On 2015-01-08 23:04, dna...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
LanguageTool Nightly Diff Overview 2015-01-08 22:20
For some reason, the nightly diff email didn't arrive at our mailing
list, and I don't know why. The diff itself is available, though. You
can look at it at
On 2014-10-29 23:18, Marco A.G.Pinto wrote:
What does it mean?:
-Portuguese: 2909 total matches
+Portuguese: 2913 total matches
It means the day before yesterday, there were 2909 matches and
yesterday, there were 2913 matches.
The reason why it got hits is because in pt_BR (Portuguese
Hello!
What does it mean?:
-Portuguese: 2909 total matches
+Portuguese: 2913 total matches
The reason why it got hits is because in pt_BR (Portuguese Brazilian)
the guys use equipe and we in Portugal (pt_PT) use equipa.
equipa means team, just like your soccer team.
In pt_PT, equipe is a
On 2014-10-06 23:05, dna...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
1.
http://languagetool.org/regression-tests/20141006/result_en_20141006.html
FYI, the lower part of the English diff was caused by this Exception,
which I unfortunately cannot reproduce:
Exception in thread main
On 2014-04-15 22:57, dna...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
1.
http://languagetool.org/regression-tests/20140415/result_en_20140415.html
2.
http://languagetool.org/regression-tests/20140415/result_de_20140415.html
3.
On 2013-10-02 23:06, dna...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
1.
http://languagetool.org/regression-tests/20131002/result_en_20131002.html
2.
http://languagetool.org/regression-tests/20131002/result_ru_20131002.html
3.
On 2013-09-18 02:04, dna...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
6.
http://languagetool.org/regression-tests/20130917/result_ca_20130917.html
FYI, the huge diff for Catalan is caused by a change that skips
Wikipedia parsing errors instead of stopping at them. In other words,
we're now analyzing
Daniel,
In the Wikipedia results there are matches for rules that are disabled
in disabled_rules.properties, for example EXIGEIX_VERBS_CENTRAL. Shouldn't
they be ignored?
Regards,
Jaume
2013/9/18 Daniel Naber list2...@danielnaber.de
On 2013-09-18 02:04, dna...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On 2013-09-18 13:09, Jaume Ortolà i Font wrote:
In the Wikipedia results there are matches for rules that are disabled
in disabled_rules.properties, for example EXIGEIX_VERBS_CENTRAL.
Shouldn't they be ignored?
As this is a regression tests, I think this shouldn't matter. In other
words, the
2013/9/18 Daniel Naber list2...@danielnaber.de
On 2013-09-18 13:09, Jaume Ortolà i Font wrote:
In the Wikipedia results there are matches for rules that are disabled
in disabled_rules.properties, for example EXIGEIX_VERBS_CENTRAL.
Shouldn't they be ignored?
As this is a regression
Am 16.07.2013 23:27, schrieb dna...@users.sourceforge.net:
1.
http://languagetool.org/regression-tests/20130716/result_en_20130716.html
2.
http://languagetool.org/regression-tests/20130716/result_de_20130716.html
3.
W dniu 2013-05-18 09:03, Daniel Naber pisze:
One of the recent commits (maybe to UppercaseSentenceStart?) introduced
a lot of changes for probably all languages. Especially fr + it have
changed a lot. Does anybody check if these changes are okay (note: fr +
it are so large your browser might
2013/5/21 Marcin Miłkowski list-addr...@wp.pl
I have a problem with it: all changes create false alarms for Polish.
This is a regression.
Hi Marcin,
Do you mean these changes? [1] They are not creating alarms. They are
removing alarms. Are the changes removing true positives?
What I did in
W dniu 2013-05-21 11:08, Jaume Ortolà i Font pisze:
2013/5/21 Marcin Miłkowski list-addr...@wp.pl mailto:list-addr...@wp.pl
I have a problem with it: all changes create false alarms for Polish.
This is a regression.
Hi Marcin,
Do you mean these changes? [1] They are not creating
2013/5/21 Marcin Miłkowski list-addr...@wp.pl
What I did in UppercaseSentenceStart was to eliminate alarms in
sentences starting with patterns for enumerated lists like these:
a)
b.
iv.
iii)
The latter two are genuine mistakes in Polish: Roman numerals are
written only in
One of the recent commits (maybe to UppercaseSentenceStart?) introduced
a lot of changes for probably all languages. Especially fr + it have
changed a lot. Does anybody check if these changes are okay (note: fr +
it are so large your browser might have a problem with it)?
LanguageTool
Hi,
It seems that in Italian and French, from a certain point on, all the
errors have been removed. I suspect that there is some out of bond
exception that stops the checking of articles. The lines I wrote in
UppercaseSentenceStart
probably are not safe enough. I will change it.
Regards,
Jaume
Am 18.05.2013 09:50, schrieb Jaume Ortolà i Font:
It seems that in Italian and French, from a certain point on, all the
errors have been removed. I suspect that there is some out of bond
exception that stops the checking of articles. The lines I wrote in
UppercaseSentenceStart probably are
On 29.04.2013, 23:08:02 dna...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Changes 2013-04-28 22:20 to 2013-04-29 22:20
Version: 2.2-SNAPSHOT (2013-04-29 22:01)
Not changed: en
Not changed: de
Not changed: fr
[1]Changed: ru
Not changed: br
[2]Changed: ca
Not changed: pl
19 matches
Mail list logo
