I don't think it's a case of whipping up the anticipation of readership
to a fever pitch. I think prohibiting pics of the entries is perhaps a
case of Copyright.
Entrants also give sole permission to IOLI to publish the contest
entries.
Debra Jenny's probably the best one to answer this
Since I'm not high enough on the totem pole, I can't *swear* they don't
*any* reimbursment; they may get *some*, and I just wouldn't know.
IOLI Officers aren't paid for their time, that's why they call us
volunteers. *big grin*
Seriously, the money simply isn't there to pay us. Close to
In a message dated 23/09/2005 11:03:57 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
IOLI Officers aren't paid for their time, that's why they call us
volunteers. *big grin*
I think I am right in saying that the officers for the UK lace societies
aren't paid for their *time*, that's the
Jacquie wrote: I still don't think that the people keeping IOLI running
for my benefit should be out of pocket - even if this means my subscription
goes up.
Of course, Jacquie can say that - I pay her IOLI subscription VVBG
(To be honest she pays my Lace Guild AND Lace Circle subscriptions
Hello everyone,
How different things are here in UK!
Tamara P Duvall wrote,
England *alone* is able to sustain 2 nation-wide organisations (Lace Guild
and Lacemakers Circle).
Actually, there are three. The Lace Society predates the Lace Guild, and
many lacemakers belong to all three.
We
On Sep 21, 2005, at 10:37, Elizabeth Pass wrote:
We are so lucky to have many, many lacemakers here in UK, but this has
taken
35 years or more for the numbers to build up.
IOLI celebrated its 50th birthday a couple of years ago (in Hasbrouck
Heights, NY); Montreal's Convention will be 53rd.
Hi All,
Again sorry for the delay in replying, but after five weeks away, no doubt
you can all tot up how many messages I am enjoying reading ...
But - the expenses!I am surprised that the 'officials' of the IOLI - and
any other guild/organisation/group of whatever persuasion for that matter
On Sep 20, 2005, at 6:44, Carol Adkinson wrote:
But - the expenses!I am surprised that the 'officials' of the IOLI
- and
any other guild/organisation/group of whatever persuasion for that
matter -
don't get their expenses for attending the convention/meeting/whatever
reimbursed, as the
In a message dated 14/09/2005 00:52:32 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We set a date of entries being in my hands by July 1st, so that all
paperwork could be checked (don't ask, you'd be surprised what can be
missed from forms), and also so that labels and judging sheets could be
On Sep 14, 2005, at 2:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jacquie) wrote:
Well an *entry* could be made because that could even be e-mailed,
and
that's where possibly a photo in addition could be useful to give the
organisers an idea of what the entry is to be, to be able to start
planning the
I cannot speak as a Contest Chairman, only as the Host group's liaison
person with the IOLI Contest Chairman (this year, Anne Moore and
Sylvie).
We set a date of entries being in my hands by July 1st, so that all
paperwork could be checked (don't ask, you'd be surprised what can be
missed from
On Sep 5, 2005, at 17:59, Helen Bell wrote:
The IOLI Editor knows what he/she (in this year's case, Debra Jenny)
wants for the Bulletin,
Debra has been the IOLI's Bulletin Editor for 3 (4?) yrs, and she's
turned the publication around to the point where I dread the
possibility of her
In a message dated 9/4/2005 12:12:31 AM Mountain Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The entries need to be photographed and ready for publication in the
IOLI Bulletin *before* the Convention, so that the person designated to
photograph them can have a shot at enjoying the Convention
From what I recall from the form for the IOLI contest, you sign a
'waiver' that states that IOLI Board, officer, etc isn't held
responsible for any loss or damage or other incident.
Don't know if that applies to just at Convention or if it applies once
the item is in the hands of the Contest
On Sep 2, 2005, at 19:25, Bev Walker wrote:
I do not think that pieces belonging to someone else that you cart
across
the border into Canada would be taxable or dutiable
Probably not, with the appropriate paperwork done ahead of time; I was
funning. But, what about the (individual) entries
On Sep 2, 2005, at 22:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Might it be more sensible to arrange for a reliable person nearer
Montreal,
who will be driving over the border, to take the American contest
entries? It
is something to think about.
The *optimal* solution would, I think, be for
16 matches
Mail list logo
