On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:45:45AM -0300, Marcos Douglas wrote:
But it's also reinventing the wheel, no?
You say it like you think that is a bad thing :-)
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:45:45AM -0300, Marcos Douglas wrote:
But it's also reinventing the wheel, no?
You say it like you think that is a bad thing :-)
Not a bad thing, but in open sources projects, that you can
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 01:26:11PM -0300, Marcos Douglas wrote:
You say it like you think that is a bad thing :-)
Not a bad thing, but in open sources projects, that you can share
already done codes, I think that could be a waste of time... not all
time, not in this particulary project,
On 05/16/2011 05:27 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Will this allow to create a project with a browser based remote GUI ?
Yes.
Great. looking forward to test it.
Will this help to create a Lazarus Application running as a Daemon on
an Android device and have the user access it via
On Tue, 17 May 2011, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 05/16/2011 05:27 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Will this allow to create a project with a browser based remote GUI ?
Yes.
Great. looking forward to test it.
Will this help to create a Lazarus Application running as a Daemon on an
On 17/05/2011 10:34, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
buggy, it didn't react unless you moved the mouse in the app, both in
Windows and Linux if I recall corretly.
I remember it being Windows only - but that's not important.
While TTimer has been fixed almost immediatly by Graeme after I
On 15/05/2011 23:05, Lee Jenkins wrote:
Great stuff Michael. I can see many uses for the HTTPClient alone without
having to use a third libraries.
Definitely! As soon as FPC 2.6.0 is out, I'll use it in tiOPF's
multi-tier support as well.
Nice work Michael.
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI
On 05/17/2011 10:34 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Any implementation will always use polling. You may hide it under some
kind
of abstraction, but it's always polling. On unix with select() or
epoll(), on Windows with PeekMessage/GetMessage and friends. Your
Delphi windows timer uses
On 05/17/2011 10:42 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Correct. While that design may not be ideal (please mention new designs
if they exist), it is perfectly acceptable in fpGUI because after all,
fpGUI is a 'gui toolkit' for 'gui applications'. ;-)
I really would like to test the newest version :-)
On Tue, 17 May 2011, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 05/17/2011 10:34 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Any implementation will always use polling. You may hide it under some kind
of abstraction, but it's always polling. On unix with select() or epoll(),
on Windows with
On 05/17/2011 11:09 AM, Michael Schnell wrote:
I really would like to test the newest version :-) .
I just fetched the newest update and not I can't compile it any more,.
I get
../../../../fpGUI/src/corelib/x11/fpg_interface.pas(26,3) Fatal: Can't
find unit fpg_x11 used by fpg_interface
On 17/05/2011 11:30, Michael Schnell wrote:
I just fetched the newest update and not I can't compile it any more,.
I haven't tried to compile or use LCL-fpGUI widgetset in ages... I'll
see if I can take a look in the next few days.
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform
On 05/17/2011 11:32 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
That's just name picking. Polling = asking a question.
OK, to be clear we should use busy polling (according to a busy
loop or spinlock).
But even not busy polling (that avoids performance killing for other
threads and processes) is
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15/05/2011 23:05, Lee Jenkins wrote:
Great stuff Michael. I can see many uses for the HTTPClient alone without
having to use a third libraries.
Definitely! As soon as FPC 2.6.0 is out, I'll use it in tiOPF's
On 17/05/2011 14:53, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Yes, nice work... but what is the problem about third libraries?
Nothing per se. But having some vital functionality included in FPC just
makes it so much easier to get a new developer system up and running
(less to install and configure). Not to
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17/05/2011 14:53, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Yes, nice work... but what is the problem about third libraries?
Nothing per se. But having some vital functionality included in FPC just
makes it so much easier to
On 17/05/2011 15:45, Marcos Douglas wrote:
But it's also reinventing the wheel, no?
That could be considered another down side, especially if the 3rd party
library has a lot of functionality.
Other benefits:
- A lite version could be implemented in FPC - reducing time to
implement, and
On 5/17/2011 9:00 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 17/05/2011 14:53, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Yes, nice work... but what is the problem about third libraries?
Nothing per se. But having some vital functionality included in FPC just
makes it so much easier to get a new developer system up and
On Tue, 17 May 2011, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17/05/2011 14:53, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Yes, nice work... but what is the problem about third libraries?
Nothing per se. But having some vital functionality
On Tue, 17 May 2011, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 17/05/2011 15:45, Marcos Douglas wrote:
But it's also reinventing the wheel, no?
That could be considered another down side, especially if the 3rd party
library has a lot of functionality.
Other benefits:
- A lite version could be
On Tue, 17 May 2011, Lee Jenkins wrote:
On 5/17/2011 9:00 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 17/05/2011 14:53, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Yes, nice work... but what is the problem about third libraries?
Nothing per se. But having some vital functionality included in FPC just
makes it so much
One thing I'd like to raise is SSL/TSL. For apps development via FPC
as an industrial viable option, FPC needs SSL/TLS support. Even if
you use openSSL- it still needs to be included.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:13 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Tue, 17 May 2011, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Sorry Michael,
I like yours projects so much. I just want understand the real
vantages in this project to migrate, eg, the Synapse can do same, no?
It can.
But then we must
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Lee Jenkins l...@datatrakpos.com wrote:
On 5/17/2011 9:00 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 17/05/2011 14:53, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Yes, nice work... but what is the problem about third libraries?
Nothing per se. But having some vital functionality included
On 5/17/2011 10:08 AM, Andrew Brunner wrote:
One thing I'd like to raise is SSL/TSL. For apps development via FPC
as an industrial viable option, FPC needs SSL/TLS support. Even if
you use openSSL- it still needs to be included.
I would also very much like to see that as well. It's become
On Sun, 15 May 2011, Lee Jenkins wrote:
On 5/15/2011 12:13 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Hi,
Server:
* Create a TWebHandler and THTTPWebApplication for use as a Lazarus
project.
Comments and suggestions welcome. Please report bugs in the bugtracker.
Michael.
Great stuff Michael. I
On 5/16/2011 3:04 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Sun, 15 May 2011, Lee Jenkins wrote:
On 5/15/2011 12:13 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Hi,
Server:
* Create a TWebHandler and THTTPWebApplication for use as a Lazarus project.
Comments and suggestions welcome. Please report bugs
On 05/15/2011 06:13 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Server:
* Create a TWebHandler and THTTPWebApplication for use as a Lazarus
project.
Will this allow to create a project with a browser based remote GUI ?
Will this help to create a Lazarus Application running as a Daemon on an
Android
On Mon, 16 May 2011, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 05/15/2011 06:13 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Server:
* Create a TWebHandler and THTTPWebApplication for use as a Lazarus
project.
Will this allow to create a project with a browser based remote GUI ?
Yes.
Will this help to create a
Hi,
In the light of recent fppkg and fcl-web discussions:
I've committed simple HTTP server (threaded or not) and HTTP Client
components to FCL-Web. They work using the fcl-net ssockets unit.
(for which a fix has been committed as well). Both use blocking sockets.
The server component is
On 5/15/2011 12:13 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Hi,
In the light of recent fppkg and fcl-web discussions:
I've committed simple HTTP server (threaded or not) and HTTP Client components
to FCL-Web. They work using the fcl-net ssockets unit. (for which a fix has been
committed as well). Both
31 matches
Mail list logo
