Re: [PATCH] arm64: rename the function arm64_is_ras_serror() to avoid confusion

Hi James, > Hi gengdongjiu, > > On 26/02/18 16:13, gengdongjiu wrote: > > 2018-02-24 1:58 GMT+08:00 James Morse : > >> On 22/02/18 18:02, Dongjiu Geng wrote: > >>> The RAS SError Syndrome can be Implementation-Defined, > >>> arm64_is_ras_serror() is used to judge whether it

Re: [PATCH] arm64: rename the function arm64_is_ras_serror() to avoid confusion

Hi gengdongjiu, On 26/02/18 16:13, gengdongjiu wrote: > 2018-02-24 1:58 GMT+08:00 James Morse : >> On 22/02/18 18:02, Dongjiu Geng wrote: >>> The RAS SError Syndrome can be Implementation-Defined, >>> arm64_is_ras_serror() is used to judge whether it is RAS SError, >>> but

Re: [PATCH] arm64: rename the function arm64_is_ras_serror() to avoid confusion

Hi James, Thanks a lot for your review. 2018-02-24 1:58 GMT+08:00 James Morse : > Hi Dongjiu Geng, > > On 22/02/18 18:02, Dongjiu Geng wrote: >> The RAS SError Syndrome can be Implementation-Defined, >> arm64_is_ras_serror() is used to judge whether it is RAS SError, >>

Re: [PATCH] arm64: rename the function arm64_is_ras_serror() to avoid confusion

Hi Dongjiu Geng, On 22/02/18 18:02, Dongjiu Geng wrote: > The RAS SError Syndrome can be Implementation-Defined, > arm64_is_ras_serror() is used to judge whether it is RAS SError, > but arm64_is_ras_serror() does not include this judgement. In order > to avoid function name confusion, we rename