_cr8 declaration under the
constraints of x86.
Signed-off-by: Zhang
From: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 13:48:20 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Add libkvm-ia64.c, required by ia64 arch compile.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
libkvm/config-ia64.mak |5 +++
libkvm/libkvm-ia64.c | 83
> From: Slohm Gadaburi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 12/3/07, Uri Lublin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Slohm Gadaburi
> > > I want to use VM Snapshots.. But I read QEMU's docs saying
> > > that one must use qcow2 file image for that. The problem is that
>
National Westminster Bank has been receiving complaints
from our customers for unauthorised use of the Natwest Online accounts.
As a result we periodically review Natwest Online Accounts and temporarily restrict access of those accounts which we think are vulnerable to the
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50
I wonder if KVM would be interested in taking my QEMU patch to support
block device statistics.
This patch collects per-block-device statistics and allows them to be
displayed in the monitor through a 'info blockstats' command. It
generalises the VMDK-only support for this which was added to K
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I wonder if KVM would be interested in taking my QEMU patch to support
> block device statistics.
>
> This patch collects per-block-device statistics and allows them to be
> displayed in the monitor through a 'info blockstats' command. It
> generalises the VMDK-only s
Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
4 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
drivers/kvm/iodev.h| 63
drivers/kvm/irq.h |1
drivers/kvm/kvm.h | 42
drivers/kvm/kvm_ma
Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
5 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
drivers/kvm/i8259.c|1 +
drivers/kvm/irq.h |7 ++-
drivers/kvm/kvm.h |9 -
drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c |3 ---
drivers/kvm/x86.h |8
diff --
These patches allow us to stop unconditionally including x86 headers, which
allows us to provide alternative definitions. The first two just split things
out to avoid circular header dependencies.
In fact, with just a couple additional hacks, I was finally able to get a stub
PowerPC implementation
Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
drivers/kvm/kvm.h | 21 ++---
drivers/kvm/types.h | 41 +
diff --git a/drivers/kvm/kvm.h b/drivers/kvm/kvm.h
--- a/drivers/kvm/kv
Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
vcpu->mp_state looks like an arch-specific field, so what do we think about
this patch? It might make sense to fold the kvm_cpu_has_interrupt() test inside
kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable() as well.
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
dri
Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
pio_data is obviously arch-specific, but we might be able to get by with an
ifdef in kvm_vcpu_nopage() rather than needing an arch hook. Thoughts?
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c |2 ++
diff --git a/drivers/kvm/kvm
Jerone Young wrote:
> Actually this is was probably way overkill on moving these. I don't
> think that this patch is really needed. So I say just leave it be.
> Since they are macros they really cause no harm being where they are.
> It's also easier to make sure that none collide on the numbers th
Actually, (now that I try to build with it :) this doesn't work for
PowerPC, which defines (or rather, doesn't not define)
CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT.
So I guess a callout to arch code will do. I'll send a patch sometime.
--
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 16:14 -0600,
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> Actually, (now that I try to build with it :) this doesn't work for
> PowerPC, which defines (or rather, doesn't not define)
> CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT.
You mean ppc has ioport , but you don't use current kvm io
infrastructure to handle it ?
Xiantao
> On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 16
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 12:39 +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>> Hollis Blanchard wrote:
>>> Actually, (now that I try to build with it :) this doesn't work for
>>> PowerPC, which defines (or rather, doesn't not define)
>>> CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT.
>>
>> You mean ppc has ioport , bu
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 12:39 +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > Actually, (now that I try to build with it :) this doesn't work for
> > PowerPC, which defines (or rather, doesn't not define)
> > CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT.
>
> You mean ppc has ioport , but you don't use current kvm i
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 13:04 +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>
> Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 12:39 +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> >> Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> >>> Actually, (now that I try to build with it :) this doesn't work
> for
> >>> PowerPC, which defines (or rather, doesn'
47 matches
Mail list logo
