Hi Daniel,
Works fine now. Thanks.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Naber [mailto:daniel.na...@languagetool.org]
Sent: 02 November 2015 11:28
To: development discussion for LanguageTool
Subject: RE: LanguageTool for Chrome
On 2015-11-02 11:25, Mike Unwalla wrote:
> 247 MB, 225
On 2015-11-02 11:25, Mike Unwalla wrote:
Hi Mike,
thanks for your feedback.
> The analysis of the language is sometimes not correct. Refer to
> dictionary-switcher.png.
I know - we have to rely on an existing library that works well but
precision decreases for short texts. You can increase pre
On 2015-11-02 11:25, Mike Unwalla wrote:
> 247 MB, 225 MB, 49 MB
Seems your Java assumes a limit of 255MB, which is sometimes not enough.
I think the reason might be either you're still using a 32 bit machine
or you're using a 32 bit Java. You can start LT from the command line
like this to as
247 MB, 225 MB, 49 MB
Regards,
Mike Unwalla
Contact: www.techscribe.co.uk/techw/contact.htm
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Naber [mailto:daniel.na...@languagetool.org]
Sent: 01 November 2015 10:31
To: development discussion for LanguageTool
Subject: RE: LanguageTool for Chrome
On
ct: RE: LanguageTool for Chrome
On 2015-10-30 17:49, Mike Unwalla wrote:
> Also, the Firefox Automatic Dictionary Switcher version 0.4 does not
> operate correctly. Refer to the attachment (greater-than-symbol.png).
A new version is available but not yet online on
http://addons.mozilla.org. It would
On 2015-10-30 17:49, Mike Unwalla wrote:
> Also, the Firefox Automatic Dictionary Switcher version 0.4 does not
> operate correctly. Refer to the attachment (greater-than-symbol.png).
A new version is available but not yet online on
http://addons.mozilla.org. It would be great if you can test it
On 2015-10-31 11:36, Mike Unwalla wrote:
Hi Mike,
> I cannot make Chrome use a local server. This is what I did:
thanks for the report. For some reason, LT doesn't seem to have enough
memory. If you open the "About" menu in LT stand-alone, what values does
it show after "Java max/total/free me
On 2015-10-30 17:49, Mike Unwalla wrote:
> I tried a few sentences, and LT seems to work OK, except...
>
> I typed this into Chrome:
>
>
> After I clicked Check Text, LT changed the greater than character to
> >
It's a known issue that's tricky to fix and that I won't work on, as
it's someho
.iv...@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 October 2015 10:49
To: development discussion for LanguageTool
Subject: Re: LanguageTool for Chrome
2015-10-28 11:42 GMT+01:00 Daniel Naber :
On 2015-10-27 19:03, Jaume Ortolà i Font wrote:
> It works for me!
>
> I jus
2015-10-28 11:42 GMT+01:00 Daniel Naber :
> On 2015-10-27 19:03, Jaume Ortolà i Font wrote:
>
> > It works for me!
> >
> > I just found that entities like or & (not visible) are
> > detected as a spelling errors.
>
> Should be fixed now (version 0.8.3):
>
>
> https://chrome.google.com/webstore/d
On 2015-10-27 19:03, Jaume Ortolà i Font wrote:
> It works for me!
>
> I just found that entities like or & (not visible) are
> detected as a spelling errors.
Should be fixed now (version 0.8.3):
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/languagetool/oldceeleldhonbafppcapldpdifcinji
Also, th
It works for me!
I just found that entities like or & (not visible) are detected
as a spelling errors.
Regards,
Jaume Ortolà
2015-10-27 18:48 GMT+01:00 Daniel Naber :
> On 2015-10-27 18:29, Xavi Ivars wrote:
>
> > I just did som esmall tests in Gmail, and it still broke the layout,
> > remov
On 2015-10-27 18:29, Xavi Ivars wrote:
> I just did som esmall tests in Gmail, and it still broke the layout,
> removing all the line breaks.
I tested it in gmail and it worked for me. Are you sure you're using the
updated version (0.8.2)? Can you send a screen shot of the input text
before the
2015-10-27 18:17 GMT+01:00 Daniel Naber :
> On 2015-10-23 18:52, Jaume Ortolà i Font wrote:
>
> > The two first issues are solved. The last one not: composing a message
> > in gmail. In plain text mode, the line breaks disappear. In html mode,
> > all formatting disappears.
>
> There are still cas
On 2015-10-23 18:52, Jaume Ortolà i Font wrote:
> The two first issues are solved. The last one not: composing a message
> in gmail. In plain text mode, the line breaks disappear. In html mode,
> all formatting disappears.
There are still cases where replacement will not work, but they should
be
On 2015-10-25 14:44, Juan Martorell wrote:
> I guess so. However, since I was not directly involved in Hunspell
> integration into LT I want to make sure that the upgrade introduces no
> regression. Besides, the extension of the dictionary in LO and in LT
> do not match -- I think that needs a lit
>
> > Latest dictionary in LO5 comes with version 0.8. However in LT source
> > code repository I see the version 0.2.
>
> So can't we just update the version in LT to improve support a lot, with
> little work for us?
>
I guess so. However, since I was not directly involved in Hunspell
integration
On 2015-10-24 16:52, Juan Martorell wrote:
> Latest dictionary in LO5 comes with version 0.8. However in LT source
> code repository I see the version 0.2.
So can't we just update the version in LT to improve support a lot, with
little work for us?
> Extending the Spanish dictionary is an endea
On 2015-10-23 18:52, Jaume Ortolà i Font wrote:
> The two first issues are solved. The last one not: composing a message
> in gmail. In plain text mode, the line breaks disappear. In html mode,
> all formatting disappears.
I understand the problem now, but it will take some time to fix.
Regards
> This is quite high on my TODO, although it sounds like it would make
> more sense to extend the Spanish dictionary in general? Are we already
> using the latest dictionary from LibreOffice?
>
>
Latest dictionary in LO5 comes with version 0.8. However in LT source code
repository I see the version
2015-10-23 16:40 GMT+02:00 Daniel Naber :
> On 2015-10-22 11:21, Jaume Ortolà i Font wrote:
> > I have tested it and I found some strange behavior when trying to
> > replace errors with suggestions.
>
> thanks for your feedback, a new version (0.8.1) has just been released,
> could you test if it
On 2015-10-22 11:33, Juan Martorell wrote:
> Plus, the extension is not configurable, so you're forced to the
> default behaviour, which for Spanish is not optimal given the amount
> of false spell check errors because of the lack of dictionary words --
> and you cannot add them to your local dict
On 2015-10-22 11:21, Jaume Ortolà i Font wrote:
Hi Jaume,
> I have tested it and I found some strange behavior when trying to
> replace errors with suggestions.
thanks for your feedback, a new version (0.8.1) has just been released,
could you test if it fixes the issues?
Everybody else, please
On 22 October 2015 at 11:21, Jaume Ortolà i Font
wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Good job!
>
> I have tested it and I found some strange behavior when trying to replace
> errors with suggestions.
>
> - When the error is the first word of the text, the replacement is not
> done. Nothing happens.
> - In a
Hi Daniel,
Good job!
I have tested it and I found some strange behavior when trying to replace
errors with suggestions.
- When the error is the first word of the text, the replacement is not
done. Nothing happens.
- In a text area, when the text has more than one newline, and I try to
make a rep
On 2015-10-19 23:57, Daniel Naber wrote:
> there's now an early version of a LT extension for Chrome available:
>
> https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/languagetool/oldceeleldhonbafppcapldpdifcinji?hl=de&gl=DE
As there was no feedback, I'm not sure if nobody has tested this or if
everybod
Hi,
there's now an early version of a LT extension for Chrome available:
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/languagetool/oldceeleldhonbafppcapldpdifcinji?hl=de&gl=DE
Please give it a try and report bugs and ideas. The extension cannot be
found yet by searching but only via the link above
27 matches
Mail list logo