Re: [libreoffice-l10n] A little tiny new string for 4.2.1???

2014-01-17 Thread Fridrich Strba
Hello, On 17/01/14 08:11, Andras Timar wrote: Yes, I think we can allow localization/transliteration for all filter names. It is up to the translators to keep the proper names. I trust the community. :) Here I touched only the once that are implemented in writerperfect module. There is still

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] A little tiny new string for 4.2.1???

2014-01-17 Thread Martin Srebotnjak
I suggest yes. Probably these are the filter strings that were not localizable until now. Andras? Lp, m. 2014/1/17 Fridrich Strba fridr...@libreoffice.org Hello, On 17/01/14 08:11, Andras Timar wrote: Yes, I think we can allow localization/transliteration for all filter names. It is up

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] A little tiny new string for 4.2.1???

2014-01-17 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, I updated the templates and triggered the syncing process (but this is rather slow and takes a while), As it processes the languages in alphabetical sorting (regarding the iso-code) - don't be alarmed if nothing new shows up right now. Check again in a few hours. As Andras mentioned: While

[libreoffice-l10n] A little tiny new string for 4.2.1???

2014-01-16 Thread Fridrich Strba
I know that I risk to become a piece of hamburger asking for this, but I will try anyway :) I would love to add for 4.2.1 a new feature (AbiWord import filter). The only problem is that it would mean one new string AbiWord Document for 4.2.1. OTOH, there are already WordPerfect Document and many

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] A little tiny new string for 4.2.1???

2014-01-16 Thread Martin Srebotnjak
Hi, I support inclusion of this new feature and there is no big issue since there will be enough time to localize it for 4.2.1. My question is: why not into 4.2.0? We have 3 day to translate and 1 string is not a nightmare. Lp, m. 2014/1/16 Fridrich Strba fridr...@libreoffice.org I know that

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] A little tiny new string for 4.2.1???

2014-01-16 Thread Fridrich Strba
Martin, On 16/01/14 17:36, Martin Srebotnjak wrote: I support inclusion of this new feature and there is no big issue since there will be enough time to localize it for 4.2.1. My question is: why not into 4.2.0? We have 3 day to translate and 1 string is not a nightmare. You motivated me and

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] A little tiny new string for 4.2.1???

2014-01-16 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi Fridrich, Please coordinate with Cloph too because we need to have the string in Pootle, so make sure he'll be able to update the template. Cheers Sophie GSM Le 16 janv. 2014 20:50, Fridrich Strba fridr...@libreoffice.org a écrit : Martin, On 16/01/14 17:36, Martin Srebotnjak wrote: I

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] A little tiny new string for 4.2.1???

2014-01-16 Thread Andras Timar
Dear Fridrich, On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Fridrich Strba fridr...@libreoffice.org wrote: Martin, On 16/01/14 17:36, Martin Srebotnjak wrote: I support inclusion of this new feature and there is no big issue since there will be enough time to localize it for 4.2.1. My question is: why

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] A little tiny new string for 4.2.1???

2014-01-16 Thread Andras Timar
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Sophie Gautier gautier.sop...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Fridrich, Please coordinate with Cloph too because we need to have the string in Pootle, so make sure he'll be able to update the template. Not every developer is as nice as Fridrich ;) so despite he actually

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] A little tiny new string for 4.2.1???

2014-01-16 Thread Sophie Gautier
Le 16 janv. 2014 21:28, Andras Timar tima...@gmail.com a écrit : On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Sophie Gautier gautier.sop...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Fridrich, Please coordinate with Cloph too because we need to have the string in Pootle, so make sure he'll be able to update the template.

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] A little tiny new string for 4.2.1???

2014-01-16 Thread Martin Srebotnjak
2014/1/16 Andras Timar tima...@gmail.com Content of value xml:lang=x-default tag is not extracted for translation, you need to use xml:lang=en-US. Same applies to all of your exotic filters. So actually you did not add a new string for translation. But you may want to enable translation for

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] A little tiny new string for 4.2.1???

2014-01-16 Thread Fridrich Strba
Hello, On 16/01/14 21:46, Martin Srebotnjak wrote: So I guess these filter strings will be localizable by 4.2.1, as a patch to a bug that marks all these strings unlocalizable? Ouch, I did not realize that thing since ages. The WordPerfect filter for instance is there since 2004/2005 :) Now

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] A little tiny new string for 4.2.1???

2014-01-16 Thread Fridrich Strba
Andras, On 16/01/14 21:18, Andras Timar wrote: Content of value xml:lang=x-default tag is not extracted for translation, you need to use xml:lang=en-US. Same applies to all of your exotic filters. So actually you did not add a new string for translation. But you may want to enable translation

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] A little tiny new string for 4.2.1???

2014-01-16 Thread Andras Timar
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 7:21 AM, Fridrich Strba fridr...@libreoffice.org wrote: Andras, On 16/01/14 21:18, Andras Timar wrote: Content of value xml:lang=x-default tag is not extracted for translation, you need to use xml:lang=en-US. Same applies to all of your exotic filters. So actually you