Mike,
Just saw a note from you talking about CVS access - I am awaiting access
myself. The SF id is 'venkisiyer'.
Thanks,
-Venki
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las
Mike Noyes wrote:
I know you've expressed concerns with LEAF branch scripting (ash,
busybox) limitations in the past. Any suggestions (lua, ruby, etc.) you
have are welcome. Maybe even contemplating a static target build from a
Shorewall host script is an option.
I see this as an extension of the g
Everyone,
This is just a reminder that we have a LEAF IRC channel, for those that
prefer IRC to mailing lists.
irc://irc.slashnet.org%23leaf
--
Mike Noyes
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
SF.net Projects: ffl, leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs
-
Everyone,
I'd like us to complete the work Chad Carr started on the leaf config
system. This is one of the main deficiencies I feel we have presently.
lrcfg isn't viable as a sole option anymore. Chad's system allows for
multiple front-end support from command line to http using templates.
Please
Subject was Re: [leaf-devel] New Website & IE
On Sun, 2004-07-04 at 08:16, Tom Eastep wrote:
> Mike Noyes wrote:
> > As always, everyone's opinion is valuable. This is how we reach
> > consensus.
>
> I'm not sure that I had anything valuable to say in the first place. I
> should have taken a dee
Mike Noyes wrote:
You needn't do that. I think Ray was only suggesting a new thread for
the package format discussion.
As always, everyone's opinion is valuable. This is how we reach
consensus.
Mike,
I'm not sure that I had anything valuable to say in the first place. I
should have taken a deep br
On Sat, 2004-07-03 at 16:59, Ray Olszewski wrote:
> At 02:49 PM 7/3/2004 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote:
> > Is it a download from pserver using viewcvs?
Ray,
It is.
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/leaf/devel/kapeka/dachstein_glibc-2.1.3
ViewCVS
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/leaf/
On Sat, 2004-07-03 at 14:27, Tom Eastep wrote:
> Ray Olszewski wrote:
> > It is important, I think, to keep these two sets of issues distinct, not
> > to bounce from one to the other arbitrarily.
>
> You're right Ray -- I'll go back in my cave.
Tom,
You needn't do that. I think Ray was only sugg
