typicall lacers - I could make that ... if I had all the bobbins
grin
Liz
In a message dated 28/08/2003 18:10:18 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Subj: Re: [lace] Miss Channer/enforcement issues (Soapbox)
Date: 28/08/2003 18:10:18 GMT Daylight Time
From: A HREF=mailto
are right - it is NOT morally right
Liz
In a message dated 27/08/2003 22:01:05 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Subj: Re: [lace] Miss Channer/enforcement issues
Date: 27/08/2003 22:01:05 GMT Standard Time
From: A HREF=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]/A
To: A HREF
dated 27/08/2003 22:01:05 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Subj: Re: [lace] Miss Channer/enforcement issues
Date: 27/08/2003 22:01:05 GMT Standard Time
From: A HREF=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]/A
To: A HREF=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]/A, A
HREF=mailto
As, I understand it, the principle behind copyright law is to encourage
creativity by ensuring that those who invest effort in a pattern or other
intellectual property may profit from it. Publishers who take the risk in publishing
the work are also deserving of the right to profit. I believe
From: Bev Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I prefer to make my original designs available through lace magazines, for
the
price of buying the magazine.
OK, we've been exploring copyright law through the hypothetical example of
Miss Channer's mat. And Vivienne, I do believe most of the messages
A couple of things... the first is that the pricking published by Ruth
Bean is not the original but an adaptation by Anne Buck of the original.
Perhaps she can have some influence on the possibility of republishing
the pricking? Does anyone know when Ruth Bean Publishers started in
business? If it
Message -
From: Panza, Robin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Marcie Greer' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Arachne (E-mail)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:05 AM
Subject: RE: [lace] Miss Channer/enforcement issues (Soapbox)
From: Marcie Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Second
Yes, if you own something it is your right what you do with it. Also a lot of
the people on this soap box have never seen the mat, second it is quite
boring, third they couldn't do it and finally the only thing that excites people is
the number of bobbins!
KEEP LACING, VIVIENNE,
the mat - but was not an exact duplication -
would that be a violation of copyright?
Clay
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: [lace] Miss Channer/enforcement issues
So, Tom, if someone
Any thoughts of stealing copies of the mat are dreadful. However annoying
it may be not being able to get a copy even copying and giving it to your
friend is illegal. Okay perhaps I feel really strongly about it because Biggins
design and produce patterns which are blatantly copied but it is
need at least eight for a complete place setting. Anyone game?
Tom Andrews
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: [lace] Miss Channer/enforcement issues
So, Tom, if someone
: Clay Blackwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: [lace] Miss Channer/enforcement issues
Hi Tom, and Devon, and other lacemakers!
To take this question in a slightly different direction, how
much
12 matches
Mail list logo
