RE: [lace] Preferred cloth size

2015-01-09 Thread Lorri Ferguson
It is not a silly question, just one you do not know the answer to.For covering objects, I think something in the 18-20 inch range would be usable. A little big for an handkerchief but could also be used for a table topper. Good luck with your project. Lorri Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 15:21:32 -0500

Re: [lace] Preferred cloth size

2015-01-09 Thread Debora Lustgarten
Hi Jazmin, As a fellow SCA-er, I would suggest the handkerchiefs made in late period, with square centers between 4 and 6, embroidery and lace edgings. They were given as tokens. There is a picture of one in Gillian Dye's Gold Silver Edgings page 24. Of course, If you wish to make a larger

Re: [lace] Preferred cloth size

2015-01-09 Thread Malvary Cole
With regard to size - I wonder what would have been used in medieval times. Were hankies used? I would have thought the cover cloth for a basket would probably be appropriate to the use of the time, but was there bobbin lace? I think probably a punto en aria style which would be fairly quick

Re: [lace] Preferred cloth size

2015-01-09 Thread Dmt11home
Since making lace is very time consuming, I would go for the smallest cloth possible. I recommend a chalice cover on the theory that prior to coasters, that was one of the smallest things you could trim with lace. Devon In cold New Jersey - To unsubscribe send email to

[lace] Re: (lace) preferred cloth size

2015-01-09 Thread Beth Marshall
I'd echo the suggestions to keep the size fairly small (particularly if there's a timescale for completing the exchange) as lace grows pretty slowly. I've found that lace-edged cloths about 8 to 12 inches square are fairly versatile - a couple I made as hankies for my Mum got used as