In a message dated 7/1/2005 1:40:14 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Devon might know, and I hope she'll
pitch in with her insights.
I hate this sort of thing, because I always make an idiot of myself and
almost immediately upon writing something down, discover it is
Hello spiders:
Tamara wrote:
Most of the lace made then - whether needle or bobbin - was made either
for the Church,
which makes me wonder if this piece might be a communion cup cover. I
know they had such covers in lace, but I have no idea what size it
ought to be.
Adele
in cool and
On 1 Jul 2005, at 18:02, Adele Shaak wrote:
Most of the lace made then - whether needle or bobbin - was made
either
for the Church,
which makes me wonder if this piece might be a communion cup cover. I
know they had such covers in lace, but I have no idea what size it
ought to be.
Or a
On Jun 30, 2005, at 23:58, Alice Howell wrote (in response to Carolyn):
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=7332317820
I am very curious. This doesn't look like anything from the 17th
century to
me. For one thing, it is quite small. Any handkerchiefs that I've
ever
heard of
