On 5/11/07, Salim S I [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a doubt. If you use such a script monitoring the link status with
ping and then reconfiguring, why do you need the DGD patch? You need to do
some reconfiguration (change multipath to a single default route) anyway if
you use the script,
have misunderstood the concept?
-Original Message-
From: Manish Kathuria [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 1:36 PM
To: Salim S I
Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LARTC] DGD patch not detecting dead gateway
On 5/11/07, Salim S I [EMAIL PROTECTED
I have a doubt. If you use such a script monitoring the link status with
ping and then reconfiguring, why do you need the DGD patch? You need to
do some reconfiguration (change multipath to a single default route)
anyway if you use the script, right?
Also, the DGD patch uses src to lookup the
Manish Kathuria escreveu:
On 2/8/07, Tom Lobato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for the script. I'm trying it.
Well, I made a simple modification and would like to hear opnions.
Until now, I just added one more TESTIP, so I'm pinging one IP for
each link.
Also I'm using the IP
Hi!
Thank you for the script. I'm trying it.
Well, I made a simple modification and would like to hear opnions.
Until now, I just added one more TESTIP, so I'm pinging one IP for each link.
Also I'm using the IP instead name address, and used the DNS IP of each provider
for the ping. I
On 2/8/07, Tom Lobato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for the script. I'm trying it.
Well, I made a simple modification and would like to hear opnions.
Until now, I just added one more TESTIP, so I'm pinging one IP for each link.
Also I'm using the IP instead name address, and used
Hi!
Manish Kathuria Wrote:
The method I have adopted is to use a shell script which pings a
popular remote site 's IP (for example www.yahoo.com or
www.google.com) through each of the interfaces every 10 seconds. The
default multipath route is replaced by a single default gateway if
reply
On 1/20/07, Grant Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/19/07 12:45, Manish Kathuria wrote:
My experience has been mixed. The patch worked very well in many cases
but in some it worked only if the first hop gateway was down and not
any of the subsequent hops. So as you mentioned its happening
On 1/27/07, Geoff Dornan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Can you post your script please?
Cheers
geoff
On 1/20/07, Grant Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/19/07 12:45, Manish Kathuria wrote:
My experience has been mixed. The patch worked very well in many
cases
but in some it worked
Hi! Thank you.
Manish Kathuria escreveu:
On 1/19/07, Tom Lobato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all!
I applied http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/routes-2.6.8-10.diff patch to kernel
2.6.8.1 and it works fine, or almost fine. It does the load balancing
well, but when one link is dropped it continues
On 1/19/07, Tom Lobato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all!
I applied http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/routes-2.6.8-10.diff patch to kernel
2.6.8.1 and it works fine, or almost fine. It does the load balancing
well, but when one link is dropped it continues to try it.
At the end of
On 01/19/07 12:45, Manish Kathuria wrote:
My experience has been mixed. The patch worked very well in many cases
but in some it worked only if the first hop gateway was down and not
any of the subsequent hops. So as you mentioned its happening since it
can ping the switch / modem, it thinks the
12 matches
Mail list logo
