Am Freitag 05 März 2010 22:20:51 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
Wouldn't it be better to simply have one tab-type component? All
efforts placed on only improving one component?
Here's a problem: TNotebook is _not_ a tab-type component (well, actually it
shouldn't be a tab-type component). The
Am Sonntag 07 März 2010 12:30:16 schrieb Hans-Peter Diettrich:
Florian Klaempfl schrieb:
Why should I waste time and change to a different program while I could
do this in the file open/save dialog?
Then the file dialogs must use the platform specific file managers. On
Windows, the
Am Montag 08 März 2010 01:58:22 schrieb Doug Chamberlin:
[]
A couple of further specific comments:
I see a bunch of bugs reported and developers posting that those are
fixed. But unless I wade in and install SVN and figure out how to use it
to update my local source and figure out how
Am Mittwoch 31 März 2010 19:06:29 schrieb Bernd:
http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/docs/lcl/dialogs/showmessage.html
Source position: dialogs.pp line 510
procedure ShowMessage(
const aMsg: String
);
there is also an example program:
Program LazMessage;
Uses Dialogs;
begin
On Tuesday, December 6, 2011, at 10:04 Bernd wrote:
2011/12/5 Krzysztof dib...@wp.pl:
SkypeKit has
support only for C++, Python and Java and doesn't have for
multiplatform Free Pascal :(
Theoretically the skype developers should be aware of the existence of
Lazarus/FPC. As far as I know
On Tuesday, December 6, 2011, at 17:32 Marco Ciampa wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 03:25:58PM +0200, Juha Manninen wrote:
2011/12/6 Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl
You do realize that Skype is now Microsoft?
and Skype is not the only or dominant choice any more like it used to be.
On Tuesday, January 17, 2012, at 11:20 Udav wrote:
Sven, I tried searching inside RTL and localtime_r() is only declared in the
libc/newlibc units. I think I'd have to use it because I'm trying to make my
units RAD/FPC compatible and RAD uses libc for POSIX code and doesn't worry
about it.
On Friday, March 23, 2012 20:05 Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Always option 1.
Because it always turns out you need to check for doubles and do updates;
making self written code the most optimal tool. You always know your own
data best of all.
Michael.
I can only confirm this. The
On Monday, April 30, 2012 09:37 Michael Schnell wrote:
On 04/29/2012 12:09 PM, Martin wrote:
Then you have an outdated debug info file,
The release build could just delete this file (provided it's there
where a corresponding debug build would create it).
-Michael
Please don't
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:03:31 +0100, shoKwave wrote:
Hi list,
from time to time there is a user (like me about one year ago)
confused of how to install Lazarus and where to place all the files.
There are some tutorials out there which tell the user to create a
special structure of directories
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:18:28 +0100, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Bo Berglund schrieb:
One of the advantages of following this list via the GMane news
relay
(news.gmane.org group: gmane.comp.ide.lazarus.general) is that the
message bodies are plaintext. :-)
This doesn't help any contributor,
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:34:19 +0100, Marco van de Voort wrote:
I've a problem with it with the latest version of my email-client
(ELM), so
I would like to see it go too!
Fair enough, but I guess it should probably be forbidden by mailman
(which, afaik, offers filtering). So it's up to the
On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 11:19 michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Well, definitely not on Unix.
On unix, the EXE directory should never contain config files.
That depends. I think I'm not the only Lazarus user who has Lazarus
installed in his home directory; i.e. without make install.
On Thursday, March 31, 2011 12:22 Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Right, but this is only a workaround, that requires much care in making
it work. Did you ever notice the many error messages and warnings, at
the first start of a another Lazarus installation, when it tries to
initialize itself
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:53:45 +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Do you mean the no type checking issue is with Firebird Embedded,
or with SQLLite?
Just a side note:
It's just SQLite, with only one L. You might also want to fix this
in the tiOPF related file names.
--
At Wednesday, 24.08.2011 on 15:06 Marcos Douglas wrote:
So, what is the best way to use Win 32 and 64-bit, in my case?
I would suggest: don't go the most complicated route ever ;-)
It's really dead simple to get cross compilation with Windows as target to run.
In your case I would suggest
?
Marcos Douglas
The very first answer (by Felipe) answered that already ;-)
On 24.08.2011 08:59, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
Set your project architecture to x86-64 and compile your project. If
it uses the LCL, then the LCL will automatically be recompiled.
--
Best Regards,
Andreas Schneider
it knows, but it doesn't remove unknown files. I'm not
aware of an SVN equivalent of Mercurial's purge (for example).
So yes, a clean checkout CAN make sense sometimes.
--
Best Regards,
Andreas Schneider
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus
On 25.08.2011 17:09, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 08/25/2011 05:06 PM, Andreas Schneider wrote:
Although slightly off-topic, but SVN's revert is not really clean. It
reverts files it knows, but it doesn't remove unknown files. I'm not
aware of an SVN equivalent of Mercurial's purge (for example
Am Sonntag 30 Mai 2010, 18:16:09 schrieb waldo kitty:
why can't one locate easily installable, pre-packaged add-ons (not
correct term) for cross-compiling capabilities?
for example, one might install the win32 flavor of Laz/FPC and then simply
install the win32 flavor of the linux
Am Freitag 25 Juni 2010, 17:55:38 schrieb bobby:
Hi @all,
Is there in Linux any function to set file time (created/modified)?
I need it to set the file/directory time at unpacking ZIP archives.
As it happens, I had to use such a function for my patch engine ... all
necessary functions and
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:38:03 +0200, Bernd prof7...@googlemail.com wrote:
It will show the text of the above comment when hovering the mouse
over any occurrence of this method call. This is a GREAT feature.
It also shows fpdoc entries. That is even more useful ;-)
Now here comes my
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:14:54 -0400, waldo kitty wkitt...@windstream.net
wrote:
On 7/23/2010 10:34, Juha Manninen wrote:
As a result the page became very long and the relevant information was
very
difficult to find. Other wiki pages have the same problem.
now you know one of my main
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:24:46 -0300, Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net wrote:
I think I must learn GUI programming with Java and port the code. Java
is
already installed on those machines and runs for sure.
The other choise is to boot Windows XP on my mini-laptop, install
Lazarus
there and
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 13:13:31 +0200, Bogusław Brandys bran...@o2.pl
wrote:
Yes,I'm talking about code from xls5biff. I've put it into xls8biff and
it seems to work but in openoffice calc I see error 520 instead of
formula so evidently it need adjustment. What should I change ,maybe
tokens
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 21:19:33 +0200 (CEST), Dimitri Smits
smi...@telenet.be wrote:
Warning: probably off-topic
And a final note on those designers in java: you can and always had the
ability to use a NULL-Layout to use absolute layouting. That is the
closest
to the way Delphi does it.
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:05:46 +0100, Frank Church vfcli...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am thinking along this line but I don't know how to go about. I
usually
drag a component onto a project form for the components unit to be added
to the file I am working on. My units are source units only, not
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 22:25:18 +0200, ik ido...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm using Archlinux, and recently they changed the name of
libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so [1] to libgdk_pixbuf.so .
This is a problem with compiling Lazarus (maybe FPC packages itself,
did not checked). The thing is, that I do
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 08:41:06 -0300, Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net
wrote:
What is the difference to use lazbuild instead of IDEBuild?
Marcos Douglas
You don't have to run the IDE, that's the main advantage. This in turn
is great for automation.
Best Regards,
Andreas.
--
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:34:30 +0100, Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am new to Lazarus but I have noted that the controls I put on a form
look very flat...
I am used to having sunken controls, but there seems to be no place to
set such a property. Am I missing something here?
The
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:37:25 +0100, Joost van der Sluis jo...@cnoc.nl
wrote:
Hi all,
I've been playing to build some more user-friendly download page with
installation instructions.
Before I continue, I would like to know whay you guys find of the basic
idea:
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 10:31:01 +0100, Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 18:19:12 -0300, Osvaldo Filho
arquivos...@gmail.com wrote:
And by the way, Firebird is not “just” engine, but tools around too: .NET
driver [image: ;)] , Java driver, documentation, QA, …, you name
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:44:30 +0100, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 12/11/2010 11:57 PM, Bernd Kreuss wrote:
If you do a make install it might *not* replace an existing compiler
binary at /usr/bin/
I did check this by doing:
/usr/bin/fpc
Free Pascal Compiler version 2.5.1 [2010/12/09] for i386
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:39:33 +0100, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 12/17/2010 11:31 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
Should I just remove it ?
Might be the wisest solution.
renamed it and now I get:
Clean Lazarus Source completed
Fatal: Can't find unit system used by AllLCLUnits
I suppose now no fpc.cfg
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:12:46 +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Note though that if you are creating commercial apps with Qt, you
need to
purchase a license (+-3500 US dollars per developer - last time I
checked).
fpGUI and MSEide are free, even for commercial apps.
That must have been over a
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 12:24:15 +0100, José Mejuto wrote:
Hello Lazarus-List,
Friday, January 7, 2011, 7:54:17 AM, you wrote:
GG I have looked into it (at the time), and it seems that if you set
a
GG breakpoint in the IDE and save the project. Then modify your code
so the
GG line at which the
Guten Tag, shoKwave,
am Dienstag, 11. Januar 2011 um 17:39 schrieben Sie:
Hi list,
I just tried to update my trunk-installation and got this:
./lazbuild -B --build-ide=
An unhandled exception occurred at $006C907B :
Exception : TFPCUnitToSrcCache.GetConfigCache missing
On 11.01.2011, 19:51 Torsten Bonde Christiansen wrote:
I hope i'm not picking on anyone here, but in a previous discussion
(which I started some time ago, similar to this) it was said that
Lazarus trunk should still be able to compile with fpc v2.4.0.
Perhaps the Lazarus developer should
. That automatically gets rid of most custom protocols like git.
--
Andreas Schneider
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
when you do *not*
specify a unit explicitly. So just make sure that LCL's TButton is
always the default one and you can still use your own TButton by
prefixing it with your own unitname. All you want is already there and
seems to cover 99% of the usecases.
--
Andreas Schneider
Lazarus version (0.9.30+) should be THE
answer for such questions :D Yes, you still have to set the define then, but
only once, because after that you just switch to that build mode and are done.
--
Andreas Schneider
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus
On Thursday, January 13, 2011 21:47 Bo Berglund wrote:
I need to build a GUI application, which should act as a simple-to-use
front-end to a Windows console program.
The console program accepts a number of different commands, which are
specified on its command line as parameters separated by
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:25:29 +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Op 2011-01-10 12:41, michael.vancann...@wisa.be het geskryf:
... fpGUI is very sensitive to the order in which you do things.
That's simply because the UI is defined as actual source code (just
like
Qt Creator, any Java form
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:20:47 +0100 (CET), wrote:
This is not correct. People do strive to 100% the same everywhere.
But the 100% the same working on all platforms is hard to reach,
and takes time, it is an ambitious target. Rome also wasn't built on
a
day.
I don't think that 100% the same
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:26:03 +0100, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/10/2011 12:56 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
This approach is only needed if you want to design pure fpGUI
applications (and don't want to use the external designer provided by
fpGUI). This is not needed when using fpGUI as a LCL
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:35:03 +0100, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/16/2011 02:37 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Maybe some code example will help reduce confusion with what fpGUI's
UI
Designer does.
I found that fpGUI _can_ be used with the Lazarus GUI designer. How
does this work related to your
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:57:57 +0100, Michael Schnell wrote:
Obviously. My interpretation is that the two GUI designers, that of
course manage different types of control files and use different ways
to include the GUI design information in the runtime executable, in
the end use the same backend to
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 23:52:58 +0100, Bo Berglund wrote:
So far so good, but when I read the help on TProcess it says that
this
property applies only to Windows. So what happens on Linux?
Will the console show up on screen then?
Or is it automatically hidden in Linux?
There is nothing to hide
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:28:05 +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Alternatively, add the SqlDB source path to your project, then when
you
compile your project, it will compile the SqlDB code too - as if it
was
part of your project source code.
That probably won't work and will only cause
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 12:58 Thorstein Beyer wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Well... if they are talented, then hopefully they knew from the
start how to separate non-GUI code from GUI code in the first place
I strongly disagree with that, because
On Sunday, January 30, 2011 00:13 cobines wrote:
But what about dialog boxes with buttons requiring user input? Usually
you want to have result which button was pressed and such dialog boxes
are shown as modal with ModalResult returned. Showing OpenFile dialog,
showing messages with
Title: Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: How to use GetElementById?
On Sunday, January 30, 2011 13:52 silvioprog wrote:
Sorry... but nobody? :(
Well, when you crosspost to two mailing lists (which you shouldn't ...), then also check both of them ;-) There was an answer on the Lazarus ML.
--
Best
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:16:58 +0100, Bo Berglund wrote:
I have checked out lazarus_0_9_30_fixes branch today into a new
folder
and successfully rebuilt lazarus using the release fpc 2.4.2 (on
windows).
Now inside Lazarus I need to register the SdpoSeriial package so I
open the sdposerial.laz
Hi,
you could also use the with-statement, that is pretty handy in such cases:
|with Edit1.CaretPos do
begin
X := 0;
Y := 0;
end;|
Best Regards,
Andreas
On 08.01.2013 16:30, xrfang wrote:
Hi,
Is there record literal in FPC? e.g. normally, you do:
var
cp : TPoint;
cp.X := 0;
On 09.01.2013 13:19, xrfang wrote:
Hi Adreas,
I just tried, your method did not work as expected. It compiled ok,
but didn't put the cursor at the end of the line as I wanted.
However, assign CaretPos a new TPoint worked.
Regards,
? ?, 1? 9, 2013 at 4:47 ??,Andreas Schneider ak
On Wednesday, January 9, 2013, 01:40pm Paul Ishenin wrote:
First check whether it works delphi mode.
Apparently, it even works in mode objfpc. But only when the property
directly reads/writes a member. If there is a setter method, it will
still compile but NOT actually change the
On 16.05.2014 06:09, Flávio Etrusco wrote:
So in practice it's the same, no? ;-)
It feels a bit annoying to have high numbers in the major version, and
I guess that's why no project ever follows that scheme to the letter.
offtopic
Well, in the browser business they seem to follow that idea to
Am 14.01.2015 um 17:55 schrieb Anthony Walter:
I not aware of any embedded form designer that has existed for
Lazarus. If anyone on the mailing lists know something about that, I'd
love to learn something.
I presume kzDesktop is what you are looking for :-)
Am 08.01.2015 um 02:40 schrieb Marc Santhoff:
What I can't do is make this panel fixed height. Setting it's propety
height in OnREsize of the form doesn't work, I think the other anchors
reset the height according to their rules.
Sounds like you set the anchors wrong.
What you described should
Am 2016-04-02 14:38, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
On 2016-04-02 13:16, Santiago A. wrote:
similar should be done. You would need to make compulsory a command in
source code to tell which code set is using.
As a contract programmer I already struggle working on code where
identifiers, Class
Am 2016-03-24 08:53, schrieb SocGer:
> I have a form designed that if you change the Height, both in design and
> execution, some of its components (Edit, Grid, etc) change my position and it
> break the design.
>
> Can you give me an idea of why this happens?
>
> Thanks in advance.
61 matches
Mail list logo
