Re: [Lazarus] trouble with packages

2009-11-30 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Roberto Padovani wrote: > When I moved from 0.9.24 to 0.9.26 I had to find again on internet all > the packages I used to have and reinstall :-( I install external 3rdParty packages (not included with Lazarus) in a separate folder from the Lazarus directory. eg: /opt/lazarus/ <-- la

[Lazarus] In v0.9.28.3 (svn) the Compiler Options dialog is broken

2009-11-30 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=15226 The last two tabs/options: "Inherited" and "Compilation" doesn't work correctly. I don't know if the same applies in Trunk, I only updated to 0.9.28.3 (svn) now and tested that. Regards, - Graeme - -- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolki

Re: [Lazarus] QT bindings as defalt

2009-11-30 Thread zeljko
On Monday 30 November 2009 18:25, Phil Hess wrote: > Yes, all of the non-Windows widgetsets should behave the same with Orpheus. > If not, then there's probably some difference or issue in the widgetset. I > say "non-Windows" because with win32 you have access to the full Win API, > so there are s

Re: [Lazarus] QT bindings as defalt (was Release 1.0, part 2)

2009-11-30 Thread zeljko
On Monday 30 November 2009 18:17, Phil Hess wrote: > I wish I knew! I really don't have time (or patience) to do more than test > Orpheus against each widgetset for the stable release of Lazarus. > > A couple observations are in order: > > (1) Although once in a while I stumble across something in

Re: [Lazarus] trouble with packages

2009-11-30 Thread Roberto Padovani
2009/12/1 Graeme Geldenhuys : > David Emerson wrote: > > Other than that, I fully agree with you about Packages. To me, they are > the single most handy feature in Lazarus IDE! > > Regards, >  - Graeme - > > -- Very handy, but I have some packages installed in lazarus 0.9.26 and now I would like t

Re: [Lazarus] trouble with packages

2009-11-30 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
David Emerson wrote: > All was working great for a while, but now one of my projects has > decided that it cannot find one of the units that is part of the Can you open the package and double click on the unit in question in that package window? Does it find it and open correctly in the IDE? I o

Re: [Lazarus] trouble with packages

2009-11-30 Thread Phil Hess
David, Can you right click in the Message window (at bottom) and copy all messages to the clipboard, then send the last few lines here. I'm curious to see whether it's a checksum issue that I've been wrestling with. Thanks. -Phil - "David Emerson" wrote: > I have created a package calle

Re: [Lazarus] QT binding works!

2009-11-30 Thread Phil Hess
David, I believe that refers to Environment | Options, then on the Environment Files tab, look for "Lazarus directory". Thanks. -Phil - "David Emerson" wrote: > I'm sorry for being so dense, but where are these Options? I have > looked > in Environment > Options, Tools > Configure Build

[Lazarus] trouble with packages

2009-11-30 Thread David Emerson
I have created a package called "sarala_tools" which I'm using in a couple projects. I've found it fun, interesting, and incredibly useful to create packages. All was working great for a while, but now one of my projects has decided that it cannot find one of the units that is part of the sara

Re: [Lazarus] QT binding works!

2009-11-30 Thread David Emerson
I'm sorry for being so dense, but where are these Options? I have looked in Environment > Options, Tools > Configure Build Lazarus Options, Project > Compiler Options ... maybe I missed it? Thanks! David On Tue 24 Nov 2009, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:12:16 -0800 > David Em

[Lazarus] IDE Bug or Misconfiguration?

2009-11-30 Thread Guionardo Furlan
Lazarus 0.9.29 + FPC 2.5.1 (Codetyphon) Eu coloquei um componente TZQuery em um form e ao clicar nas suas propriedades, a IDE apresenta um erro: fonte não encontrada: unit (*path*)\ZSQLDataset.ppu. Eu passei por erro semelhante no passado, mas não lembro como solucionei naquela época. Já fiz as al

Re: [Lazarus] QT bindings as defalt

2009-11-30 Thread Henry Vermaak
2009/11/30 Phil Hess : > > I'm not sure how good a test the IDE is. That's kind of like saying, "Well, > it worked in the lab, why doesn't work in the field?" > The ide is probably the most used lcl application. Either way, this is a pretty unproductive discussion. What would take a minimal amo

Re: [Lazarus] Release 1.0, part 2

2009-11-30 Thread Alexsander Rosa
I second that - 1.0rc is the best solution. 2009/11/30 zeljko > On Monday 30 November 2009 09:33, Florian Klaempfl wrote: > > > So this proves the point that a version number 1.0 wouldn't change > > anything :) It was FPC which broke things apparently being at version > > 2.2.x. > > You're right

Re: [Lazarus] QT bindings as defalt

2009-11-30 Thread Luiz Americo Pereira Camara
Juha Manninen escreveu: On sunnuntai, 29. marraskuuta 2009 20:49:25 Phil Hess wrote: Juha, I test the 5 major widgetsets with several packages of custom controls that I've ported from Delphi and the Qt widgetset appears to be the least stable: http://web.fastermac.net/~MacPgmr/OrphPort/Or

Re: [Lazarus] QT bindings as defalt

2009-11-30 Thread Phil Hess
- "Juha Manninen" wrote: > > Ok, it isn't ready then. With Lazarus IDE those problems don't come > up. > > Do those components rely on LCL bindings only, or does it need some > custom > binding code? > I mean, if LCL bindings work perfectly then Orpheus comps would start > to work > autom

Re: [Lazarus] QT bindings as defalt (was Release 1.0, part 2)

2009-11-30 Thread Phil Hess
I wish I knew! I really don't have time (or patience) to do more than test Orpheus against each widgetset for the stable release of Lazarus. A couple observations are in order: (1) Although once in a while I stumble across something in the Orpheus code that allows me to fix a problem (as in the

Re: [Lazarus] Actionlist not removed from FActionlists when frame is destroyed.

2009-11-30 Thread Mattias Gärtner
Zitat von Torsten Bonde Christiansen : Hi Lazarus developers. For some odd reason an actionlist (placed on a frame, placed in a tabsheet) that is automatically added to a TCustomForm.FActionLists is not removed from the very same list when the frame is destroyed. This leaves dangling poin

[Lazarus] 2 questions about Component properties

2009-11-30 Thread wile64
Hi, 1) I search to resize component when he load, like autosize but with my parameters ? 2) How to define region for accept client into Tpanel ? -- Laurent. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepasc

[Lazarus] Actionlist not removed from FActionlists when frame is destroyed.

2009-11-30 Thread Torsten Bonde Christiansen
Hi Lazarus developers. For some odd reason an actionlist (placed on a frame, placed in a tabsheet) that is automatically added to a TCustomForm.FActionLists is not removed from the very same list when the frame is destroyed. This leaves dangling pointers (to the destroyed actionlist on the f

Re: [Lazarus] QT bindings as defalt

2009-11-30 Thread Juha Manninen
On sunnuntai, 29. marraskuuta 2009 20:49:25 Phil Hess wrote: > Juha, > > I test the 5 major widgetsets with several packages of custom controls that > I've ported from Delphi and the Qt widgetset appears to be the least > stable: > > http://web.fastermac.net/~MacPgmr/OrphPort/OrphStatus.html#St

Re: [Lazarus] Why does linux+fpc2.2.4+modern lazarus hang? [was: FindInvalidUTF8Character hanging linux hard?]

2009-11-30 Thread Henry Vermaak
2009/11/30 Luca Olivetti : > En/na Henry Vermaak ha escrit: >> >> Just had an idea.  You can use the magic sysrq key to output a > > The magis sysrq didn't work (and, yes, it is configured in the kernel and it > works before it hangs). Ow, not good. Well, I guess the only thing you can do is to c

Re: [Lazarus] Why does linux+fpc2.2.4+modern lazarus hang? [was: FindInvalidUTF8Character hanging linux hard?]

2009-11-30 Thread Luca Olivetti
En/na Henry Vermaak ha escrit: Just had an idea. You can use the magic sysrq key to output a The magis sysrq didn't work (and, yes, it is configured in the kernel and it works before it hangs). Bye -- Luca Olivetti Wetron Automatización S.A. http://www.wetron.es/ Tel. +34 93 5883004 (Ext.1

Re: [Lazarus] Why does linux+fpc2.2.4+modern lazarus hang? [was: FindInvalidUTF8Character hanging linux hard?]

2009-11-30 Thread Henry Vermaak
2009/11/30 Luca Olivetti : > > Just speculating at this point, but if it simply hangs (e.g. stuck in a > tight loop with interrupts disabled) it will be of no use. > With my previous tests on real hardware I could see no messages neither on > the console nor on a remote ssh session. > I though that

Re: [Lazarus] Why does linux+fpc2.2.4+modern lazarus hang? [was: FindInvalidUTF8Character hanging linux hard?]

2009-11-30 Thread Luca Olivetti
En/na Henry Vermaak ha escrit: 2009/11/30 Luca Olivetti : An update: the program has been running for almost two weeks now (actually 13 days) and I deployed it at the customer's site (crossing fingers). This threw me into paranoia mode (I made a small modification to another project and I used t

Re: [Lazarus] Why does linux+fpc2.2.4+modern lazarus hang? [was: FindInvalidUTF8Character hanging linux hard?]

2009-11-30 Thread Henry Vermaak
2009/11/30 Luca Olivetti : > > An update: the program has been running for almost two weeks now (actually > 13 days) and I deployed it at the customer's site (crossing fingers). > This threw me into paranoia mode (I made a small modification to another > project and I used the original fpc version

Re: [Lazarus] Release 1.0, part 2

2009-11-30 Thread zeljko
On Monday 30 November 2009 09:33, Florian Klaempfl wrote: > So this proves the point that a version number 1.0 wouldn't change > anything :) It was FPC which broke things apparently being at version > 2.2.x. You're right, but you can say fpc-1.0 is there, we cannot say lazarus-1.0 is there, that

Re: [Lazarus] Why does linux+fpc2.2.4+modern lazarus hang? [was: FindInvalidUTF8Character hanging linux hard?]

2009-11-30 Thread Luca Olivetti
En/na Luca Olivetti ha escrit: Well, I think (though I cannot be sure until I had the system running more time) that I found a solution: I reverted the development environment to the same situation as 2 years ago (when I made the last successful modification to this program), i.e: fpc 2.0.4

Re: [Lazarus] Release 1.0, part 2

2009-11-30 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Tom Lisjac schrieb: > In contrast, the lazarus-ccr has 56 packages at last count and > Sourceforge shows 124 Lazarus and 432 Pascal projects. These small > numbers provide an alarming perspective on the total Lazarus/FPC > mindshare as Sourceforge also hosts 20,313 projects for Java, 14,645 > for p