On Sun, 30 May 2010, Vannus wrote:
anybody got this working at all?
any other WebDAV clients out there that might work?
there is one out there for delphi, it works with Synapse.
Michael.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 09:09:31AM -0700, Myles Wakeham wrote:
Marco wrote:
That leaves PHP. Which is good for small stuff, but I wouldn't like having
it write to mission critical databases. PHP is only used for small potatoe
and frontends. (leaving a service to do the real work).
Huh?
On 30 Mei 2010, at 23:09, Myles Wakeham wrote:
Huh? Ever heard of Facebook? Or SugarCRM? They are PHP apps.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HipHop_for_PHP
Even facebook developers know that native app will outperform scripting on any
cases. They ended up rewriting PHP RTL, extension, etc.
On 2010-05-30 23:39, Sergei Gorelkin wrote:
Adem wrote:
I am writing a general parser for DTD files and have made some headway.
The FCL xml parser (xmlread unit) can parse XML-conformant DTD files
for several years already.
I should've said a general SGML parser --not just a subset of it
On Mon, 31 May 2010, Bee Jay wrote:
On 30 Mei 2010, at 23:09, Myles Wakeham wrote:
Huh? Ever heard of Facebook? Or SugarCRM? They are PHP apps.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HipHop_for_PHP
Even facebook developers know that native app will outperform scripting on any
cases. They ended
On 31 Mei 2010, at 15:32, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Hah ! :-)
LOL :D You had never heard of it, haven't you? :P
Bee, you didn't just make my day, you made my week. Thanks a lot !! :-)
You're welcome.
Work on fcl-web will definitely continue with double effort :-)
Glad to hear that. Let's
- Original Message -
From: lazarus-requ...@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
To: lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2010 9:16 AM
Subject: Lazarus Digest, Vol 28, Issue 174
Send Lazarus mailing list submissions to
lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
To subscribe
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
On 30 May 2010 18:16, waldo kitty wrote:
does that make sense?? i don't think that these add-on packages would
really be all that large, either...
There is definitely a demand for this. With Lazarus IDE this is a
nightmare - just too many settings to fiddle with.
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 15:57, Rick r...@sloservers.com wrote:
Alexander Klenin wrote:
My current thinking is that it should be a simple comma-separated list
of series indexes, but that seems somewhat un-Pascalish,
so maybe you have a better idea?
I'm too new to Pascal and Lazarus to be of
On 2010-05-31 05:36, Doug Chamberlin wrote:
Doug,
I have great interest in a parser-based code formatting tool.
However, I have doubt that using the compiler's parser is the best
solution.
It may not be the best solution basically bexause it was written solely
for the compiler's needs.
On 05/28/2010 06:18 PM, waldo kitty wrote:
i don't see begin/end as inside or outside... they _are_ the boundary
or frame of the block ;)
To represent this as an indentation you would need to go_
if x then
begin
incode;
end;
outcode;
I never saw anything like that (and don't like it).
On 05/27/2010 12:19 PM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Compile with -vut and right click on messages to save all and hidden
messages to clipboard.
Unfortunately if I try this Lazarus crashes when I do save all and
hidden messages to clipboard. Is there any other way to show these
messages ?
I
Zitat von Technical t...@polypressuk.co.uk:
[...] Send Lazarus mailing list submissions to
lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
Please remove text that has nothing to with your topic. It saves time
of your readers.
Have you create a package for your AlSortGrid.pas?
Yes I have created
Adem wrote:
What is the general name for the adding stuff after the parameter
definition?
The tag !ENTITY % name PUBLIC foo bar declares the entity, and
%name; is used to actually include it.
IOW, the example above has already defined '%HTMLlat1;' so what is the
point in adding (seemingly
Adem, did you see my other mail earlier on this thread?
I suggested using codetools parser for the task and integrate the formatter in
Lazarus.
I wrote:
There is one more parser around, in codetools. It is scanning and parsing code
in the background when you use Lazarus. It is optimized for
Zitat von Adem listmem...@letterboxes.org:
[...]
While I do remember talking about 'un-with'ing (or, 'de-with'ing), I
am not sure if Anthony did get around implementing it in JCF. This
(admittedly an extreme one, one which I haven't even checked to see
if it compiles) is the kind of stuff
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 11:50:45AM +0200, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 05/28/2010 06:18 PM, waldo kitty wrote:
i don't see begin/end as inside or outside... they _are_ the boundary
or frame of the block ;)
To represent this as an indentation you would need to go_
if x then
begin
Am Sonntag 30 Mai 2010, 18:16:09 schrieb waldo kitty:
why can't one locate easily installable, pre-packaged add-ons (not
correct term) for cross-compiling capabilities?
for example, one might install the win32 flavor of Laz/FPC and then simply
install the win32 flavor of the linux
Adem schrieb:
On 2010-05-31 05:36, Doug Chamberlin wrote:
Doug,
I have great interest in a parser-based code formatting tool. However,
I have doubt that using the compiler's parser is the best solution.
It may not be the best solution basically bexause it was written solely
for the
Hello,
To which mail are you responding? I don't see the previous messages.
2010/5/31 Mattias Gärtner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de:
Yes, just using the NewStringGrid component which is just a simple
descendant of TStringGrid
Can you create create a bug report and attach it? I'm sure that
On 2010-05-31 14:36, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Adem schrieb:
On 2010-05-31 05:36, Doug Chamberlin wrote:
Doug,
I have great interest in a parser-based code formatting tool. However,
I have doubt that using the compiler's parser is the best solution.
It may not be the best
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
There is definitely a demand for this. With Lazarus IDE this is a
nightmare - just too many settings to fiddle with. MSEide is much
better at this. With it's different build modes and user defined
macro's it is rather easy to accomplish. fpGUI's IDE (not available to
Yet, as far as parser goes, it is the best solution. Because it is the
originial source of information. Any new additions as well as
corrections go in there --
This is not necessarily true. Someone might hack in support for a new
procedure specifier. However, it is not guranteed that
Zitat von Adem listmem...@letterboxes.org:
[...]
The compiler simply discards comments and it has no infrastructure to
link comments in any way to code.
Naturally, comments are no good for the compiler --so, I am assuming
that the current parser does recognise comments but does not add
On 2010-05-31 14:57, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
But, the parser does produce a parse tree, doesn't it.
FPC doesn't produce a parse tree during compilation. The parser puts
declarations/definitions immediatly into the symtables, for code an
intermediate representation is created which is indeed a
On 2010-05-31 15:00, Mattias Gärtner wrote:
Zitat von Adem listmem...@letterboxes.org:
[...]
The compiler simply discards comments and it has no infrastructure to
link comments in any way to code.
Naturally, comments are no good for the compiler --so, I am assuming
that the current parser
Adem schrieb:
On 2010-05-31 14:57, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
But, the parser does produce a parse tree, doesn't it.
FPC doesn't produce a parse tree during compilation. The parser puts
declarations/definitions immediatly into the symtables, for code an
intermediate representation is created
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Marc Weustink m...@dommelstein.net wrote:
Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl
wrote:
In the case of FPC on windows, best to install the last release
(2.4.0/win32), take a copy of that dir, and copy the
On 2010-05-31 15:28, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Adem schrieb:
On 2010-05-31 14:57, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
But, the parser does produce a parse tree, doesn't it.
FPC doesn't produce a parse tree during compilation. The parser puts
declarations/definitions immediatly into the
On Mon, 31 May 2010, Adem wrote:
On 2010-05-31 15:28, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Adem schrieb:
On 2010-05-31 14:57, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
But, the parser does produce a parse tree, doesn't it.
FPC doesn't produce a parse tree during compilation. The parser puts
declarations/definitions
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 14:15, Adem listmem...@letterboxes.org wrote:
So, if I understand this right, the code is parsed but instead of producing
a tree, a more directly usable structure is created.
Now, the question is, can it be made to produce (in parallel with what it
already does) a
On 2010-05-31 15:42, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 31 May 2010, Adem wrote:
True. In order to avoid this sort of thing all together, the best
solution would be making the compiler use a parse tree.
Florian already explained at the start of the discussion that this is
not feasable because
Zitat von Adem listmem...@letterboxes.org:
[...]
How would *you* deal with macros?
I would not use a complete parser.
I would use a forgiving parser like the synedit highlighter or the
indentation parser of the codetools.
It depends on the features your code formatter should support.
On Mon, 31 May 2010, Adem wrote:
On 2010-05-31 15:42, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 31 May 2010, Adem wrote:
True. In order to avoid this sort of thing all together, the best solution
would be making the compiler use a parse tree.
Florian already explained at the start of the
On 2010-05-31 15:48, Aleksa Todorovic wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 14:15, Ademlistmem...@letterboxes.org wrote:
So, if I understand this right, the code is parsed but instead of producing
a tree, a more directly usable structure is created.
Now, the question is, can it be made to
On 31 May 2010 11:22, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Does it support Windows XP - linux 32 ?
I have not tried that configuration. My main OS is Linux, so I
cross-compile from there to other systems. But if FPC supports that
setup, then it should be possible with MSEide too. The main point
being that
On 31 May 2010 14:01, Juha Manninen wrote:
How does it handle binutils? Do you need to prepare them before building, or
does it somehow install them when needed?
I already had lines as follows in the ~/.fpc.cfg file from previous
attempts, but these could just as easily have been specified
On 2010-05-31 16:01, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 31 May 2010, Adem wrote:
I am not a compiler author, so I do not wish to be arguing with
experts; but, it's not as if we have both alternatives to measure and
chose the best on the aggregate.
I can see that it is expected to be slower
Michael Schnell pisze:
On 05/27/2010 12:19 PM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Compile with -vut and right click on messages to save all and hidden
messages to clipboard.
Unfortunately if I try this Lazarus crashes when I do save all and
hidden messages to clipboard. Is there any other way to show
Dear all,
I have some problems with TDirectoryEdit, TFileNameEdit etc when I try
to align them.
For example if I set align = alTop the edit is aligned and the button
disappears. In the same way it seems that aligning and anchoring does
not consider the button but only the edit.
Lazarus 0.9.29
31.05.2010 21:35, Andrea Mauri wrote:
Dear all,
I have some problems with TDirectoryEdit, TFileNameEdit etc when I try
to align them.
For example if I set align = alTop the edit is aligned and the button
disappears. In the same way it seems that aligning and anchoring does
not consider the
On 31 May 2010 15:40, Paul Ishenin wrote:
disappears. In the same way it seems that aligning and anchoring does not
consider the button but only the edit.
This is so by design.
Umm, last time I was told this is a bug. I think I even report it as
such over a year ago. Even though it is a
On 05/31/2010 03:30 PM, Bogusław Brandys wrote:
You have broken path setting in fpc.cfg
I did guess this. But there might be several fpc.cfg files. where to
search for same ?
Thanks,
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Hi lazarus list,
At the beginning of this discussion I also wondered if one should make a
general purpuse parser out of the compiler's one, but now I think one
should not.
Compiling and code formatting are different tasks. Both need to parse the
code but if you want an optimized solution then the
Hello Dmitry,
I have found out, that when you create a new project and try to put
TPanel on TForm in design time then sometimes the panel is painted
with horizontal or vertical scroll bar area. But this seems to be
relatedtoa luck, because you have to repeat this
31.05.2010 22:17, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Delphi does this with composite components.
We also checked how delphi works. And lazarus works as delphi here.
In delphi it is possible to use now an edit box with enbedded left and
right buttons. This can be done in Lazarus too. At least I
On 2010-05-31 17:21, Krisztián Nagy wrote:
You'll have competing products one pulling one way, the other pulling
another.
I'm not sure I understand you correctly. If you were talking about the
two parsers then this makes no sense to me as we are going to have two
parsers both sticking to the
On 2010-05-31 16:00, Mattias Gärtner wrote:
Zitat von Adem listmem...@letterboxes.org:
[...]
How would *you* deal with macros?
I would not use a complete parser.
I would use a forgiving parser like the synedit highlighter or the
indentation parser of the codetools.
Why is this emphasis on
Well, I don't have any more reasons to present.
Just tell me when you'll have finally decided about which parser to use as a
base and if it is not the compiler's one (based on this discussion it seems
too hard for me) I hereby offer my help in developing it. I can help in both
design/coding or
Hello Dmitry,
I have just tested this behavior on Lazarus Carbon PPC and it is the
same as on Intel.
TRoland;
31.05.2010 16:29 - Roland Turcan k...@rotursoft.sk
RT Hello Dmitry,
RT I have found out, that when you create a new project and try to put
RT TPanel on TForm in design time
Zitat von Adem listmem...@letterboxes.org:
On 2010-05-31 16:00, Mattias Gärtner wrote:
Zitat von Adem listmem...@letterboxes.org:
[...]
How would *you* deal with macros?
I would not use a complete parser.
I would use a forgiving parser like the synedit highlighter or the
indentation
On Mon, 31 May 2010 13:39:29 +0200
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Felipe, can you update the page for 0.9.28?
Which page are we talking about? Except for the numbers changing, I
don't know any change in the install process from 0.9.26 to 0.9.28 to
I marked the correct instructions with (Recommended Method),
reinforcing what was already in the text.
I can't update the advanced instructions without testing them again,
and no time for that... but they shouldn't be used except by power
users.
Hopefully the (Recommended Method) will improve
Andrea Mauri escreveu:
Dear all,
I have some problems with TDirectoryEdit, TFileNameEdit etc when I try
to align them.
For example if I set align = alTop the edit is aligned and the button
disappears.
Try BorderSpacing.Right := 40
Luiz
--
___
--- El sáb 29-may-10, dmitry boyarintsev skalogryz.li...@gmail.com escribió:
So, what unit should an IDE extension and/or LCL components
use?
xmlconf: is used by LazReport
xmlcfg: is used by Grids, XMLPropStorage and the packager
(RegisterFCL.pas, but not sure why)
Laz_XMLCfg: is used
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net wrote:
Well..
To not have problems to compile FPC and Lazarus on Windows, but
continue using SVN for the updates, I received a tip:
- Download a snapshot from ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/lazarus/snapshots/
- Install e.g.
I usually do like this:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net wrote:
1 - Download a snapshot from ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/lazarus/snapshots/
2 - Install e.g. c:\lazarus29 (we would have FPC and Lazarus)
3 - Get sources at SVN and save e.g. c:\lazarussvn
4 -
Michael Schnell schreef:
On 05/31/2010 03:30 PM, Bogusław Brandys wrote:
You have broken path setting in fpc.cfg
I did guess this. But there might be several fpc.cfg files. where to
search for same ?
That's an easy one. Compile with -va, then the compiler will output the
used fpc.cfg.
Why Lazarus apps randomly minimizes at the left of the screen? Is it a bug?
Antônio
webmas...@lazarusbrasil.org
bra...@mindfreedom.org
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On 5/31/2010 05:22, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
On 30 May 2010 18:16, waldo kitty wrote:
does that make sense?? i don't think that these add-on packages would
really be all that large, either...
There is definitely a demand for this. With Lazarus IDE this is a
On 5/31/2010 06:57, Andreas Schneider wrote:
Am Sonntag 30 Mai 2010, 18:16:09 schrieb waldo kitty:
does that make sense?? i don't think that these add-on packages would
really be all that large, either... they're mostly source code and a
binary or three, right?
Compiling for any *nix platform
61 matches
Mail list logo
