On 3-4-2012 18:36, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Reinier Olislagers schrieb:
As long as FPC and Lazarus expect that every user can use a console, I
see no better solution. Except that the developers should decide to
distribute the FPDoc projects instead of the Makefile...
As I mentioned:
Reinier Olislagers schrieb:
Perhaps you could create the batch/shell files from within fpdoc manager
using TProcess.Execute?
Again: not me :-(
I'm not familiar with shelling out to processes, in detail on different
platforms. Where is make, and where is fpdoc? But I'm open to
contributions...
On 5-4-2012 14:21, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Reinier Olislagers schrieb:
Otherwise, you can test if it's in the compiler binary path,
fpcdir\bin\architecture, e.g.
c:\development\fpctrunk\bin\i386-win32\make.exe fpdoc is in
fpcdir\utils\fpdoc\fpdoc.exe (or in the compiler binary path, see
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
The FPDocManager has no platform dependencies. The only external
dependency currently is the fpcdocs Makefile, which should be
replaced by fpdoc projects, supplied and maintained by the FPC/fpdoc
people.
Then why is fpdocmanager in Lazarus, not
On 5-4-2012 14:35, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
Then why is fpdocmanager in Lazarus, not in FPC - I thought fpcdocs
should be maintainable with FPC only without requirement for Lazarus,
but I might be mistaken...
Do the current fpdoc toolset
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 5-4-2012 14:35, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
Then why is fpdocmanager in Lazarus, not in FPC - I thought fpcdocs
should be maintainable with FPC only without requirement for Lazarus,
but I
On 5-4-2012 14:56, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 5-4-2012 14:35, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
Then why is fpdocmanager in Lazarus, not in FPC - I thought fpcdocs
should be
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 5-4-2012 14:56, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 5-4-2012 14:35, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
Then why is fpdocmanager in Lazarus, not
On 5-4-2012 15:26, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 5-4-2012 14:56, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 5-4-2012 14:35, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Reinier Olislagers
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 5-4-2012 15:26, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 5-4-2012 14:56, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 5-4-2012 14:35, michael.vancann...@wisa.be
On 5-4-2012 15:36, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 5-4-2012 15:26, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
A happy user !!
Quick, we must stuff him and put him in a museum !!
Michael.
As long as it's on alcohol ;)
I have plenty of vodka and
Reinier Olislagers schrieb:
On 5-4-2012 14:21, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Reinier Olislagers schrieb:
Otherwise, you can test if it's in the compiler binary path,
fpcdir\bin\architecture, e.g.
c:\development\fpctrunk\bin\i386-win32\make.exe fpdoc is in
fpcdir\utils\fpdoc\fpdoc.exe (or in
michael.vancann...@wisa.be schrieb:
The FCL/RTL docs will have a fpdoc project file, as soon as the necessary
support for it has migrated to the fixes branch. I have set up and tested
these files (albeit only on linux). The fpdoc project file format is
documented already.
That said:
If
On 2-4-2012 9:43, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Reinier Olislagers schrieb:
On 1-4-2012 18:28, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Reinier Olislagers schrieb:
Is it required to have fpcdocs under your FPC directory?
Correction: you are right, according to the FPDoc documentation fpcdocs
must reside
Reinier Olislagers schrieb:
On 2-4-2012 9:43, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Reinier Olislagers schrieb:
On 1-4-2012 18:28, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Reinier Olislagers schrieb:
Is it required to have fpcdocs under your FPC directory?
Correction: you are right, according to the FPDoc
On 3-4-2012 13:36, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Reinier Olislagers schrieb:
On 2-4-2012 9:43, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Reinier Olislagers schrieb:
On 1-4-2012 18:28, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Reinier Olislagers schrieb:
Is it required to have fpcdocs under your FPC directory?
On 2-4-2012 9:43, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Reinier Olislagers schrieb:
On 1-4-2012 18:28, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
4. Trying to select the newly generated rtl.bat gives an access
violation (Lazarus SVN 36494, FPC SVN 20683 x86). Any fix for that?
You're right, I could reproduce and
Reinier Olislagers schrieb:
As long as FPC and Lazarus expect that every user can use a console, I
see no better solution. Except that the developers should decide to
distribute the FPDoc projects instead of the Makefile...
As I mentioned: instead of having the user run make blabla bla.bat:
Reinier Olislagers schrieb:
On 1-4-2012 18:28, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Reinier Olislagers schrieb:
Have somme comments/questions - sorry if these have been raised before:
1. What is the common documentation directory you are asked to select
when starting it for the first time? Does it
Trying out FPDocManager.
Have somme comments/questions - sorry if these have been raised before:
1. What is the common documentation directory you are asked to select
when starting it for the first time? Does it contain your sources?
Compiled documentation? Would be nice if there were a bit more
Reinier Olislagers schrieb:
Trying out FPDocManager.
Thanks for trying out, and for all your feedback :-)
Have somme comments/questions - sorry if these have been raised before:
1. What is the common documentation directory you are asked to select
when starting it for the first time? Does it
21 matches
Mail list logo
