Hi,
> > Why is the cmsFLAGS_NOTPRECALC gone? Is it equivalent to
> > cmsFLAGS_NOOPTIMIZE?
>
> That is what I assumed for GraphicsMagick. It uses the same
> enumerated value. Hopefully my guess was correct.
Yes, that is. The reason is because in lcms1 all possible optimization
was to precal
Hi,
Many Thanks for the bug report Ive,
I will try to reproduce and fix it ASAP.
Best regards
Marti
---
On 10/02/2010 18:09:10, Ive (i...@lilysoft.org) wrote:
I get frequently segfaults when using grayscale profiles for both input
and output and the image data is 8bit.
The segfault appears with
Hi,
XYZ is an absolute space, it doesn't take the adaptation of the
observer into account. Hence, the lcms function does not have
any parameter. If you want a modified XYZ taking chromatic
adaptation into account, you may use Lab, or better, an appearance
model like CAM02
Regards
Marti.
On 30
> It seems that candidate releases and full releases are distributed
identically with same URLs and using the same names.
Oh, really? I am trying hard to avoid this, as obviously may cause lots
of confusion. May be happened in past, but at least for now shouldn't
happen.
> There have also
Thanks Cyrille,
I was aware of that. The short history is, a guy called Adrea Barisani,
claiming to represent some obscure security company called oCERT, was
providing a patch to fix a "vulnerability" they found.
At the end, the oCERT company was just Andrea Barsiani who setup ocert
in 2008 t
I am pleased to announce the release 1.18 of LittleCMS color engine.
LittleCMS intends to be a small-footprint CMM engine, providing cross
platform color management based on ICC profiles. It is free under MIT
license and for now is being used in many commercial & free products, as
well as bein
Maybe a new API for RAW access makes sense after all.
lcms-2.0 would be a good candidate to add this functionality, so thank
you for the suggestion!
All the best
Marti
On 20/03/2009 18:18:00, phil.r...@sun.com wrote:
> If it doesn't make sense, then there's no need to accept it.
>
> I'll dis
Hi,
It seems ok. cmsCreateProofingTransform is a good choice to do that.
Make sure cmsFLAGS_SOFTPROOFING is specified, you can also use
jpegicc with -p option to check the functionality. On the other hand, if
all
input gamut is encompassed by the workspace, yous should see no difference.
Regar
>
> Hi,
>
> Seems an interesting proposal. Maybe I could modify swig lcms.i script
> to get PHP support too.
> Ok, that's now on the list of things to do for next release.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion.
> Regards
> Marti
>
> On 18/06/2008 7:42:19, Louis Solomon [SteelBytes] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> w
Hi,
Unfortunately, there is no way to do that with jpegicc without recompressing
the image.
You can get the maximun quality doing this:
jpegicc -q100 -n -e -i$AdobeICC -o$AdobeICC Input.jpg Output.jpg
But anyway, the image raster would be touched. Sorry, but jpegicc
original goal was just to
Hi,
The installation procedure is quite simple: open a
terminal, go to the lcms directory and type
./configure --with-python
make
sudo make install
If you have python properly installed, all the process
is automatic. You may need super user provileges
for installation.
Hope this helps
R
Hi,
You may download libtiff and libjpeg from those sites:
http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/
http://www.ijg.org/
Otherwise you don't really need that for building the core lcms library.
Regards
Marti Maria
The littleCMS project
http://www.littlecms.com
Hi to all:
I need help with this.
right now in code freeze state, is
available here:
http://www.littlecms.com/downloads.htm
Regards
Marti Maria
The littleCMS project
http://www.littlecms.com
- Original Message -
From: "Alain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LittleCMS Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
S
Hi,
> How is lcms generally used in PHP?
Amazing question since there is no "official" wapper for PHP.
Also, LcmsLoadProfile() des not belong to any lcms API.
Maybe you miss some layer? I mean, lcms is a C library, so you need
some sort of interface for calling lcms from PHP. I bet this is the
because
such small change.
Obviosly some apps were broken in the process.
Regards
Marti
On 10/11/2006 12:43:46, Gerhard Fuernkranz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 09:36:04 +0100
> Von: "LittleCMS Support" <[EMAIL
Hi,
Many thanks for the report. Should work on apps
calling pure lcms API because is backwards
compatible (hence the "1" version number).
In the other hand, versions prior 1.13 are really old
and have some important bugs, so upgrading to 1.14 at
least would be a good idea.
Regards
Marti Maria
T
Hi Kai-Uwe.
> Sees someone else such problems?
The issue seem to be related with wcstombs, which is returning -1 on RedHat.
It seems to work on MSVC. I shall do more testing on other platforms...
Regarding your other questions, there is an updated release candidate fixing
some.
http://www.
Hi,
> Is it safe to assume that i can wrap calls to cmsDoTransform() in
> MMX/3dnow code without calls to emms/femms?
It depends on the compiler/optimizer, as some may use SSE2, etc.
by their own, for example MSVC 2005. But the code does not use
any SIMD or floating point instruction inside cmsD
Hi,
2nd drop of beta for incoming 1.16 is now
available. It solves some small bugs found in
the trial.
The final release would probably be in
middle september.
http://www.littlecms.com/lcms-1.16b.zip
http://www.littlecms.com/lcms-1.16b.tar.gz
Regards
Marti Maria
The littleCMS project
h
Hi,
LittleCMS is a library for developers. Scribus come with lcms
already bundled, so you need to install nothing this time.
Regards
Marti Maria
The littleCMS project
http://www.littlecms.com
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 2:11 PM
20 matches
Mail list logo
