On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, George Metz wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Jack Coates wrote:
>
> > (auto-configuring PCMCIA modems on modern hardware excepted). I'm
> > getting close though -- hardware is good, chat script is munged.
> > Whatever.
>
> It's always something, ain't it? =) Keep me posted on t
Jack Coates wrote:
> between power and Internet access, San Jose is getting to
> be a tough place to be a geek :-(
But it ought to be a GREAT place to be a Disaster Recovery
Specialist :-(
___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Jack Coates wrote:
> yup, that's it -- Danbury would be SNET territory, right?
That's correct. SNET was always the telco of choice for us to deal
with. Once SBC took over, and we started working with ASI for all the
frames down there, it became heavenly. To the best of my kn
yup, that's it -- Danbury would be SNET territory, right?
Man, I haven't had to deal with modems in a long while
(auto-configuring PCMCIA modems on modern hardware excepted). I'm
getting close though -- hardware is good, chat script is munged.
Whatever.
--
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: It's what's
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Jack Coates wrote:
> unless project pronto is still moving forward, IDSL and wireless are my
> only choices. When I left SBC there was some question about the FCC
> allowing pronto to continue...
Is Project Pronto the one I read about where they're setting up
mini-DSLAMs out
unless project pronto is still moving forward, IDSL and wireless are my
only choices. When I left SBC there was some question about the FCC
allowing pronto to continue...
--
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: It's what's for dinner!
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, George Metz wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Jack Co
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Jack Coates wrote:
> thanks for the kind words -- looks like I'll be writing a dial-backup
> HOWTO next, my IDSL line is through NorthPoint and I'm starting to see
> spotty service related to this press release: http://www.northpoint.net.
I don't know if you're aware of this
Jack Coates, 2001-03-23 20:42 -0800
>Good idea, but how will this system handle updates from the authors
>written in non-DocBook?
>
>Hopefully that's a stupid question.
Jack,
It's not stupid. I think we can handle it the same way the Trouble Shooting
Request HowTo was done. Authors will create c
Good idea, but how will this system handle updates from the authors
written in non-DocBook?
Hopefully that's a stupid question.
--
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: It's what's for dinner!
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-03-23 15:02 +0430
> >Jack Coates LRP-QoS How-to
thanks for the kind words -- looks like I'll be writing a dial-backup
HOWTO next, my IDSL line is through NorthPoint and I'm starting to see
spotty service related to this press release: http://www.northpoint.net.
My ISP (http://www.rawbandwidth.net, they're great!) is aggressively
pursuing other
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-03-23 15:02 +0430
>Jack Coates LRP-QoS How-to document makes me think about the question of
>how-to LEAF documentation should be structured. There are obviously two
>aspects to this question:
>1/ A technical one
>This one is already solved from what I understand from the
Jack Coates, 2001-03-23 07:55 -0800
>I think I tried to learn SGML once and decided it wasn't worth my time.
>I write in ASCII text, then use txt2html to convert the doc, clean it up
>by hand, and post it.
Jack,
That's fine. I found that trying to force people to use something they're
not famili
I think I tried to learn SGML once and decided it wasn't worth my time.
I write in ASCII text, then use txt2html to convert the doc, clean it up
by hand, and post it.
--
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: It's what's for dinner!
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jack Coates LRP-QoS How-to
Jack Coates LRP-QoS How-to document makes me think about the question of how-to LEAF
documentation should be structured. There are obviously two aspects to this question:
1/ A technical one
This one is already solved from what I understand from the list: DocBook (XML version
?) is the way to go.
14 matches
Mail list logo
