Hello Everybody,
Having been twice a judge I can't see any problem touching the lace pieces.
First you look mostly with your eyes, second you will wash your hands before
don't having rings standing out on them and when you must take the lace into
your hand you do it very carefully. One could
In a message dated 24/08/2004 00:10:01 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
quality. So in a couple of catagories there was only one entry which got
3rd place because it was not 1st place quality.
Well, as a quibbler of semantics, this bothers me. Awards for excellence
may be based
Hi Elizabeth!
My advice is the same as the advice I give new lacemakers
who wonder what the author's color scheme and terms mean...
go to the front of each book and see what that author says!
It's the same for competitions... each usually prints a
guide for exhibitors, and usually they also
On 23 Aug 2004, at 18:51, Elizabeth Pass wrote:
It appears that quite a few Arachnes have judged at various fairs and
competitions. What do you look for when judging? I'm sure that lots
of us
would like to know. We may be able to improve our lace and also have
more
confidence about entering.
In a message dated 23/08/2004 21:51:08 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In comparing entries:
Who's to say that a piece that was 2nd one year, if judged the next
wouldn't have been first; that the advice given (if in public) to the 2nd
or 3 prize winners compared to 1st prize
a first place would only be awarded if the piece was of a high enough
quality. So in a couple of catagories there was only one entry which got
3rd place because it was not 1st place quality.
Well, as a quibbler of semantics, this bothers me. Awards for excellence
may be based against an
